Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Viggo Mortensen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Viggo Mortensen. Show all posts

Alternate Best Actor 2005: Results

Friday, December 14, 2012

5. Guy Pearce in The Proposition- Pearce gives a strong understated performance that is particularly effective in portraying the complex relationship that motivates his character.
4. Robert Downey Jr. in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang- Downey could not be better in his role finding just the perfect tone for the film.
3. Tommy Lee Jones in The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada- Jones perfectly cast himself portraying the complex motivations of his character brilliantly.
2. Viggo Mortensen in A History of Violence- Mortensen is terrific in his depiction of the slow dissolution of his character.
1. Ray Winstone in The Proposition- The underrated Ray Winstone wins this year with his powerful performance as a man trying to bring the law to the lawless. Winstone succeeds far more than anyone would expect creating a poignant depiction of a character that could perhaps have been a throwaway in lesser hands.
  1. Ray Winstone in The Proposition
  2. Viggo Mortensen in A History of Violence
  3. Philip Seymour Hoffman in Capote
  4. Tommy Lee Jones in The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada
  5. Heath Ledger in Brokeback Mountain
  6. Robert Downey Jr. in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
  7. Guy Pearce in The Proposition
  8. Brendan Gleeson in Six Shooter
  9. Russell Crowe in Cinderella Man
  10. Ralph Fiennes in The Constant Gardener 
  11. Pierce Brosnan in The Matador
  12. Jake Gyllenhaal in Brokeback Mountain
  13. Eric Bana in Munich
  14. David Strathairn in Good Night and Good Luck
  15. Christian Bale in Batman Begins
  16. Joaquin Phoenix in Walk the Line
  17. Greg Kinnear in The Matador
  18. Jesse Eisenberg in The Squid and the Whale
  19. Tom Cruise in The War of the Worlds
  20. William Moseley in The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe  
  21. Adrien Brody in King Kong
  22. Matt Damon in Syriana
  23. Daniel Radcliffe in The Goblet of Fire 
  24. Terrence Howard in Hustle and Flow
  25. Johnny Depp in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
  26. Hayden Christensen in Revenge of the Sith
Next Year: 2005 Supporting

Alternate Best Actor 2005: Viggo Mortensen in A History of Violence

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Viggo Mortensen did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Tom Stall or is he Joey Cusack in A History of Violence.

Viggo Mortensen portrays at the beginning of the film Tom Stall a man who lives in a small town is happily married with two children, and runs a diner. Mortensen portrays Tom Stall as pretty much an every man. Mortensen plays him straight as just an average man living his life, there seems to be no play, and there is no suggestion that one should suspect anything from him. He just seems to be a man enjoying his rather simple life, and there is not a reason that there is any man other than the one we are seeing in this man. One might think he should show shades here, but really Mortensen does well by not doing because there are no suspicious of Tom Stall who likes his life.

His good life he is living is shattered though when late at night two violent men come into the diner to rob the place. Tom springs into action saving the people in the diner by killing the two men. Mortensen here shows the prominent physical aspect of his performance, as he shows Tom here act with precision. There is no hesitation just an instant and immediate kill. Importantly here Mortensen does not show this to be an act of violence though, but rather a gut level act of desperation. A hidden ability comes out in Stall with Mortensen portrayal more than anything else. He displays part of the history of violence not the whole of it.

Mortensen is very good as soon as this scenes ends showing a change in Stall, and an underlying sense of doubt on the man comes over. Now there does seem to be flaws that appear in the happy average man, as Mortensen conveys a growing sense of paranoia as well as starts to show that the happy man starts to seem at least partially a facade. The happiness seems quite drained, and all of sudden he seems far less assured. Mortensen is particularly effective when Tom is confronted by mobsters from Philadelphia who claim that he is one Joey Cusack. Mortensen shows well the way Tom denials although believable enough to everyone else, there is a clear weakness that would never convince the mobsters.

Mortensen does well in portraying though the frustrations that Tom faces as he deals with the trauma caused by the mobsters harassing his family, as he knows shows a bit of desperation as he tries to deal with his family even though they are no longer convinced that he does not have a past with the men. Mortensen is terrific as he portrays Tom's resolve to deny the men starts to wain until the point the mobsters directly threaten him and his family if he does not go with them to Philadelphia. Mortensen in this scene as he brutally kills the gangsters now shows his violence as not only assured but something entirely of his own. There is not even a desperation shown in his brutal attacks now, but instead he shows himself to be the violent man that the mobsters had claimed him to be.

After killing the gangsters though the average man seems to become wholly a facade, and Mortensen basically eases into Joey as he lets go when he tells the truth to his wife (Maria Bello). Mortensen brilliantly portrays the scene as almost a relief to be able to tell someone who he is. Mortensen though properly still shows that this is to say Tom was not a real person, he most certainly assures that the new him is something he very much earned founded in when he says he killed Joey, but Mortensen makes it clear that at this point the man is both Tom and Joey at once. Mortensen handles this all incredibly well because he perfectly conveys the internal struggle between the two forces as he tries to remain calm and understanding toward his family as Tom would, but also has the moments of brutality like Joey would.

The real meeting of the two men comes down to when he goes to meet his mob boss brother Richie (William Hurt) to sort things out. Mortensen and Hurt are excellent in the scene as the two instantly create the love hate relationship history the two have with one another. Mortensen though also importantly here shows Tom/Joey almost settling into a single man. In the scene Mortensen portrays properly an acceptance Tom has of Joey's history as there are no denials, and he fully embraces his brother. At the same time Mortensen shows that his Tom side is always very much there in his eyes as he tries to make peace with his brother, as well as when he quietly says he sees the good in a marriage. After this scene the film really leaves us on a ambiguous note for both the film, and with Mortensen's performance, which is really the right way to end the film as after the events neither Tom or Joey could be completely forgotten.

Alternate Best Actor 2005

Friday, December 7, 2012

And the Nominees Were Not:

Guy Pearce in The Proposition

Ray Winstone in The Proposition 

Viggo Mortensen in A History of Violence

Tommy Lee Jones in The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada

Robert Downey Jr. in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2011: Results

Thursday, November 8, 2012

5. John Hawkes in Martha Marcy May Marlene- Hawkes combines effortlessly a charming and threatening personality in his portrayal of a cult leader.
4. Viggo Mortensen in A Dangerous Method- Mortensen gives a strong performance as Sigmund Freud succeeding well in creating the charismatic and persuasive personality of the man.
3. Bryan Cranston in Drive- Cranston even with his limited screen time creates both an enthusiastic as well as tragic presence in his film.
2. Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life- Pitt gives an astonishing performance and fully realizes his character despite limitations created by the direction of the film.
1. Mart Strong in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy- Strong wins this year for me, even with Brooks who on re-watch I still love, and give a 5, but he is no longer my favorite of the year. That goes to Strong even though it is close very close among the top three. Strong is my favorite though who gives an absolutely masterful performance, there is not a wasted moment or even a single facial gesture in his portrayal.
Overall Rank:
  1. Mark Strong in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  2. Albert Brooks in Drive
  3. Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life
  4. Bryan Cranston in Drive
  5. Tom Hardy in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy 
  6. Viggo Mortensen in A Dangerous Method
  7. John Hurt in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy 
  8. John Hawkes in Martha Marcy May Marlene
  9. Don Cheadle in The Guard
  10. Benedict Cumberbatch in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  11. Ben Kingsley in Hugo
  12. Colin Firth in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  13. Kenneth Branagh in My Week With Marilyn
  14. Max Von Sydow in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close 
  15. Corey Stoll in Midnight in Paris
  16. Toby Jones in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  17. Christopher Plummer in The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo
  18. David Dencik in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  19. Alan Rickman in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part II
  20. Liam Cunningham in The Guard
  21. Kevin Bacon in X-Men First Class
  22. James Cromwell in The Artist
  23. Mark Strong in The Guard
  24. Paul Giamatti in The Ides of March
  25. Stellan Skarsgard in The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
  26. Ron Perlman in Drive 
  27. Laurence Fishburne in Contagion 
  28. Philip Seymour Hoffman in The Ides of March
  29. Robert Forster in The Descendants
  30. Oscar Isaac in Drive
  31. Chris Cooper in The Muppets
  32. Matt Damon in Contagion 
  33. Christopher Plummer in Beginners
  34. Matthew Lewis in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part II
  35. Ciaran Hinds in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
  36. Jeffrey Wright in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
  37. George Clooney in Ides of March
  38. Yorick van Wageningen in The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo
  39. Nick Nolte in Warrior
  40. David Wilmot in The Guard 
  41. Sacha Baron Cohen in Hugo
  42. Vincent Cassel in A Dangerous Method
  43. Tom Hiddleston in War Horse 
  44. Sean Penn in The Tree of Life
  45. Matthew Lillard in The Descendants 
  46. Jonah Hill in Moneyball
  47. Jude Law in Contagion
  48. Tom Hiddleston in Midnight in Paris
  49. Philip Seymour Hoffman in Moneyball
  50. John Goodman in The Artist
  51. Beau Bridges in The Descendants
  52. Ralph Fiennes in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part II
  53. Toby Jones in Captain America
  54. Josh Lucas in J. Edgar
  55. Michael Sheen in Midnight in Paris
  56. Tom Hanks in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
  57. Tommy Lee Jones in Captain American
  58. Nicholas Hoult in X-Men First Class
  59. Armie Hammer in J. Edgar 
  60. Dominic Cooper in Captain America
  61. Hugo Weaving in Captain America
  62. Hugh Dancy in Martha Marcy May Marlene
  63. Peter Mullan in War Horse
  64. David Thewlis in War Horse
  65. Jim Broadbent in The Iron Lady
  66. James Badge Dale in Shame
  67. Joaquín Cosio in A Better Life
  68. Niels Arestrup in War Horse
  69. Nick Krause in The Descendants 
  70. Goran Visnjic in Beginners 
  71. Matt Milne in War Horse 
Next Year: 1947 Supporting (I might do this year differently) 

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2011: Viggo Mortensen in A Dangerous Method

    Sunday, November 4, 2012

    Viggo Mortensen did not receive an Oscar nomination, although he did receive a golden globe nomination, for portraying Sigmund Freud in A Dangerous Method.

    A Dangerous Method is a somewhat interesting film about the relationship between the psychoanalyst Carl Jung (Michael Fassbender), and one of his female patients Sabina Spielrein (Keira Knightley). I can see why this film had such a tepid reception as the story really never becomes as compelling as it should. I would say that one thing that really holds the film back is Keira Knightley's terrible performance that unfortuantely is distractingly bad.

    Viggo Mortensen probably is not the first actor one would think of when casting the part of Sigmund Freud the founder father of psychoanalysis. Mortensen though from his first scene in the film proves that there is clearly not any miscasting. Mortensen takes on the part with a complete assurance with his portrayal of him. From his manner to his voice he creates Freud vividly. Although both his manner and voice are something very different from Mortensen usual on screen persona, they both feel entirely natural though, and only succeeding in making his depiction of Freud a compelling one.

    The scenes involving the discussions between Jung and Freud about their differences in regards to the human psyche. This is helped greatly by Mortensen's performance, and as well by the fact that Fassbender has better chemistry with Mortensen than he does with Knightley. In their first scene together as they first talk, and the differences between the two's views come out Mortensen is amazing. Mortensen as Freud absolutely controls the discussion, and Mortensen controls the scene. What is magnificent though is that Mortensen does this all so quietly, but through his calm but overpowering charisma Mortensen portrays power of Freud's personality.

    It is fantastic the way Mortensen with such ease portrays the way Freud would go unquestioned by many. What he does so well is the portrayals of the flaws of Freud. The reason why Mortensen succeeds so well in establishing the idea that Freud is very much unquestioning when it comes to his own ideas. There is no hesitations to any of his statements regarding his theories or when he takes disregarding someone else's who questions his own particularly earlier in the film. Equally effective though are the moments later on when he is taken aback by Jung's more fervent attacks of Freud's established theories, as well as even his stature within the community.

    When Freud is attacked Mortensen is great in showing that Freud barely knows what to do with such an opposition. Mortensen subtly conveys well a silent fear in Freud when he is being attacked, and really all that he does try to push forward with his charm again but Mortensen properly portrays Freud's considerable charisma that it wains greatly when he proven wrong. This is an excellent depiction of the character, and Mortensen really succeeds wonderfully with the role. I actually wish that Mortensen's Freud had his own film, or at least this film was more about just Freud and Jung as Freud is the best part of this film thanks to Mortensen.

    Unfortunately this film treats Freud a little too much as a pawn in Jung's relationship Spielrein, as Mortensen's Freud deserves much better than that. This problem is especially true towards the end of the film where Freud could use a better scene for a conclusion, but instead his last scene is more of there just for the main relationship between Jung and Spielrein. It is a shame that this occurs because Mortensen completely steals the movie, and Fassbender and Knightley (mostly because of Knightley) do not turn the central relationship into anything special. Even though Freud is misused in the film, this should not take away the fact that Mortensen absolutely meets the challenge of the character, and left me only wanting more of his depiction of Sigmund Freud.

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2011

    Thursday, November 1, 2012

    And the Nominees Were Not:

    Viggo Mortensen in A Dangerous Method

    Bryan Cranston in Drive

    Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life

    Mark Strong in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

    John Hawkes in Martha Marcy May Marlene

    231. On the Road

    Tuesday, October 2, 2012

    231. (01 Oct) On the Road (2012, Walter Salles)* 44



    Where Kerouac's writing is vibrant and rhythmic, Walter Salles' filmmaking style is the opposite. The structure is episodic and the aesthetic uninspired. Occasionally a scene is amusing or provocative, but not one offers insight or excitement. How odd that some of the most iconic characters in 20th century literature are impossible to engage with on-screen, the issue being that the leads are uniformly bland. Kirsten Dunst and Elisabeth Moss shine in supporting roles.

    Black Sheep interviews David Cronenberg & Robert Pattinson

    Wednesday, June 6, 2012

    THE COMEDY OF COSMOPOLIS
    An interview with COSMOPOLIS writer/director, David Cronenberg and star, Robert Pattinson

    When a director is as prolific as David Cronenberg is as of late, it is not uncommon to end up interviewing them more than once in the same year for different projects. I had spoken with Cronenberg earlier this year when A DANGEROUS METHOD had its Canadian release and with this week’s release of COSMOPOLIS, I found myself face to face with the icon for the second time in six months. Somehow I had completely forgotten that the man is way more amusing than I would ever expect him to be.

    “I used a little Apple program called iDirector,” Cronenberg announces of his COSMOPOLIS process. “A little green light goes on if its ok and a red light if you need another take.” See what I mean? The man is hilarious.

    There is nothing funny about the premise of COSMOPOLIS though. Based on the 2003 Don DeLillo novel of the same name, Cronenberg’s 20th feature film recounts protagonist, Eric Packer’s day long quest to get across Manhattan for a haircut from his regular barber. It sounds silly on the surface but it is set against the backdrop of the collapse of capitalism, making the film both timely and incredibly tense.

    As complex as the story is though, Cronenberg had very little trouble adapting the book into a screenplay. “I literally transcribed all the dialogue [from the novel] and put it into screenplay form. Then I looked at it and asked, ‘Is this a movie or not?’ And it was.” The entire process took him all of six days to accomplish. His extensive experience allows for this kind of efficiency. “Now that I’ve adapted a few things, I’ve accepted the rule of thumb that there are some things that you just can’t do in movies that you can easily do in novels, and vice versa. The things that didn’t work or that I couldn’t make work, I just left out.”

    Pattinson on the streets of Toronto, made to look like NYC
    One of the things that does work in the film is its star, the infamous Robert Pattinson, whom was also on hand for the COSMOPOLIS Canadian press tour. This is the first collaboration between the two super powers and already rumoured not to be the last, with Pattinson lined up for another unconfirmed Cronenberg project to be shot in France. The secret to their success? “I was in the very obvious throes of a panic attack. I guess its part of my process where I feel like I have to go through the motions of feeling like I’m having a heart attack,” Pattinson admits, wearing his anxiety like a second skin. “David got me to stop worrying. Although, he may have just been placating me until I came around.”

    Pattinson was not originally supposed to play Packer, a tycoon loathed the world over for simply being rich and good at it. The role was first given to Colin Farrell but when he dropped out due to scheduling conflicts, Cronenberg rewrote the script for a younger actor (which is more authentic to the book anyway) and immediately thought of Pattinson. The last minute casting change did not leave much time for Pattinson to prepare though.

    Cronenberg directs Pattinson
    “I was not going to come up with a completely original interpretation of DeLillo in two weeks. That’s completely ridiculous,” states Pattinson, when pressed about how he came up with the character so quickly. “There’s something about the construction in DeLillo’s writing that is so easy, you don’t need to add anything to it. That’s the direction David encouraged me in.”

    Cronenberg didn’t just encourage this loyalty to the word on the page, he insisted on it. “In general, I don’t want the actors to be screenwriters. They’re not designed for that,” Cronenberg quips, without the least bit of insult to actors at all. “If everybody is improvising and you have actors who are used to doing that with each other, that’s a whole other thing. Basically, I want them to stick to the script but within that, there are tons of things an actor can bring to it.”

    Pattinson kicking back and letting Cronenberg steal the show at the Toronto press conference.
    The remaining cast of COSMOPOLIS is made up of many familiar Canadian faces, including Jay Baruchel, Emily Hampshire, Kevin Durand and Sarah Gadon. The film was shot in and around Toronto, from Yonge and Bloor to Union Station to Geary Avenue in the wee hours of the morning. Once again, Toronto is made to look like New York City, something that COSMOPOLIS has been criticized for not doing as well as it could have. “Somebody had said to me that there aren’t even any New York landmarks in the film but there aren’t any in the book either. In fact, a lot of the places, actually almost all of them that are mentioned in the book, are gone,” Cronenberg says, in response to this criticism. “So even if we were shooting in New York, it would have looked like it did, I have to say.”

    As the capitalism capitol of the civilized world, the story had to be set in Manhattan. And with as much global unrest as there is these days, COSMOPOLIS couldn’t hit at a more opportune time. Be warned though occupiers, while the film depicts the demise of the financial world as we know it, it doesn’t do it how you would think. “There are no anti-capitalist characters in the movie, even though you might think it is an anti-capitalist creed on some level,” Cronenberg declares. “It’s really more pro-capitalist with people just wishing they were in on the action.”

    Pattinson with co-star, Paul Giamatti
    While typical fare for Cronenberg, COSMOPOLIS is not what your average Twihard (that is what they call themselves, right?) would ordinarily see. Pattinson still thinks they will like it though. “I like this script the same way I liked the TWILIGHT scripts. I’m not a post-modernist scholar,” Pattinson begins to explain but at this point, Cronenberg cuts him off.

    “Your agent said you were,” he says, dryly and without missing a beat. Suddenly everyone is laughing again and the interview is over. With chemistry like that, who knows? Maybe Pattinson will be the new Mortensen.

    Black Sheep interviews David Cronenberg

    Friday, January 6, 2012


    On paper, it would make perfect sense to any outsider that famed Canadian director, David Cronenberg, would be the only appropriate choice to direct A DANGEROUS METHOD, an exploration of the complex relationship between the great grandfathers of psychoanalysis, Carl Jung and Sigmond Freud. Melding the cerebral and the hyper-sexual in this heightened a fashion might seem like old hat for the director of DEAD RINGERS and A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, but suggest this to the man himself, and you might be surprised to hear what he has to say.

    “I have to tell you I don’t think in terms of theme at all,” Cronenberg tells me over the phone, right before my chest gets tight at the prospect of insulting one of this country’s most acclaimed talents. “Anyone telling this story would be dealing with those same things. When I’m making a movie, for me, creatively, it’s as if I’ve never made another movie.” Cronenberg is also quick to explain to me he isn’t trying to be evasive in his response. With that, my tension is relieved and we move on happily.


    “In retrospect, I could say I always wanted to do something about Freud,” Cronenberg, 68, says, upon further reflection. “To say that isn’t really to say anything at all though because Freud is such a big topic.” And so, he just needed the right project to come along and he found that project in Christopher Hampton’s (DANGEROUS LIAISONS) stage play, "The Talking Cure". Cronenberg had heard his Spider star, Ralph Fiennes, was playing Jung on the London stage and, while he couldn’t attend, he did read the play and found the angle he had been looking for all this time.


    “I thought it was very doable as a movie and it would be fascinating to approach it just the way Christopher had, which is to say very neutrally,” Cronenberg explains. Hampton’s play does not pick sides between Jung and Freud, played on film by Michael Fassbender and Viggo Mortensen, respectively, but rather allows the audience to take in their differing points of view and assess on their own where their allegiances lie. The play pits the two against each other by framing their relationship in context with another, that of a shared patient and one of the first female psychoanalysts, Sabina Spielrein, played with great fervor and bravery by Keira Knightley.


    Fleshing out the stage version for the screen was easier than one would expect. “As they were both psychoanalysts, no detail went unnoticed. They were their own first subjects after all,” Cronenberg quips. So there was a plethora of information to draw to fill out the story but there was still some things that required a certain creative flair, namely most of the intense sexuality that happens behind closed doors. “There are some very intimate moments which are speculative, of course. There was still some modesty involved in these relationships because of the era.”


    As impassioned as it gets onscreen, Cronenberg insists that the set itself, located in Vienna and in various German locations, could not have been more ideal. “It was as though, after one or two days, as if you’d worked with everybody many times before,” he recalls fondly. Of course, Cronenberg has actually worked with Mortensen before, most recently in 2007’s EASTERN PROMISES. While Christoph Waltz was originally due to play Freud, he had to drop out because of scheduling conflicts, and Mortensen stepped in. “With Viggo, I would say I have a long hand rather than a short hand,” Cronenberg describes of their working relationship. “We would exchange something like 25 e-mails about what kind of cigars Freud smoked and when.”


    Cronenberg is currently in post-production on his 20th feature, COSMOPOLIS, based on the Don DeLillo novel and starring Robert Pattinson. First up though, he must contend with awards season, as A DANGEROUS METHOD is naturally garnering attention. Though happy with the acclaim, Cronenberg takes the arduous process in stride. “Awards season isn’t a real season; it’s not like fall or winter,” says the man whose first brush with Oscar came when his 1986 film, THE FLY, took home the statue for Best Visual Effects. “It can be very exhausting if you’re nominated so at a certain moment, part of you is almost praying you don’t get any nominations.”

    Well, consider my fingers crossed for you, Mr. Cronenberg. Wait.

    495. A Dangerous Method

    Sunday, December 18, 2011

    495. (17 Dec) /A Dangerous Method/ (2011, David Cronenberg)* 75



    On this rewatch, I'm more impressed than ever by the beautiful structuring of Christopher Hampton's script. There's also such astonishing nuance in the men's performances that balance Knightley's histrionics.

    A DANGEROUS METHOD

    Friday, December 9, 2011

    A DANGEROUS METHOD
    Written by Christopher Hampton
    Directed by David Cronenberg
    Starring Michael Fassbender, Keira Knightley and Viggo Mortensen

    Otto Gross: If there is one thing I’ve learned in my short life, it’s this: Never repress anything.

    Canadian director, David Cronenberg, is synonymous with exploring sexuality and psychology on screen. In his latest epic, A DANGEROUS METHOD, he lets our minds get lost amidst these two forces as they intersect in Austria during the birth of modern psychology. What should have been an explosion of intense thought and tantalizing eroticism unfortunately amounts to little more than awkward conversation.

    Like so much of psychoanalysis, some things make perfect sense on the page but do not necessarily apply past the theory. On paper, A DANGEROUS METHOD should work. Michael Fassbender plays Carl Jung, the founder of analytical psychology, who engages in a father-son like relationship with Sigmund Freud, played by three-time Cronenberg collaborator, Viggo Mortensen. Freud’s beliefs surrounding psychological trauma tended to be sexual in nature and this would inevitably cause an irreparable rift between them as Jung thought there had to be more to it than that. The situation was only further exacerbated by Jung’s own affair with one of his own patients, Sabina Spielrein (Keira Knightley). The two enter a kinky relationship that really only proves Freud’s point but men being men, neither will admit any fault.


    A DANGEROUS METHOD is aptly performed by its talented cast and beautifully shot and composed but it never truly comes alive. Considering the film itself is about repression, it certainly feels as though it could have used some loosening up. Instead, its tightly wound setting and nature eventually lead to its own unravelling.

    472. A Dangerous Method

    Monday, November 21, 2011

    472. (20 Nov) A Dangerous Method (2011, David Cronenberg)* 73



    I'm regularly drawn to costume dramas with elements that make them feel completely contemporary, so by the time Michael Fassbender's spanking Keira Knightley in her bedroom I was bowled over. Cronenberg fearlessly confronts Carl Jung, Sigmund Freud, and Sabina Spielrein as individuals. Though all helped popularize psychology, it's fascinating to see how they ignore their own professional ethics or hide behind self-diagnosis for the sake of convenience. Only Freud comes off at all well, and his rigidness certainly doesn't make him sympathetic.

    It's a compelling narrative and it would be a mistake if Christopher Hampton's script didn't make it into this year's Oscar discussion. Kiera Knightley's explosive, selfless performance is a standout, but I appreciate seeing Viggo Mortensen and Michael Fassbender in such sublimely understated roles.

    Posters for A Dangerous Method, The Artist, and My Week with Marilyn

    Wednesday, August 24, 2011

    Three of my most eagerly-anticipated awards seasons releases have new posters.  One I adore, another I enjoy, and the final leaves something to be desired.  Either way, I'm sure we're looking at the mug of at least 5 future Oscar nominees.

    Below, David Cronenberg's A Dangerous Method, staring Keira Knightley, Viggo Mortensen, and Michael Fassbender.


    Below, Michel Hazanavicius' ode to silent films, The Artist, staring John Goodman and Jean Dujardin.


    Below, Simon Curtis' much-talked-about film about Marilyn Monroe, aptly titled My Week with Marilyn.  Staring Michelle Williams as the title character, Kenneth Branagh as Sir Laurence Olivier, and Judi Dench as Dame Sybil Thorndike.



     

    Blogger news

    Blogroll

    Most Reading