Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Philip Seymour Hoffman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philip Seymour Hoffman. Show all posts

Best Supporting Actor 2012: Philip Seymour Hoffman in The Master

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Philip Seymour Hoffman received his fourth Oscar nomination for portraying Lancaster Dodd the titular character in The Master.

Philip Seymour Hoffman has already been nominated once before in a role many described as lead which was in 2008 for Doubt. The same has been said of this role here in The Master after all he is the title character. I would say it is not nearly as clear cut in this case as there is a clearer male lead in Joaquin Phoenix as drifter Freddie Quell. Hoffman though does have an ample of amount of screen time and many scenes devoted to himself. Nevertheless there are more scenes devoted to Freddie than the Master and in many of the scenes with both actors Dodd tends to be the one supporting Freddie in some way, and Freddie usually is the main focus of many, not all, of their scenes together.

I do think Hoffman's role can be reasonably taken either as supporting or lead as he does take over twenty minutes to appear in the film, but his impact is tremendous in the first scene where he speaks to Freddie. The voice that Hoffman uses here as Lancaster Dodd is masterstroke with his deep command that resounds in a special way that makes you listen to him no matter what he may be saying. In his first scene with Freddie, Hoffman gives Dodd an uncompromising stare that seems to delve deeper into this man's mind than one expect. Dodd describes himself as hopelessly inquisitive, and Hoffman holds this inquisition in the face of Lancaster Dodd that shows that Dodd is fascinated with this young man.

In his earliest scenes Hoffman is a charismatic giant as he goes about the ship with an absolute sway. He is the Master of these people, and Hoffman portrays exactly why and how this is. There is a likability to Dodd here seeming like he only wishes well for his followers, and besides his words at the wedding there is nothing that would make one really too suspicious of this man. Hoffman is very welcoming in these scenes in a special way having a warmth among the group, and making it especially easy to believe how so many of these people would look right up to him. Hoffman makes Dodd a fascinating enigma here as he should be to both Freddie and the audience. Hoffman makes a wondrous impression leaving Dodd as someone we only wish to know more about.

One of the strongest scenes in the film takes place in early in the film when Dodd decides to have Freddie undergo his treatment known as processing. This scene is a unique pairing of actors with Phoenix's wild performance (which I will get to soon), and Hoffman's more restrained performance as Dodd. What is amazing about Hoffman here is the fact that he is never forgotten in these scenes despite the camera lingering mostly on Freddie. Hoffman makes Dodd this persistent force in these scenes and an incisive man who keeps piercing through the defensive to find whatever truth Freddie may hold. Hoffman brings this processing to life in a vivid way through his strict portrayal of Dodd's method which is uncompromising and extremely powerful to witness.

Hoffman does something very important in these scenes which is to have all the conviction possible in a human being. He does not seem to portray even the slightest doubt as he speaks about his theories of time and the past lives of individuals for over a trillion years. Hoffman gives such an assurance to Lancaster Dodd that fully realizes the potential of this character. He has a such a significant pull and sway that it is so easy to see how Freddie would be as captivated as he is. For a man who is filled with only doubts and hesitations of his life, Hoffman makes Dodd the perfect representation of the opposite. Hoffman allows Dodd to be the man who seems to seem to have all of the knowledge that he claims to have. Hoffman allows Dodd to be just as he should be.

Of course after they leave the boat we soon see the greater truth behind Dodd in one scene where a man questions his ideas behind his religion the Cause. Hoffman is tremendous in this scene as he shows how slowly Dodd begins to burn beneath the surface, and finds himself barely able to keep himself together as he ineffectually defends his ideas against scrutiny. When he finally does lose his hold on his anger we see a very different Dodd than the man we first met from the start. His voice loses his pitch, he loses his empowered demeanor, he resorts to the lowest form of insult against the man. Hoffman is brilliant because it is just for the slightest moment that portrays Dodd's loss of his Svengali like power, and reduces to basically an uncultured louse.

From that moment on Dodd just is never quite the same anymore, even though Hoffman shows him to be a man who tries to cover for himself very quickly. The simple fact of the matter is though the unblemished armor Hoffman made on the ship we first meet him on begins to quickly show kinks in this armor that never becomes repaired. Hoffman carefully rebuilds Dodd back to the way he was, but it is clear that there is more of a facade to the man than there seemed to be originally. There is a much darker side conveyed about Dodd after this scene that does not ignore those who disagree with him but instead seems to want to possibly violently injure them. There is a raging deep rooted vile within Hoffman portrayal of Dodd that suggests if he was truly in a position of power he could be capable of horrible things.

In the scenes with his congregation later Hoffman still shows to be a charismatic individual once again, but this time Hoffman carefully suggests a lesser man. As he sings his songs and looks among his congregation of many women, there is less the look of a passionate leader of these people, and more of that who is perhaps interested in these women as a lecher rather than a teacher. This leads to the very disturbing scene where his wife Peggy (Amy Adams) pleasures him well threatens him putting in him in his place, and importantly in this scene Hoffman alludes even more to the truth behind Lancaster Dodd. In this scene Dodd seems in a way a pawn himself not to his wife exactly, but to his own cult he has created. Hoffman is compelling because he allows us to see that perhaps he is not even able to escape what he has created.

The pivotal part of the film is of course the relationship between Freddie and Hoffman and we see that Dodd sees Freddie as more than just another member. This all seems to start in the scene when both end up briefly imprisoned, with Freddie out of control, we see more of Dodd once again. Hoffman again shows that when Dodd's charisma is failing him he quickly reduces to an uncultured and uncouth man just sprawling insults in an entirely unrefined manner that perhaps is the true Dodd. As he loses it with Freddie in the cell we still see him attempting to hold onto his task, although in a very different way. In this case he does it with none of the style or suave behavior he exhibited before instead showing Dodd just an average man trying to calm down the out of control Freddie simply by saying he is the only man who likes him.

A great portion of the film ends up being Dodd's attempt to reform Freddie and make him a true member of the cause. Hoffman cleverly leaves a nice bit of interpretation for why Dodd tries so hard to change Freddie in, and allows several conclusions. One being that it is simply to show of the power of the Cause, that is possible not entirely satisfactory to the complex way that Hoffman portrays Dodd. It could be that Dodd feels that if he can't bring Freddie around it proves his own weakness, again Hoffman allows this to be part of it but not the whole. Hoffman subtly suggests that Dodd has a certain connection to the wild man Freddie, something Dodd never could really be. Hoffman creates this underlying force that brings him to want to hold Freddie in his power, because perhaps in a way Freddie is the sort of man Dodd would like to be but never could be.

Again we see Dodd work his ways with Freddie and the full force of the cult at hand. Hoffman portrays Dodd in his ways as he pressures every aspect of the training to make Freddie part of the Cause. Hoffman once again brings to life the full extent of the power within Lancaster Dodd's method. In this case Hoffman makes it less of one powered attack as with the original processing but rather a slower deliberate process of forceful indoctrination. Again Hoffman makes the sway the techniques have on Freddie believable due to the confidence and strength Hoffman brings to the proceedings. In these scenes Hoffman pulls the strings allowing Dodd to be The Master of his cult as he organizes all of them around bringing Freddie into the fold.

Later on Dodd decides to release the second part of his manifesto to the public, and before he goes out to his people we see him brewing alone briefly. This scene is pivotal to Dodd, and though a silent moment Hoffman is excellent in showing the struggle in Dodd's mind in the moment. Here more than any other scene he suggests Dodd own doubts about himself, in this moment lacking that conviction of the cult leader of before. Instead he portrays the true man of the moment, a man no longer entranced by his own abilities instead allowing the flaws of his own concepts brewing in his mind in a way that leaves him a far different man than the over confidence from the beginning. After this moment he comes out in his empowered way, but Hoffman powerfully makes this far more of an act than ever before.

Hoffman is allowed once last scene of Dodd meeting Freddie for the last time. This is an outstanding scene by Hoffman as he creates the end of Dodd. Hoffman verbally displays a certain hatred and violence toward Freddie for leaving him, but in the same moment displays Dodd's fatal attempt to bring in Freddie to the fold once more. Both attempt by Dodd seem in a strange way half-hearted by the expression of his face. Hoffman is spectacular in expressing the idea that Dodd is perhaps in a prison himself by the way he seems not to be holding back hatred this time but perhaps a warmth toward Freddie that he must keep in place knowing that he must reject the type of man Freddie is to keep within his cult. It is a brilliant end to his performance making an understanding of how such a man as Lancaster Dodd could exist as well as how such a man could become trapped by the very thing he created. This is tremendous portrait of such a man by Philip Seymour Hoffman that realizes such a difficult character with believability and a complexity that is astonishing.

Best Supporting Actor 2012

Thursday, January 10, 2013

And the Nominees Are:

Alan Arkin in Argo

Philip Seymour Hoffman in The Master

Tommy Lee Jones in Lincoln

Robert De Niro in Silver Linings Playbook

Christoph Waltz in Django Unchained 

A LATE QUARTET

Monday, November 19, 2012

A LATE QUARTET
Written by Seth Grossman and Yaron Zilberman
Directed by Yaron Zilberman
Starring Christopher Walken, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Catherine Keener and Mark Ivanir

At the onset of first time narrative filmmaker, Yaron Zilberman’s A LATE QUARTET, Peter Mitchell (Christopher Walken), tells his Juilliard class the story of Beethoven’s “Opus 131”. This particular piece, written specifically for a string quartet, is a challenge for even the most seasoned musician. For Beethoven wrote it without any places to break throughout the atypical seven movements. Peter, a celebrated cellist himself, asks his class to imagine what it must be like to get through such a piece, what with no opportunity to retune your instrument while playing non-stop. He asks his class but in fact, it is Zilberman’s audience that is truly being asked the question. A LATE QUARTET is his answer.

The Fugues is a string quartet that has been performing together for now 25 years. The players that make it up are some of the finest in the world and the same can be said for the actors portraying them. Walken, who anchors this emotionally unwieldy film, is joined by Philip Seymour Hoffman, Catherine Keener and the reasonably lesser know, Mark Ivanir. When we first meet them, it is evident that they are a close group, that they know how each other plays and how to play together while elevating the group as a whole. Musical symbolism is abound in A LATE QUARTET - Is first violin higher in rank than second? Is it better to play perfectly or to take risks? - and, at first, the questions are subtle and insightful. As time goes on, say around the third or fourth movement, if you will, Zilberman starts to lean toward the melodramatic. Suddenly, this composed, elegant effort is turning into a “VH1 Behind the Music” special for the classical crowd.


As the quartet readies for their 25th season, Peter, who is much older than the remaining members, is diagnosed with the early stages of Parkinson’s. As he respects the music above all else, he announces to his longtime friends and colleagues that he will do everything in his power to play with them on their first concert, but that this will be his last. Naturally, this throws everyone off and the question becomes whether the quartet should continue at all. This threat to the comfort and world they’ve all known for so long brings all of their insecurities to the surface and poses the film’s most pertinent question about the role of the individual within a larger group. With so much emotion to balance, Zilberman demonstrates great promise as a director but he still needs some more practice before he tackles his next opus.



THE MASTER

Thursday, September 20, 2012

THE MASTER
Written and Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson
Starring Joaquin Phoenix, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Amy Adams

Lancaster Dodd: Man is not an animal. We are not a part of the animal kingdom.

One of today’s most remarkable American film directors, Paul Thomas Anderson, returns with yet another majestic work, that is both visually stunning and psychologically enthralling. THE MASTER pits a disturbed and unhinged former sailor, just back from the war, against the intellectual and commanding leader of a budding religious group, and it is never quite clear just who is playing who. As the film inevitably lingers on in your mind after it’s done though, it becomes clear that there really only was one master all along, and that is undeniably, Mr. Anderson himself.

THE MASTER marks a very welcome return to narrative filmmaking for Joaquin Phoenix, who plays the aforementioned sailor, Freddie Quell. He struggles to find his path as he attempts reintegration into society after WWII, drifting from one pointless job to the next, as he inevitably makes a mess of each opportunity he’s given. He is prone to aggressive and violent outbursts and thanks to Phoenix’s stone cold expression, it is near impossible to tell whether he intentionally means to lash out or whether he truly cannot control himself. While lost on land, he finds himself again at sea, on a boat commandeered by one Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman), the aforementioned, and self-proclaimed, religious leader. Dodd has founded The Cause and aims to integrate Quell into his fold by healing the demons of his past. Much to Dodd’s dismay though, some demons cannot be tamed.


The Cause is a religion founded in the 1950’s that helps its practitioners return to their true selves through a series of exercises designed to conquer the lingering effects of past trauma. Anderson insists that The Cause is not a thinly veiled attempt at criticizing the controversial religion known as Scientology, but that just doesn’t ring true. Scientology was also formed in the 1950’s and also employs similar methods, known as auditing, which essentially accomplish the same task I just described. It seems silly to look at THE MASTER as anything other than a judgmental look at Scientology really. While it is a fascinating character piece, as Anderson’s films generally are, Dodd’s difficulty rehabilitating the deranged Quell, points to undeniable flaws in his system. If all mankind is eternal, then we should all be able to find our way back from our animalistic behaviour and toward our true, honest selves.


As technically perfect as it is, THE MASTER is the least emotionally engaging film of Anderson’s I’ve seen. I was so locked in on a cerebral level, overwhelmed by the brilliant cinematography (presented in 70MM and shot by Mihai Malaimaire Jr.), another obscurely melodic score by Jonny Greenwood (Radiohead, THERE WILL BE BLOOD) and unforgettable  performances from actors at the top of their game (including Amy Adams, as Dodd’s submissive yet dominant wife, Peggy Dodd). Still, I was somewhat taken aback when it ended. I felt as though there was more to this story that had yet to be told. Repeat viewings will likely prove me wrong, as Anderson is in full control of his facilities, but for all its prowess, THE MASTER left me a little cold. Anderson may be a true movie making master, but if he relinquishes just a little bit of control, he might unleash a genius we have never known the likes of. Hell, if he does that, he may even lead his own religion some day.



205. The Master

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

205. (16 Sep) The Master (2012, Paul Thomas Anderson)* 76



It's not disappointing to see Paul Thomas Anderson in such similar territory to There Will Be Blood, but the earlier film's such a stronger indictment of religion and a more ordered, compelling narrative. It's still extraordinary to see Joaquin Phoenix and Philip Seymour Hoffman build off one another's performances with such collaborative spirit. The deprogramming scene, in particular, is an acting master class. Each man's use of charisma to different ends is intriguing enough and there's much to be said for the strength of Anderson's script. However, the film's final third feels sluggish, distractingly on-the-nose when when Amy Adams delivers a monologue in her last scene. Adams seems slightly out of place here, simply not keeping up with her co-stars. With the most limited of screentime, Laura Dern makes a far better impression. It's difficult to imagine anything will come close to matching Mihai Malaimare Jr.'s perfect cinematography.

Best Supporting Actor 2008: Results

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

5. Michael Shannon in Revolutionary Road- Shannon gives an intense performance that serves the film the way it wants him to, I only wish his depiction of the mentally instability man could have been a little less obvious display of acting.
4. Phillip Seymour Hoffman in Doubt- Phillip Seymour Hoffman gives an effective performance that succeeds in treading the fine line to keep the mystery of his character intact without making his performance seem lacking.
3. Josh Brolin in Milk- Josh Brolin although has a very limited screen time that realizes the standard politician on the outside as well as the lonely unhappy man on the inside.
2. Robert Downey Jr. in Tropic Thunder- Robert Downey Jr. gives a very enjoyable and entertaining performance by portraying a character who is entirely there to be funny by portraying him with the utmost conviction and devotion.
1. Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight- Excellent prediction Eddie. Heath Ledger simply gives an outstanding performance. Ledger never tries for a moment to portray the Joker in a safe fashion. Every risk that he takes with the performance that absolutely succeeds in creating a chilling entertaining and very memorable villain.
Deserving Performances:
Ralph Fiennes in In Bruges
Brad Pitt in Burn After Reading
Gary Oldman in The Dark Knight

Best Supporting Actor 2008: Philip Seymour Hoffman in Doubt

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Philip Seymour Hoffman received his third Oscar nomination for portraying Father Brendan Flynn in Doubt.

Doubt details the strict Sister Aloysius' (Meryl Streep) suspicions about her parish and school's priest around his relationship with one of the students.

Philip Seymour Hoffman portrays the priest who may or may not be a child molester it is never made absolutely clear either way. Hoffman is careful to portray Father Flynn as just an average priest early on in the film. There is an innate friendliness in his performance that is fitting of his priest who wants to make the church come off that way to outsiders as well as the parents of the children in the school. In addition to this in his sermon scenes Hoffman has a confidence as well an understated passion that is a perfect fit for his priest.

Hoffman early though leaves his character open to interpretation just enough without ever seeming like an obvious problem in anyway. There does always seem to be something else about Father Flynn in Hoffman's portrayal that never leaves him as a black or white figure but a man of grey. Hoffman carefully conveys this in just his early moments such as when he is talking to the boys about dating or even just teaching them about basketball. Hoffman finds just the right approach here because he technically does not seem to say anything precisely, but yet he still conveys the idea that there is something more to Father Flynn.

Philip Seymour Hoffman's performance greatest challenge comes when he may or may not have committed a crime. Hoffman neither confirms or denies his crime at any moment in his performance. This is something very difficult to be able to do without falling one way the other, the best portrayal of this is obviously Jeremy Irons in Reversal of Fortune, Hoffman here is not quite on Irons level yet his portrayal of Flynn's possible guilt is well handled. Hoffman does carefully suggests guilt in a way but not necessarily guilt in terms of what he is being accused of, but possibly guilt because of some feeling for the crime not because he actually did it. Hoffman leaves Flynn properly open to interpretation.

Many of Hoffman's pivotal scenes though come in his confrontational moments with Meryl Streep's Sister Aloysius. These scenes are really are as much of their character's conflict as the actors conflict over their styles in the scene. Meryl Streep here has the accent and the greater degree of theatrics which makes sense for her character who always wants her presence to be known as well as wants things done her way, Hoffman on the other hand downplays his half of the conflict. Hoffman makes Flynn almost trying to avoid the conflict with the sister, and constantly trying just to calm the situation more than outright attack the sister back on her terms.

It is a very effective approach that works well in contrast to Streep's approach that creates an interesting dynamic between the two. Hoffman with ease shows the great emotional range that Father Flynn goes through in just a single scene. From his early moments of trying to be just dismissive, to soon becoming more frustrated and angry while showing an underlying guilt of some sort at the same time. Hoffman is extremely effective because he moves through this emotions with absolute realism. There is no disconnect in his performance but rather every emotion is all part of Father Flynn's troubled reaction to the accusations made against him.

Hoffman is able to handle all of the difficulties of the role in strive never falling into any sort of obvious trap one way or another in terms of his character. He completely fulfills the challenges of the role and achieves precisely what he needs to with the role of Father Flynn. If I were to complain about the performance, and really I do not need to as he he gives a very strong performance, is I could not help feeling it could have perhaps been even better of one than it already is. It is not to say there is a single problem with his performance, there really isn't, only could not help but feel with such a character it could have been an absolutely stunning performance instead of just a very good one. I can't even identify really what exactly stops him from going further I really can't, but in the end I can't shake the feeling that perhaps he could have. Nevertheless this is a strong performance from Hoffman and should be recognized as such.

Best Supporting Actor 2008

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

And the Nominees Were:

Josh Brolin in Milk

Philip Seymour Hoffman in Doubt

Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight

Michael Shannon in Revolutionary Road

Robert Downey Jr. in Tropic Thunder

Best of Black Sheep: THE IDES OF MARCH

Monday, January 30, 2012


THE IDES OF MARCH
Written by George Clooney, Grant Heslov and Beau Willimon
Directed by George Clooney
Starring Ryan Gosling, George Clooney, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Evan Rachel Wood


Stephen Myers: Nothing bad happens when you’re doing the right thing.
Governor Mike Morris: Is that your personal theory because I can poke holes in it.

George Clooney has been mulling making THE IDES OF MARCH for a few years now. When he first wanted to make it in 2008, he decided to put his plans on hold because of the political climate. The United States were on the cusp of a monumental election and a financial crisis and he did not want to take advantage of either. Three years later though, Clooney and his longtime production partner, Grant Heslov (GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK) think the timing is now right to unveil their political thriller to the voting public. Apparently, it is acceptable to be critical of their government again.

Clooney plays Governor Mike Morris, a seemingly genuine and upstanding gentleman, who is trying to secure the democratic party nomination for the upcoming presidential race. Naturally, nothing is as it seems and it would appear that no one can get to such great heights without stepping over a few people along the way. To get where he is, you also need a crack team behind you and Governor Morris’ includes actors as diverse and talented as Ryan Gosling, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Evan Rachel Wood. Hoffman is the veteran, Wood is the intern and Gosling is the shiny new guy who is clearly on his way to greater things. In fact, Gosling’s career appears to mirror the position of his character, Stephen Myers. The man is certainly on his own streak and his lead performance here is another that will certainly continue to propel him forward.


THE IDES OF MARCH is a compelling and engaging thriller, despite not bringing much new to the table. Gosling’s Stephen gets caught up in the political crossfire behind the campaign scenes and it becomes a pretty harrowing challenge for him to ensure he still comes out ahead of everyone else. And while Clooney’s execution is smooth and effective, it does cater a little too often to his own political views. Clooney did not want his character to be a republican as he thought the criticism would be too obvious. As a democrat though, he gets the chance to voice all of platforms on topics as heated as gay marriage and tax incentives for the super rich. Everything he says seems so sensible, the film becomes something of a criticism for all politicians, as if to suggest it could be as easy as he claims if they would just get it together. And while Clooney may not be ready to run for president, he earns my vote for being a top notch film director.


428. The Ides of March

Friday, October 14, 2011

428. (09 Oct) The Ides of March (2011, George Clooney)* 57



Clooney's on the nose political thriller is glossy and entertaining enough to suggest growth from his pedestrian Good Night, and Good Luck, but the script still lacks character motivation and feels too overeager to crowd please. At the very least, Clooney has something of a knack of assembling a strong ensemble and putting them to good use. While Ryan Gosling looks as vacant as ever, Evan Rachel Wood has rarely been so charming and emotionally affecting. Marisa Tomei is also rather fun in a small role. Philip Seymour Hoffman turns out the kind of noisy, showy performance that seems destined for an unnecessary Supporting Actor nomination.

The twists and turns of the film's third act are relatively weak, even if they are involving. The Ides of March is convinced of its own grittiness and cynicism, even though it's not really either. The idea that you can make anything about the film's plot fresh is a tad absurd. A politician sleeping with an intern? Been there. A campaign manager who has yet to be disillusioned by the politician he's managing? Get real.

Ides just doesn't feel particularly real, which is why whenever it enters dark territory it starts to feel false. When it's more a dopey, enjoyable look behind the scenes of politics, it's at its best.

428. The Ides of March

Monday, October 10, 2011

428. (09 Oct) The Ides of March (2011, George Clooney)* 57

THE IDES OF MARCH

Wednesday, October 5, 2011


Written by George Clooney, Grant Heslov and Beau Willimon
Directed by George Clooney
Starring Ryan Gosling, George Clooney, Philip Seymour Hoffman 
and Evan Rachel Wood


Stephen Myers: Nothing bad happens when you’re doing the right thing.
Governor Mike Morris: Is that your personal theory because I can poke holes in it.

George Clooney has been mulling making THE IDES OF MARCH for a few years now. When he first wanted to make it in 2008, he decided to put his plans on hold because of the political climate. The United States were on the cusp of a monumental election and a financial crisis and he did not want to take advantage of either. Three years later though, Clooney and his longtime production partner, Grant Heslov (GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK) think the timing is now right to unveil their political thriller to the voting public. Apparently, it is acceptable to be critical of their government again.


Clooney plays Governor Mike Morris, a seemingly genuine and upstanding gentleman, who is trying to secure the democratic party nomination for the upcoming presidential race. Naturally, nothing is as it seems and it would appear that no one can get to such great heights without stepping over a few people along the way. To get where he is, you also need a crack team behind you and Governor Morris’ includes actors as diverse and talented as Ryan Gosling, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Evan Rachel Wood. Hoffman is the veteran, Wood is the intern and Gosling is the shiny new guy who is clearly on his way to greater things. In fact, Gosling’s career appears to mirror the position of his character, Stephen Myers. The man is certainly on his own streak and his lead performance here is another that will certainly continue to propel him forward.



THE IDES OF MARCH is a compelling and engaging thriller, despite not bringing much new to the table. Gosling’s Stephen gets caught up in the political crossfire behind the campaign scenes and it becomes a pretty harrowing challenge for him to ensure he still comes out ahead of everyone else. And while Clooney’s execution is smooth and effective, it does cater a little too often to his own political views. Clooney did not want his character to be a republican as he thought the criticism would be too obvious. As a democrat though, he gets the chance to voice all of his platforms on topics as heated as gay marriage and tax incentives for the super rich. Everything he says seems so sensible, the film becomes something of a criticism for all politicians, as if to suggest it could be as easy as he claims if they would just get it together. And while Clooney may not be ready to run for president, he earns my vote for being a top notch film director.

MONEYBALL

Friday, September 23, 2011

Written by Steve Zaillian and Aaron Sorkin
Directed by Bennett Miller
Starring Brad Pitt, Johan Hill and Philip Seymour Hoffman


Billy Beane: There are rich teams; there are poor teams; then there’s fifty feet of crap; and then there’s us.

These days, it seems that when it comes to conversations about the American economy, the focus is on the increasing divide between the rich and the poor. In MONEYBALL, that same gap is affecting America’s favourite pass time, baseball. How can a team that only has $40 million to pay its players possibly compete with teams that have three times that amount at their disposal? The answer is simple. Input everything you know about the players into a computer and let it do all the thinking for you. And once you have all your algorithms in place, you can apply them to the sport and rob it of all spontaneity and excitement.


Unfortunately, some of the fun and excitement that usually spills over from the sport itself into the baseball movie genre, has also disappeared from MONEYBALL. Bennett Miller’s second film after his incredible debut, CAPOTE, is a succinct account of how former Oakland Athletics general manager, Billy Beane (Brad Pitt), changed the way major league baseball teams were formed in 2002. Inspired by a concept that was brought to him by his new assistant (Jonah Hill), Beane began adding players to his roster who were notorious for getting on base. The logic was that these players cost way less and produced more consistent, if not necessarily showy, results. MONEYBALL then becomes a waiting game to see if his theory pays off and less about the actual success of the players themselves.


Pitt gives a fine performance as the frustrated Beane, choosing to play most of his struggle internally while presenting with great confidence to all who doubt him. As strong as his performance is, it is not as impressively nuanced as the turn given by Philip Seymour Hoffman as the unfortunate coach who has to play with Beane’s team of mismatched baseball rejects. Even Hill shines as a young actor who is showing more and more promise in dramatic parts. No, the trouble with MONEYBALL is not the acting but rather the thin subtext of the script. Having gone through three hands before going into production, it comes across as self-important but doesn’t have the gravitas to back it up. As a result, MONEYBALL is solid entertainment, but it never manages to crack it out of the park.

TIFF Review: THE IDES OF MARCH

Friday, September 9, 2011

Written by George Clooney, Grant Heslov and Beau Willimon
Directed by George Clooney
Starring Ryan Gosling, George Clooney, Philip Seymour Hoffman 
and Evan Rachel Wood


Stephen Myers: Nothing bad happens when you’re doing the right thing.
Governor Mike Morris: Is that your personal theory because I can poke holes in it.

George Clooney has been mulling making THE IDES OF MARCH for a few years now. When he first wanted to make it in 2008, he decided to put his plans on hold because of the political climate. The United States were on the cusp of a monumental election and a financial crisis and he did not want to take advantage of either. Three years later though, Clooney and his longtime production partner, Grant Heslov (GOOD NIGHT, AND GOOD LUCK) think the timing is now right to unveil their political thriller to the voting public. Apparently, it is acceptable to be critical of their government again.


Clooney plays Governor Mike Morris, a seemingly genuine and upstanding gentleman, who is trying to secure the democratic party nomination for the upcoming presidential race. Naturally, nothing is as it seems and it would appear that no one can get to such great heights without stepping over a few people along the way. To get where he is, you also need a crack team behind you and Governor Morris’ includes actors as diverse and talented as Ryan Gosling, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Evan Rachel Wood. Hoffman is the veteran, Wood is the intern and Gosling is the shiny new guy who is clearly on his way to greater things. In fact, Gosling’s career appears to mirror the position of his character, Stephen Myers. The man is certainly on his own streak and his lead performance here is another that will certainly continue to propel him forward.



THE IDES OF MARCH is a compelling and engaging thriller, despite not bringing much new to the table. Gosling’s Stephen gets caught up in the political crossfire behind the campaign scenes and it becomes a pretty harrowing challenge for him to ensure he still comes out ahead of everyone else. And while Clooney’s execution is smooth and effective, it does cater a little too often to his own political views. Clooney did not want his character to be a republican as he thought the criticism would be too obvious. As a democrat though, he gets the chance to voice all of his platforms on topics as heated as gay marriage and tax incentives for the super rich. Everything he says seems so sensible, the film becomes something of a criticism for all politicians, as if to suggest it could be as easy as he claims if they would just get it together. And while Clooney may not be ready to run for president, he earns my vote for being a top notch film director.

 

Blogger news

Blogroll

Most Reading