Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Sean Connery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sean Connery. Show all posts

019. Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves

Monday, January 21, 2013

019. (21 Jan) Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves (1991, Kevin Reynolds) 7



Kevin Costner and Christian Slater are easy scapegoats because they are, after all, unbelievably wretched here. But Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves fails on most basic levels. Despite all the period sets and costumes, it looks and feels like something a Renaissance fair would put on. As an adventure film, it's boring and obnoxiously self-serious. Without any fun or excitement, this is overlong, tiresome and ultimately painful.

263. Marnie

Thursday, November 8, 2012

263. (04 Nov) Marnie (1964, Alfred Hitchcock) 71



Hitchcock makes his outlandish soap opera as technically proficient, entertaining and moving as is possible. However, Marnie seems quite haphazard when you consider the careful, near-perfect structure of The Birds. It's certainly self-aware, making playful use of the medium, but the sinister tone never quites rings completely true. Still, I'll never look at the color red the same way again.

195. Zardoz

Monday, September 10, 2012

195. (09 Sep) Zardoz (1974, John Boorman) 49



An acid trip for the ages, Zardoz is mind-bending and entertaining, but almost instantly forgettable. Because there's so much wacky imagery here, it's hard for much of it to stand out (though a floating head and Connery's red briefs are clear exceptions). I imagine the film, with its heavy plot and continuous twists, makes more sense and is probably more rewarding on a second viewing. The first go around it's hard not to get caught up in the absurdity of refrains like, "The gun is good! The penis is evil!"

Alternate Best Actor 1965: Results

Thursday, July 19, 2012

5. Michael Caine in The Ipcress File- Caine uses his unique screen presence and on screen marvelously here to make Harry Palmer a down to earth, and very likable hero.
4. Omar Sharif in Doctor Zhivago-This really is not the usual performance for an epic, but Sharif makes the most of his character and successfully carries the film.
3. Lee Van Cleef in For A Few Dollars More-  It is a performance of quiet simplicity, and in this simplicity is where the incredible strength of this performance lies.
2. Sean Connery in The Hill- This is an excellent showcase of Connery's talent as he not only utilizes his more commonly found command of the screen, but as well effectively shows us that he is fully capable of creating an emotionally resonate character portrait.
1. Terence Stamp in The Collector-This is a great performance by Stamp as both a humane portrait of a lonely man, but at the same time a convincing portrayal of a man who seems to prefer the dead over the living. This is again an incredible year, and again Stamp wins for now but Connery, Steiger, and Burton are not far behind.
Overall Rank:
  1. Terence Stamp in The Collector
  2. Richard Burton in The Spy Who Came in From The Cold
  3. Rod Steiger in The Pawnbroker
  4. Sean Connery in The Hill
  5. Lee Van Cleef in For A Few Dollars More
  6. Omar Sharif in Doctor Zhivago
  7. Oskar Werner in Ship of Fools
  8. Michael Caine in The Ipcress File
  9. Frank Sinatra in Von Ryan's Express
  10. Laurence Olivier in Othello
  11. James Stewart in The Flight of the Phoenix
  12. Lee Marvin in Cat Ballou
  13. Clint Eastwood in For A Few Dollars More
  14. Sean Connery in Thunderball
  15. Frank Finlay in Othello
  16. Jason Robards in A Thousand Clowns
Next Year: 2011

Alternate Best Actor 1965: Sean Connery in The Hill

Monday, July 16, 2012

Sean Connery did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Joe Roberts in The Hill.

The Hill is an excellent film about the inner workings of a British Army Prison in the middle of the desert which has many internal disruptions after one of the prisoners recently brought in has died due to punishment.

The fact that Sean Connery received no awards interest for this film is no surprise. He was James Bond at the time simple as that, and it would take a long time for him to be separated from the character, and even longer for the academy to bother recognize him. Also he was not helped by the fact that The Hill, although recognized other places, was completely ignored by the academy. This is completely absurd of course because this is a great film, infinitely better than A Thousand Clowns, and for the academy not even to recognize Harry Andrews who won The NBR for Supporting actor, shows the Hill to be one of the biggest oversights by the academy.

Sean Connery portrays one of the prisoners of the camp Joe Roberts who was a former Sergeant Major. He is very different than the rest of the prisoners who are there for theft, going awol, or some other petty military crime, Roberts there is for punching an officer after refusing to send his men into a surely fatal mission. Roberts also was a successful career soldier and his fall from grace was sudden. Connery is perfect for the role of the once completely loyal soldier. Connery shows early on that he is not the same as the rest of the men, and his stance, and look shows us Roberts's history before coming to the prison.

Connery is great here because he still does keep much of what a career soldier who have from his very proper posture to his ability to carry out the orders, but there is something very different about him that shows how he fell out of favor. Roberts is in rebellion of what he has once served so faithfully, but it is not from laziness or cowardice but from his own sense of right and wrong. Connery does not portray this anger as some random notion that has just suddenly come from nowhere, but rather it was a slow realization of the all of the problems with the military that he has suffered from for far too long.

Something very interesting that Connery does with the role is show that the same conviction that he would have had as a soldier carries right over to his attacks against the system he was once part of. This is a very different role for Connery in that he is always a captive in the film, and Roberts does not fight his way out the situation rather he thinks his way out of it. Connery same power of his presence that he used in his roles as a action hero like James Bond is also quite presence here as he has the same if not greater conviction in his performance here as the hero who has to use his wits instead of his fists to win the day.

Now I almost considered putting Connery in supporting since so much time is given to so many characters in this film, which is part of what makes it such a strong film, but I still do believe Connery is lead even though he might not even have the most screen time in the film. The reason for this is Roberts still is the driving part of the film, and is the one who moves the story forward. Although technically speaking the problems begin due to the death of one the prisoners Stephens (Alfred Lynch) caused by the brutal treatment of the sadistic Staff Sergeant Williams (Ian Hendry), it is Roberts who makes sure that Stephens's death will not mean nothing.

Before the death though Connery is excellent in showing exactly how Roberts will not stand for the cowardly Williams. He makes it clear that here Roberts only has hatred for the utterly horrendous human being that is Williams. The strength is within Connery's eyes here showing that Roberts will not suffer the fool of Williams no matter what, and there is always a quiet rebellion going on. Connery is excellent in portraying the intelligence of Roberts. Roberts has easily surmised exactly who Williams is and what his plan of attack on the prisoners is, and Connery never leaves any question to Roberts's strength that continues in the prison.

Connery is particularly superb though in the moment in which he describes the details of Roberts's cowardice charge and the reasoning behind his attack on his superior. What is notable here is that there is no passion in his portrayal, but rather a very sad cynicism. He does not infuse his action with any pride, not because he thinks he was wrong, but rather Connery instead shows that Roberts has made the heartbreaking discovery that despite his fervent attempts to save his men from a suicide mission, that it meant absolutely nothing in the long wrong as they still all died after someone else lead them in anyway.

Connery conveys though that his earlier experience is what sparks his passion to see that justice is done over the death of his fellow prisoner. Roberts finds his own punishment for speaking out, and in his scenes of pushing for justice most of it is speaking retching in pain over a beating he has been given. Connery is excellent here particularly in his scene where he confronts the Regimental Sergeant Major Wilson (Harry Andrews the head of the guards over the death. What is special here is Connery does not convey only anger here like he does in his scenes with Hendry, since Williams is a sadist and Wilson genuinely thinks his helping the men through his harsh treatment.

In his scene where he goes head to head with Wilson though is amazing as Connery shows Roberts basically fall apart in his frustrations over the failures of the code. This is a very different side to Connery here, but he is completely convincing as he shows that really Roberts feels that his whole life has been a falsehood because of the failure of the code he spent most of his life going by. It is an incredible scene because he combines not only his pain he is constantly feeling over his severe beating, but as well his despairing feelings toward the only thing that he has known for his entire life.

The late scenes though are possibly his best as Roberts lies wounded on the floor, but still uses his considerable will to prod the few good men of the prison to do the right thing. Connery through his very quiet portrayal here is superb as he brings to life the fierce determination of Roberts. There is nothing but power in his portrayal as he shows that no matter what Roberts will see justice done. He makes the sheer force of will of Roberts in this scene absolutely come to life, and makes his ability to bring the best out of the men completely believable. This is an excellent showcase of Connery's talent as he not only utilizes his more commonly found command of the screen, but as well effectively shows us that he is fully capable of creating an emotionally resonate character portrait.

Alternate Best Actor 1965

Saturday, July 14, 2012

And the Nominees Were Not:

Omar Sharif in Doctor Zhivago

Lee Van Cleef in For A Few Dollars More

Terence Stamp in The Collector

Sean Connery in The Hill

Michael Caine in The Ipcress File

Best Supporting Actor 1987: Results

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

5. Sean Connery in The Untouchables- Connery has little to do in his role besides act tough and give inspirational talks both which he does adequately enough but never to any sort of amazing degree.
4. Denzel Washington in Cry Freedom- Washington gives a fine quietly passionate performance that avoids the problems some of his other performances suffer from.
3. Vincent Gardenia in Moonstruck- Gardenia gives an effectively colorful performance that only succeeds in adding to his film.
2. Morgan Freeman in Street Smart- Freeman gives a great performance excelling in both showing the odd charm and charisma equally well with the terrifying brutality of the same man.
1. Albert Brooks in Broadcast News- This for me was a rather close choice between the top two, although I really should not have had to make because Brooks gives really more of a lead than a supporting performance. Brooks either way gives a great performance that balances the different aspects of his character making a winning performance. He gives a charming humorous performance that finds the right emotional tone throughout the film.
Deserving Performances:
Vincent D'Onofrio in Full Metal Jacket
R. Lee Ermey in Full Metal Jacket
Mandy Patinkin in The Princess Bride

Best Supporting Actor 1987: Sean Connery in The Untouchables

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Sean Connery won his Oscar from his only Oscar nomination so far for portraying Jimmy Malone in The Untouchables.

The Untouchables depicts the efforts of Elliot Ness (Kevin Costner) to take down crime boss Al Capone (Robert De Niro).

Sean Connery's nomination and win is a rather strange one because despite his long career that included many performances far better than this one he was nominated only for this performance as he street smart beat cop who shows Eliot Ness how to do things the Chicago way. The most notable thing really about this whole performance is the fact that for some reason this beat cop needed to be Irish therefore Connery had to do an Irish accent.

I really do not like to make a big deal about accents unless they really aid in a characterization like for example Al Pacino in a Dog Day Afternoon or if they are distracting because of how bad they are unfortunately Connery's accent falls into this latter category. Connery as he grew older his Scottish accent grew thicker and thicker, perhaps Connery could have done an accent back say in his Darby O'Gill days but this time in his career his accent was far too thick and distinct for him to attempt anything else.

All I can really think is why did they not just change the character's last name, and make him a Scottish cop that was all that was required. Instead Connery attempts an Irish accent over his Scottish that just comes off as awkward when it is apparent, but it is also exceedingly inconsistent. He loses constantly and quite randomly, and this whole problem only ever serves to take away from whatever else he might be doing with his performance. 

The rest of his performance is not remarkable either all he does is look and act tough and gives various talks just to toughen up Ness. No one should never sell short acting tough it is a harder really than it looks, and Connery certainly is good at it, but this not his best display of it. Also there are so many other times where he not only acts tough but has a fuller characterization otherwise than just tough honest cop. Otherwise than the accent Connery really is not bad, but there is nothing special about his work here, which is a shame since you might have noticed I have found Connery has given more than one deserving performance in many other years.

Best Supporting Actor 1987

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

And the Nominees Were:

Albert Brooks in Broadcast News

Denzel Washington in Cry Freedom

Sean Connery in The Untouchables

Vincent Gardenia in Moonstruck

Morgan Freeman in Street Smart

Early Connery

Friday, November 9, 2007

1962 moviegoers saw a nattily dressed actor named Sean Connery stroll through a London nightclub, have women swoon and fight over him, and wield a gun as if it were a natural extension of his arm. It’s not “Dr. No”, but a crime thriller he made a year earlier called “The Frightened City.”

I watched it the other night and it wasn’t very good, but it was interesting to see a pre-007 Connery on the other side of the law. In “The Frightened City” he plays an enforcer for the protection racket. You never saw a better dressed enforcer as Connery in this movie, and one wonders if the Bond producers saw it before offering him the James Bond role. I know I’ve read that they screened the Disney film “Darby O’Gill and the Little People” (1959) but that seems an atypical role for them to use a basis to pick their Bond. No, “The Frightened City” seems a more logical choice. You’ve got the London setting, the stylish clothes, the women, the gun. I don’t know if they did screen this film or not, but the evidence is there on screen.

The movie also stars Herbert Lom, and he’s a welcome presence in any movie, but the script is predictable and there’s not a whole lot memorable about it, save for Connery, who already exudes that charisma that would make him one of our greatest latter-day movie stars.

Rating for “The Frightened City”: Two stars.

I also recently watched via TCM’s Sean Connery day back in August a 1957 melodrama called “Hell Drivers” about the rough and ready world of professional truck drivers and their rivalries and jealousies. I was hoping for an English version of the great Warner Bros. trucking melodrama “They Drive by Night” (1940), but I’m afraid the proceedings were too joyless and serious for my taste. However, it did boast a marvelous cast: Stanley Baker, Peggy Cummins, Patrick McGooghan, Herbert Lom (again!), Sid James, David McCallum and a brunette Jill Ireland. Connery more than holds his own with these pros, but the 104-minute running time dragged for me. (The thick English accents didn’t help either).

Rating for “Hell Drivers”: Two stars.

The best pre-007 film Sean Connery starred in is arguably “Tarzan’s Greatest Adventure” (1959). Co-starring Gordon Scott as Tarzan and Anthony Quayle, this account of Tarzan tracking down a really vicious gang of criminals through the jungle is one of the best Tarzan movies since the immortal Johnny Weissmuller Tarzan classics “Tarzan the Ape Man” (1932) and “Tarzan and His Mate” (1934).

Filmed on location in Africa, “Tarzan’s Greatest Adventure” and its sister production “Tarzan the Magnificent” (1960) are long, long overdue for DVD release. Let’s hope Paramount starts digging into the vaults to release these gems.
 

Blogger news

Blogroll

Most Reading