Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Ralph Fiennes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ralph Fiennes. Show all posts

SKYFALL

Friday, November 2, 2012

SKYFALL
Written by Neil Purvis, Robert Wade and John Logan
Directed by Sam Mendes
Starring Daniel Craig, Javier Bardem, Naomie Harris, Ben Wishaw, Ralph Fiennes and Judi Dench

James Bond: Everybody needs a hobby.
Silva: So what’s yours?
James Bond: Resurrection.

James Bond is getting older. His shot is not as on point as it once was; his stride not as fast as in his younger years. In fact, it saddens me to say that his stomach is not quite the washboard it used to be either. There is one notable offshoot to Bond’s decline in prowess though. With age, comes wisdom and with SKYFALL, the 23rd film in the 007 spy series, that wisdom lends its weight to what is without question one of the most exciting and emotionally charged adventures the series has ever seen.

Sam Mendes, the Academy Award winning director of AMERICAN BEAUTY, opens his crack at the Bond series with the man himself, once again embodied by the masterful Daniel Craig, blurred in the background. As he comes into the light and into focus, we direct our attention to his eyes. These are the eyes of a determined man and before either he or we are able to blink, he finds himself in a high-speed bike chase that takes him to the rooftops of Istanbul, overlooking the Grand Bazaar. Why waste time really? This is an action film after all and Mendes has a clear and firm understanding of what the audience wants from their favorite international spy.


Bond has grown into a complex character over the years. In his last outing, QUANTUM OF SOLACE, his complexities got the best of him. Bond was melancholy and the film suffered for it. In SKYFALL he is no less tortuous but Mendes handles the character with much more control and allows the film’s intricate and energetic action sequences to drive the film forward. Without the weight of Bond’s suffering to hold the film back, he commands even more attention and emerges with even greater strength as a result. This is all the more impressive considering what he has to endure at the onset of the film.

Before the first chase is through, Bond is lost and presumed dead. Naturally, the audience knows he isn’t dead, as this would make for an awfully short film. What he goes through should have surely killed him but somehow he is reborn, resurrected even, and all that once haunted him now seems to propel him forward with a more profound momentum than he has had for some time. It is never explained how Bond survives, although I suspect it has something to do with the healing power of Adele’s opening credits theme song, but the fact that he does live on, confirms his innate greatness and grander purpose.


MI6, the British intelligence agency that Bond serves, is under attack. Bond’s longtime boss and sometimes friend, M (Judi Dench), is the actual target of this aggression. Her reign over the agency is being questioned because a top secret list of undercover agents the world over has fallen into the wrong hands. As names leak to the public little by little, confidence in her ability to manage dissipates at the same rate and her methods are called antiquated and quaint. The question as to whether MI6, and subsequently Bond himself, are still relevant is plainly posed and SKYFALL affirmatively reminds everyone that they are far from finished.

Mendes infuses the Bond series with a level of pedigree it rarely sees. Enlisting John Logan to assist Bond screenwriter regulars, Neil Purvis and Robert Wade, raises the personal stakes for the major characters, as all of them have done things that they aren’t necessarily proud of. Bringing on Roger Deakins, arguably the greatest cinematographer working in film today, invigorates the visual look of the film in so many unexpected ways. His work in Shanghai is particularly creative, which not only makes the fight scenes explode off the screen, but also makes the film a serious visual awards contender. And finally, casting actors as talented as Ralph Fiennes (M’s new boss), Ben Wishaw (a welcome return and updated version of classic character, Q) and Javier Bardem (doing what Bardem does best, the bad guy), elevates everyone’s acting game to the next level.


Despite all of this undeniable ability, both in front of and behind the camera, it is Mendes himself who deserves the most applause. His control over this always elaborate, always exciting and always engaging experience is infallible. He can take the film from quiet and tense one moment to loud and intense the next without missing a beat. SKYFALL is something of a cathartic experience almost. Bond is reborn and while his past transgressions inform the man he has become, they do not dictate the man he is going to be going forward. And after people see the newly reincarnated James Bond, they will no doubt be ready to follow him wherever he goes next.



Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2008: Results

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

5. Eddie Marsan in Happy-Go-Lucky- Marsan a good supporting performance through the film, and even helps Hawkins's performance come alive more in their scenes through the extreme differences of their characters.
4. Aaron Eckhart in The Dark Knight- I would not quite put his performance quite up there with Ledger and Oldman, but on his own he creates his character's journey effectively and gives a strong performance throughout the film.
3. Brad Pitt in Burn After Reading- This is a great performance from Pitt, and  it could not be a better comedic portrayal of an idiot.
2. Gary Oldman in The Dark Knight- Oldman gives a moving performance creating Commissioner Gordon into a fully fledged three dimensional character.
1. Ralph Fiennes in In Bruges- Good Predictions Lezlie and Michael Patison, feel free to name a year and a performance. Fiennes easily wins this year, and I must say I really did consider giving him the overall. I love every aspect of this performance every one of his scenes are amazing as he is both an imposing villain but as well an always hilarious character.
Overall Rank:
  1. Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight
  2. Ralph Fiennes in In Bruges
  3. Gary Oldman in The Dark Knight
  4. Robert Downey Jr. in Tropic Thunder
  5. Brad Pitt in Burn After Reading
  6. Josh Brolin in Milk
  7. Aaron Eckhart in The Dark Knight
  8. Jason Butler Harner in Changeling 
  9. Eddie Marsan in Happy-Go-Lucky
  10. Liev Schrieber in Defiance 
  11. Tom Cruise in Tropic Thunder
  12. John Malkovich in Burn After Reading
  13. Anthony Mackie in The Hurt Locker
  14. Ralph Fiennes in The Duchess 
  15. Richard Jenkins in Burn After Reading
  16. Liam Cunningham in Hunger
  17. Giancarlo Giannini in Quantum of Solace
  18. Viggo Mortensen in Appaloosa
  19. Bill Irwin in Rachel Getting Married
  20. J.K. Simmons in Burn After Reading 
  21. Kevin Bacon in Frost/Nixon
  22. Anil Kapoor in Slumdog Millionaire
  23. Jeff Bridges in Iron Man 
  24. Matthew McConaughey in Tropic Thunder
  25. Mark Strong in Body of Lies
  26. Michael Shannon in Revolutionary Road
  27. Jordan Prentice in In Bruges
  28. Michael Caine in The Dark Knight
  29. Nick Nolte in Tropic Thunder
  30. Morgan Freeman in The Dark Knight 
  31. Chin Han in The Dark Knight
  32. Ralph Fiennes in The Reader
  33. Jeffrey Wright in Quantum of Solace
  34. Russell Crowe in Body of Lies
  35. Haaz Sleiman in The Visitor
  36. Brian Geraghty in The Hurt Locker
  37. Eric Roberts in The Dark Knight 
  38. William Hurt in The Incredible Hulk
  39. Mathieu Amalric in Quantum of Solace
  40. Jack Black in Tropic Thunder
  41. Jay Baruchel in Tropic Thunder
  42. Jamie Bell in Defiance
  43. David Harbour in Revolutionary Road 
  44. Danny Mcbride in Tropic Thunder
  45. James Franco in Milk
  46. Tim Roth in The Incredible Hulk
  47. Sam Rockwell in Frost/Nixon
  48. John Malkovich in Changeling
  49. Oliver Platt in Frost/Nixon
  50. Jeremy Irons in Appaloosa  
  51. Greg Kinnear in Ghost Town
  52. Terrence Howard in Iron Man
  53. Jeffrey Donovan in Changeling
  54. Brandon T. Jackson in Tropic Thunder
  55. Emile Hirsch in Milk
  56. Ray Winstone in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
  57. Bee Vang in Gran Torino
  58. Chris Messina in Vicky Christina Barcelona
  59. John Hurt in  Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (How dare this movie cause a bad John Hurt performance)
  60. Diego Luna in Milk
  61. Shia Laboeuf in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
I should note I only listed supporting performances that I at least remembered in some way.

Next Year: 1985 Supporting

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2008: Ralph Fiennes in In Bruges

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Ralph Fiennes did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Harry Waters in In Bruges.

Ralph Fiennes portrays In Bruges a character who mentioned frequently but not actually seen until fairly late into the film. Fiennes is heard in a voice over, and over the phone before we actually see him. Fiennes accent and voice he uses here is just terrific that is a perpetually angry sounding voice. It is curiously hilarious well still being incredibly intense a the same as Fiennes beautifully creates Harry with this voice before we even see him. He makes it obvious that Harry is not a person to be ticked off as well has a clear power even when he is far from the characters.

This is actually hard performance to begin with and what makes it so good, because everything about it is just so good, so I might as well start at the beginning which is his specific role in the film. He portrays the technical villain who at first order the hit man Ken (Brendan Gleeson) to kill the other hit man Ray (Colin Farrell) who botched a job. After Ken refuses it is up to Harry who sent the men to Bruges to go there himself to deal with them. Fiennes as a villain is terrific in being a constant clear violent threat that seems ready to kill or at least violently injure without delay.

Ralph Fiennes though brings the appropriate threat at all times as Harry whether it is overtly being especially forceful in the rather insane levels of anger Harry can get to when set off. He though is equally effective as being such when he is not overtly angry. One facial reactions I particularly love of Fiennes is when the pitiful thief  injured by Ray gets offended by Harry and gets ready to possibly attack him, Fiennes's face is just perfect. In just the single look there is joy even in Harry's face which suggests that Harry is pretty much ready to brutally beat this man, and enjoy it, if he wants to try and cross him.

Fiennes though does not just settle for being an excellent villain though with this performance, because he never stops being funny either. Fiennes is the master of every line that he says in this performance and is consistently hilarious no matter the situation. This is true when he is loudly launching into expletives at anyone who ticks him off in the slightest, where Fiennes never loses a second and turns this into an art form with Harry. It is equally true when he is a little quieter such as his distinct verbal beat down of the pathetic thief, or his absolutely perfect reaction when he gets offered an Uzi to do his job. Fiennes always turns every reaction and line into comedic gold.

What is amazing is that Fiennes does not just stop after being both a proper villain, and constantly amusing. Fiennes also goes all the way in making Harry a three dimensional character, as his want to kill Ray has nothing to do with hate. The reason Harry wants to kill him ray is that Ray accidentally killed a kid, and Harry feels that proper honor requires one to accept punishment for doing something so terrible. Importantly is that this is not some senseless thing that Harry is using for an excuse to kill Ray, rather Fiennes shows repeatedly that he deeply does believe it fully. He is particular terrific in his wonderfully bizarre scene where Harry tells his family he has to settle something for honor's sake. Fiennes leaves no question that Harry deeply believes in it, and Fiennes makes the scenes oddly poignant while still funny of course.

Fiennes coming in so late into the film as has quite something to live up to against Colin Farrell's and Brendan Gleeson's outstanding performances. Fiennes though is able to do this, and this is especially helped by his absolutely spectacular chemistry with Brendan Gleeson. Only lightly hinted at in terms of the dialogue, but Fiennes and Gleeson are outstanding in showing that the two have clearly a long friendship, and although at odd the two actors marvelously portray an undercurrent of understanding of each other that suggest that. I particularly love the scene where Ken tells Harry why he had to let Ray go, as well as why he will not fight Harry because he respects him too much to do so. Fiennes reaction is stunning as he is able to convey at the same time the anger he feels for Ken not doing what he told him to do, but in his same face is shows that Harry really is moved by Ken's respect for him.

He does something absolutely amazing in his final scene where he actually allows us to sympathize with Harry. The reason being that when Harry has to finally go all the way with his honor, Fiennes shows that Harry's beliefs where not just something his said. His quiet horrified reaction, followed quickly by his understanding of what must be done, is brilliantly played by Fiennes and actually quite moving because he makes it entirely genuine. This is just a great performance from Ralph Fiennes from beginning to end. He never wastes a single line in his entire performance, he never even wastes a moment. He is simply a joy to watch every single scene that he is, and he never for a moment makes this a simple portrayal as Harry could have been. He never settles to just be one thing, he instead is everything he could be in this part, a comedic tour de force, an imposing villain, a fascinating portrait of a man's honor, and even more.

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2008

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

And The Nominees Were Not:

Aaron Eckhart in The Dark Knight

Gary Oldman in The Dark Knight

Ralph Fiennes in In Bruges

Brad Pitt in Burn After Reading

Eddie Marsan in Happy Go Lucky

GREAT EXPECTATIONS

Friday, September 14, 2012

GREAT EXPECTATIONS
Written by David Nicholls
Directed by Mike Newell
Starring Jeremy Irvine, Helena Bonham Carter and Ralph Fiennes

Pip: How can there be beauty without a heart?

It isn’t a good sign when an adaptation of a literary classic makes me question whether or not the book itself deserves to be called a classic. I’ve not read Charles Dickens’s GREAT EXPECTATIONS, but after seeing Mike Newell’s interpretation of the material, I’m not clamoring to either. While it is often beautifully shot, it is also often so outlandish that it is difficult to take any of it very seriously. And given that this particular tale is one that explores such important themes such as class differentiation and abuse of power, I would have liked to have felt the weight that should go along with it.


It starts out very promising. Cinematographer, John Mathieson, frames the quaint England village where Pip lives brilliantly, with striking colour that grounds the picture in a very realistic tone. Pip, an orphan who is played by Jeremy Irvine (WAR HORSE) in his adult years, is a child put upon by all in his life, safe for his sister’s husband, Joe (Jason Flemyng). Under a bizarre arrangement made to have Pip visit a wealthy spinster (Helena Bonham Carter), Pip meets a girl, falls in love and comes to understand that, as the son of a blacksmith, he will never be able to be with her unless he becomes a proper gentlemen. Pip should have been far more weary of what he wished for. His dreams do come true but they come with a very heavy price, as fortune often does.


Larger than life performances by Bonham Carter and Ralph Fiennes (as a convict who threatens and scars Pip as a child) are certainly standout, but they end up eclipsing much of everything else that is happening. This includes the romance between Pip and Estella (Holiday Grainger) that the entire premise of the film revolves around. If there is no love to root for between Pip and Estella, then there is nothing left but a cold look at tortured, difficult times. GREAT EXPECTATIONS can boast a handful of successful elements that make it a passable effort, but it is a far ways off from being called a classic.




140. Page Eight

Thursday, August 2, 2012

140. (25 Jul) Page Eight (2011, David Hare) 52



Though David Hare has a genuine knack for snappy dialogue and developed characterizations, Page Eight efforts to work as a romance and thriller keep it from rising above mediocrity. The acting is rather excellent even as plot twists fail to compel. Though her Emmy nomination is almost certainly from name recognition, Judy Davis makes the most of limited screentime. She, Ralph Fiennes, and Michael Gambon all make incredible impacts in supporting roles.

Winner Breakdown: Makeup

Friday, February 10, 2012


Makeup:
 - Albert Nobbs
- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2
- The Iron Lady


I think this is a pretty solid category, to be honest. There's not really any clear winner, as all are extremely strong competitors. Albert Nobbs, while I haven't seen it, just seeing Glenn Close as a man shows how well the makeup was done. Close truly looked like a male, and she is very feminine looking in real life. Harry Potter, I'm shocked it hasn't been nominated for make-up before, especially for something like the first or second film. This film was have an array of make-up for battle wounds, for goblins, and for Voldemort. While many people think it's mostly CGI, it really isn't (see photo of Fiennes in makeup here: http://www.filmonair.com/img/video/harrypotter7_voldermortsmakeup_hd.jpg). And even Hagrid and Dumbledore. Both wonderful. And finally, we have The Irony Lady, who transformed Meryl Streep into an elderly lady. The make-up, here too, was quite flawless, and Meryl looked utterly convincing as an old woman, with thick wrists and ankles, and wrinkles and liver spots. Who will win? I'd say it's a big showdown between The Iron Lady and Harry Potter, but I'm really hoping Harry Potter can take it. The make-up was truly flawless there, and this win will make it Potter's first (and possibly only) win at the Oscars, ever. I wouldn't count The Iron Lady out though. Nor Albert Nobbs.


Will Win: Harry Potter
Could Win: The Iron Lady
Dark Horse: Albert Nobbs
Who I Want to Win: Harry Potter

Black Sheep interviews Ralph Fiennes

Sunday, January 15, 2012



GENERAL FIENNES
An interview with CORIOLANUS director and star, Ralph Fiennes

Ralph Fiennes is known for playing intimidating, imposing characters, be that in his breakout film, SCHINDLER'S LIST (1993), his Oscar-nominated turn in the epic THE ENGLISH PATIENT (1996) or his recurring role in the HARRY POTTER series, as the Dark Lord himself, Harry’s archnemesis, Voldemort. Like so many great actors before him, Fiennes has finally decided to step behind the camera with his directorial debut, CORIOLANUS. Keeping the experience true to intense form, Fiennes also stars.

“There were times when I came near to it, never totally though,” Fiennes confides when pressed if he ever regretted his decision to direct and star in this career benchmark, when we meet at the Toronto International Film Festival press stop. “Obviously I knew it would be hard and I tried to be as prepared as I could. It was a bit schizophrenic still.”

Based on one of William Shakespeare’s lesser known tragedies, and set in modern day Rome, CORIOLANUS finds Fiennes’ hero briskly built up and violently torn down by a near mad society, desperate for change and better living. “I love it dramatically because I think audiences are challenged as to where to put their allegiance,” says Fiennes of his attraction to the text. “They can start off resisting Coriolanus, then finding a way to admire him despite their thoughts about his views.”

Directing co-star, Gerard Butler
Having played the part over ten years ago, Fiennes knew even then that he wanted to keep the Shakespearean text intact for the present day setting. “I think it’s a potent mix when you put Shakespeare in modern dress,” Fiennes explains of his approach. “The trick is the language, you have to strip it of all theatricality and yet not deny its power.”

On screen with co-star, Jessica Chastain
Considering how stately he is on screen, Fiennes is considerably relaxed and humble in person. He is also quick to point out the important lessons he has taken away from the demanding CORIOLANUS. The first is that he wants to do it again. (He is already in pre-production on an Abi Morgan penned script called THE INVISIBLE WOMAN.) The second is that this time, maybe he’ll just sit back and watch from the director’s chair.

“You don’t want to be thinking about how you’re looking when you’re acting; you want to be just in it, reacting to the other person, but as a director, I have to try to detach.”

479. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

Sunday, November 27, 2011

479. (26 Nov) Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 (2011, David Yates) 55



Considering how lame the final installment of J.K. Rowling's book series was, it was inevitable the film would be troubled. By splitting it in two parts, it amplifies how unremarkable the plotting is. For the sake of the runtime, the story is rushed on the scale that derailed Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. Consider the opening bank heist and the recovery of the Ravenclaw diadem. They're relatively unexciting and bizarrely episodic events considering the film only takes place over the course of a few days. It's not particularly thrilling when a conveniently placed dragon saves your ass or a minor character like Luna Lovegood solves a key mystery like the Ravenclaw horcrux.

Once the battle at Hogwart's begins, the film is crushingly brainless. The challenges that were overcome in Prisoner of Azkaban and Goblet of Fire were because of the cleverness and intellect of the characters. Now they're not even smart enough to think up a spell to stop the fire in the room of requirement or they lamely chase after a snake trying to stab it with a dragon tooth. At some point, the film is simply neither fun nor involving. It simply feels like work watching David Yates resolve a decade-long film series that had towering moments years ago.

The visual effects are still quite good, though the aging in the epilogue is a decided failure. I imagine they'll be the franchise's final Oscar nomination. An Art Direction nod would be inexplicable since there are practically no new sets throughout. Touting it for Best Picture or asking for a Rickman nomination is outlandish.

Best of Black Sheep: HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART 2

Friday, November 11, 2011


Written by Steve Kloves
Directed by David Yates
Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Alan Rickman
and Ralph Fiennes



Harry Potter: Is this all real or is it just happening in my head?
Professor Albus Dumbledore: Of course it's all in your head, Harry, but that doesn't mean it isn't real.
As you may or may not already know, I have only ever followed the literary icon, Harry Potter, on film. When the character made his first movie appearance, I watched simply because I was curious to see what everyone else was obsessing about. I even saw the next few films that followed for no other reason other than pure fascination with the incredible spell they cast over their fans. Fantasy has never been my favorite genre but I have always appreciated its grandness and imaginative nature. Despite this though, my interest in Harry Potter changed somewhere along the way (most likely when David Yates took over as director) and I went from mere observer to eager participant. And now that it’s over, I simply wish it weren’t.

As a stand-alone film, HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART TWO is not the strongest of the series. In succession with the first part though, it is extremely satisfying. Honestly, how could it not be though? When Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) and Voldermort (Ralph Fiennes) face off for the last stand to end all subsequent stands of any kind, it is inevitably transfixing. This moment has been coming for years now and even though we all know how its going to play out, whether you’ve read the books or not, there is still a desperate need to see Harry rise to the ultimate occasion of his life. Structurally though, the final installment is somewhat shaky at the start, feeling more like an afterthought instead of the greatest conclusion of all time. It also lacks the whimsy that has always been present in past Potter pictures, no matter how bleak the scenario seems. There is arguably no room for it here but the heaviness can be sometimes too much to bear.

Once HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART TWO lays everything on the table though, it is relentless. In fact, Yates has no interest in holding any casual viewers’ hands for this last outing. It is an emotional journey that must sink deeper and deeper into despair before any hope of success can be found. The battles are epic and characters from the many years at Hogwart’s return to either perish or flourish within those battles. And then there is Harry himself, alongside his two closest allies, Ron and Hermione (Rupert Grint and Emma Watson). Their growth as both actors and characters has perhaps been the most consistent and compelling aspect of the entire series. Watching them come into their own and develop new understandings of their characters and of themselves has been the series’ secret weapon all along. As they leave the nest, they leave us with one of the most bittersweet farewells at the movies in as long as I can remember.


454. Coriolanus

Sunday, November 6, 2011

454. (02 Nov) Coriolanus (2011, Ralph Fiennes)* 62



The film's finest moments all involve Vanessa Redgrave. Her big speech late in the film is a master class in acting that all but assures her a seventh Oscar nod. She works brilliantly with Ralph Fiennes, who brings an extraordinary intensity to the role and turns Shakespeare's play into an action film. It's an updating in the vein of Loncraine's Richard III, only not as good.

HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART TWO

Saturday, July 16, 2011

Written by Steve Kloves
Directed by David Yates
Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Alan Rickman
and Ralph Fiennes

Harry Potter: Is this all real or is it just happening in my head?

Professor Albus Dumbledore: Of course it's all in your head, Harry, but that doesn't mean it isn't real.

As you may or may not already know, I have only ever followed the literary icon, Harry Potter, on film. When the character made his first movie appearance, I watched simply because I was curious to see what everyone else was obsessing about. I even saw the next few films that followed for no other reason other than pure fascination with the incredible spell they cast over their fans. Fantasy has never been my favorite genre but I have always appreciated its grandness and imaginative nature. Despite this though, my interest in Harry Potter changed somewhere along the way (most likely when David Yates took over as director) and I went from mere observer to eager participant. And now that it’s over, I simply wish it weren’t.

As a stand-alone film, HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART TWO is not the strongest of the series. In succession with the first part though, it is extremely satisfying. Honestly, how could it not be though? When Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) and Voldermort (Ralph Fiennes) face off for the last stand to end all subsequent stands of any kind, it is inevitably transfixing. This moment has been coming for years now and even though we all know how its going to play out, whether you’ve read the books or not, there is still a desperate need to see Harry rise to the ultimate occasion of his life. Structurally though, the final installment is somewhat shaky at the start, feeling more like an afterthought instead of the greatest conclusion of all time. It also lacks the whimsy that has always been present in past Potter pictures, no matter how bleak the scenario seems. There is arguably no room for it here but the heaviness can be sometimes too much to bear.

Once HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS PART TWO lays everything on the table though, it is relentless. In fact, Yates has no interest in holding any casual viewers’ hands for this last outing. It is an emotional journey that must sink deeper and deeper into despair before any hope of success can be found. The battles are epic and characters from the many years at Hogwart’s return to either perish or flourish within those battles. And then there is Harry himself, alongside his two closest allies, Ron and Hermione (Rupert Grint and Emma Watson). Their growth as both actors and characters has perhaps been the most consistent and compelling aspect of the entire series. Watching them come into their own and develop new understandings of their characters and of themselves has been the series’ secret weapon all along. As they leave the nest, they leave us with one of the most bittersweet farewells at the movies in as long as I can remember.

 

Blogger news

Blogroll

Most Reading