Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Arthur Kennedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arthur Kennedy. Show all posts

Bright Victory (1951)

Monday, October 15, 2012

***
Country: US
Director: Mark Robson

Several months ago I wrote about Marlon Brando's first film, The Men (1950), a picture about a paraplegic World War II veteran and the problems he faces adjusting to his disability. Just a year after that film was made, a very similar film on the same subject was made, Bright Victory, about a soldier who has been blinded in North Africa in 1943. Not having seen Bright Victory in many years, I watched it last week when it was shown on TCM as part of the channel's series on disability in film. Because the two films deal with such a similar subject and have many elements and even scenes in common, a direct comparison was inevitable. Even though I found both pictures to be good, I would have to say that in all respects The Men is the better film.

Arthur Kennedy stars as the war veteran, Larry Nevins, who is ambushed by German snipers. The two other men in his Jeep are killed, and Nevins receives serious wounds to his eyes. (One of the men in the Jeep is played by 25-year old Rock Hudson in one of the last bit parts he had at Universal before becoming a featured player and then one of the studio's biggest stars.) When Larry is first told by doctors that he is completely blind, his reaction is a bad one, and these scenes are some of the few highly emotional ones in a picture that is generally restrained about its subject. Sent to the veterans' hospital in Valley Forge, he goes through an intensive training course to help him cope with his disability. As in The Men, these scenes have a documentary feel. While at Valley Forge, Larry meets Judy Greene (Peggy Dow), a young woman who works as a volunteer at the hospital, and the two soon develop a close friendship.

After the training course Larry returns to his family in Florida, where he is engaged to a young woman, Chris Paterson (Julie Adams), whom he hasn't seen in more than two years. After films like The Best Years of Our Lives and The Men, the problems he faces in his return to civilian life have an air of familiarity. Larry has accepted his disability and is managing to cope with its challenges, but his parents and the people around him don't have such an easy time of it. His fiancée's wealthy family in particular are dismissive of his ability to rejoin the mainstream and don't hide their displeasure at the prospect of the marriage. Chris doesn't seem to share this attitude, but she is strongly under the influence of her parents, and it's not totally clear whether her feelings for Larry are more love or loyalty. At the same time, Larry yearns to do something more meaningful with his life than work for his in-laws in a job that is the result of patronage, and he is inspired by the success of a blind lawyer to consider taking up law studies. As the film proceeds, we see how Larry arrives at the decisions that will determine his future.

Chris (Julie Adams) and Larry (Arthur Kennedy)

Bright Victory has an exceptionally able cast—including James Edwards, Will Geer, Minor Watson, Richard Egan, and Jim Backus—but this is Arthur Kennedy's show all the way. A stage actor brought to the attention of Warner Bros. by James Cagney, who wanted him to play the younger brother in City for Conquest (1941), Kennedy went on to work over the next twenty years with some of the best film directors in the business. He became one of the most reliable supporting actors in Hollywood, continuing as he began with Cagney by playing second lead to stars like Bogart, Kirk Douglas, James Stewart, and Robert Mitchum, and earning four Oscar nominations for best supporting actor. Bright Victory, the second of four films Kennedy made with director Mark Robson, was one of the few times he was given a lead role, and it got him an Oscar nomination as best actor. (He lost to Humphrey Bogart in The African Queen but was named best actor by the New York Film Critics, in the view of some as an alternative to Marlon Brando's controversial performance in A Streetcar Named Desire.)

Kennedy is superb in the picture. If his performance lacks the impact of Brando's in The Men—and it does—it's not because of his acting, but because of deficiencies in the conception of the character. Brando's Bud Wilocek is isolated from the people around him by his despair, a tortured individual whose attempt to adjust to his disability is a soul-challenging struggle. Kennedy's Larry in Bright Victory might initially be devastated by the realization that he is totally blind, but in contrast to Bud in The Men, he is a resilient, confident person who quickly confronts and masters the challenges of his changed circumstances. Like Bud he has to cope with hurtful reactions to his condition by those around him, but any internal struggle he might experience is soon resolved. This removes from the situation the constant inner torment that made Brando so compelling in The Men.

Instead, the writers (the film is based on a novel by Baynard Kendrick) inject a couple of tangential subjects to intensify the element of conflict. One is racial prejudice. Early in the film, Larry, a native Floridian, unknowingly sits next to an African American soldier on the train to the hospital at Valley Forge. When he realizes the race of the man he has been chatting to in a friendly way, Larry shuns him. Later this trite situation of the blind person not recognizing race is repeated when Larry unwittingly becomes friends with a blind African American soldier in the hospital, Joe Morgan (James Edwards), then shuns him too when he discovers his race. At the end of the movie there is a pat reconciliation scene in which Larry suddenly abandons his lifelong bigotry and again becomes friends with Joe. This subplot is so compressed that it just doesn't ring true. It's an inadequate way of addressing an issue that might have seemed less of an afterthought had it been more explicitly connected to the film's theme of tolerance, with the change in Larry's attitude explained in a more psychologically convincing way. Instead it seems a contrivance intended to distinguish Bright Victory from similar films and, worse, a distraction from the film's main theme.

Another subplot that diverts attention from the main subject of the film is the well-worn love triangle. Judy, the young hospital volunteer Larry meets at Valley Forge, plainly has romantic feelings for Larry. Yet although he flirts with her, he seems oblivious to her emotions. Even after he does finally recognize the true nature of her feelings, he still chooses to return to his fiancée and his former way of life in Florida. But when he goes back briefly to Valley Forge, they meet up again, and in fact it is Judy who introduces him to the blind lawyer who causes him to rethink his plans for the future, including his engagement to Chris. The whole love-triangle subplot makes Bright Victory seem a more conventional picture than The Men. And like Larry's racial bigotry, it's a measure of a lack of confidence in the power of the subject of disability to carry the film by itself.

Bright Victory lacks not only the thematic focus of The Men, but also the more truthful tentativeness of that film's conclusion. The Men ends hopefully but uncertainly. Things might work out for Brando's Bud. But we get the idea that if they do, it won't be easily, it won't be without problems further along, and it won't be with any permanent sense of security. With its more optimistic outlook, Bright Victory leaves us feeling much more comfortable than does The Men. Despite Larry's problems, in comparison to Bud his future seems predictable and upbeat. There never seems much doubt that Larry will overcome his problems, and that's why in the end his victory over adversity seems entirely too easy.


Knockout (1941).

Monday, August 20, 2012



Knockout (1941. Directed by William Clemens. With Arthur Kennedy, Olympe Bradna, Virginia Field and Anthony Quinn.

It does not take long before sports promoter Trego, learns that he bought a phony contract for boxer Johnny Rocket. Johnny, had already made plans to quit the ring after his next fight to please his fiancée, Angela Grinnelli. When Trego, cannot change Johnny's mind, Trego makes sure that he does not find another job.

Johnny and Angela marry, and when Angela becomes pregnant, Johnny lets Trego know, that he is ready to get back into the boxing ring.

One day at the gym, sports writer Gloria Van Ness, is introduced to Johnny. Gloria, comes on to Johnny, but.. devoted to Angela, he puts a stop to her advances.

One night, while Johnny is in the ring, Angela gives birth and the baby dies. Johnny, wanting to put it out of his mind, becomes more dedicated to winning the championship.

Johnny, eventually gives into Gloria's advances and Angela leaves him. He now believes that he is unbeatable and fires Trego. The crafty, Trego gives Johnny a drugged mouthpiece and he loses his fight. Which makes it look like he threw the fight and he is suspended from boxing.

No longer interested, Gloria drops Johnny and moves to Hawaii. Now, that his career is damaged, Johnny, must change his name and move to another town.

In one of his matches he suffers a concussion and is warned that he must never fight again. When Johnny learns that Angela paid his hospital bills, he goes to see her, but Angela's father sends him away. Not knowing what else to do, Johnny enters another match. When Angela hears about it over the radio, she rushes to the ring to stop him, but will it be too late?

I thought the classic film Knockout, was an above average 'B' film that is at its best when Johnny gets in over his head hanging out with a "fast crowd".

Olympe Bradna (born 12 August 1919, Paris, France) was a French dancer and actress. At eighteen months of age she appeared with her mother and father who were world-famous bare back riders. At the age of eight she made a hit with acrobatic dancing in a French version of Hit the Deck.

When old enough she joined the Folies Bergère. She danced in Stockholm, New York and many other capitals. She later went into films.

Filmography International Squadron (1941), Highway West (1941), Knockout (1941), South of Pago Pago (1940), The Night of Nights (1939), Say It in French (1938), Stolen Heaven (1938), Souls at Sea (1937), High, Wide, and Handsome (1937), The Last Train from Madrid (1937), College Holiday (1936), Three Cheers for Love (1936), Flofloche (1934) and Roger la Honte (1933).


Best Supporting Actor 1958: Results

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

5. Arthur Kennedy in Some Came Running- Kennedy gives a rather uninteresting performance in a very dispensable part.
4. Theodore Bikel in The Defiant Ones- Bikel gives an adequate performance that fulfills his role as the humane sheriff.
3. Gig Young in Teacher's Pet- Gig Young gives a rather enjoyable performance being funny both when he is the perfect pompous man, to just a man with a very bad hangover.
2. Lee J. Cobb in The Brothers Karamazov- Although he is not in a great film Cobb makes the most out of his performance. He turns his bad father into an effectively realistic villain who is just as much of a buffoon as he is a master manipulator.
1. Burl Ives in The Big Country- Good prediction Eddie and Fritz. Ives gives the best performance of all of the nominees despite the fact that his film is quite lacking on a whole. Ives though never becomes the mediocrity of his surroundings though and gives a powerful moving portrait of troubled landowner and father, that frankly finds complexities to the part that probably were not even in the character as written.
Deserving Performances:
Orson Welles in Touch of Evil
Burl Ives in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof

Best Supporting Actor 1958: Arthur Kennedy in Some Came Running

Friday, March 2, 2012

Arthur Kennedy received his fifth and final Oscar nomination for portraying Frank Hirsh in Some Came Running.

Some Came Running depicts the problems faced by a returning war veteran Dave Hirsh (Frank Sinatra).

After watching all of Kennedy's supporting nominations I must say he is not in the league of Claude Rains, and in fact most of his nominations are pretty standard supporting performance that have absolutely no real distinction to them. This is probably the most true about his performance here though as Frank Sinatra's character's brother. The brother who tries his best to defend his brother, and tries to talk to him but has very little success either way. His whole character does feel a bit dispensable, particularly when the film attempts to give him a sub plot involving affair with his secretary caused by the coldness of his wife.

His character is rather repetitive and by the end of the film one could care less about him. Kennedy's follows suit with his performance which is equally repetitive. His performance is basically a one note of awkwardness around his defense of his character's brother. There is not any special connection ever shown between him and Sinatra in fact the way they were together you'd think they weren't brothers at all. After all there should be some small history between the two even if a small one, but the way the two interact suggests absolutely nothing. It does not even suggest estrangement even, since Kennedy plays his part in such a superficial fashion throughout his performance.

It just a terribly uninteresting performance for a terribly uninteresting character. Even when he has his affair, which the film barely cares about, Kennedy still does not make anything out of Frank. He still stays on the same basic note, and the affair just feels like something written for him to do rather than passionate action by Frank. I suppose the fact that Frank is boring does have a great deal in the way the part is written, really Kennedy has very little to work with to be perfectly honest, but still there was probably something more one could have done with the part than Kennedy does. This is not to say that Kennedy truly awful in the part, but at the same time it is a very dull performance from an actor seemed better suited for lead roles, at least when it comes to his Oscar nomination performances.

Best Supporting Actor 1958

Thursday, March 1, 2012

And the Nominees Were:

Theodore Bikel in The Defiant Ones

Lee J. Cobb in The Brothers Karamazov

Burl Ives in The Big Country

Gig Young in Teacher's Pet

Arthur Kennedy in Some Came Running

Best Supporting Actor 1955: Results

Thursday, December 1, 2011

5. Joe Mantell in Marty- There is nothing wrong with Mantell's performance, but there just is not much to it either.
4. Arthur O'Connell in Picnic- O'Connell most certainly has a certain charm to his performance, and does not fall into the melodramatic overacting of some of his co-stars, but on a whole he still does not do anythign substantial.
3. Arthur Kennedy in Trial- Kennedy spends a little too much effort to be noticed in this film but having said that he still does give an effective performance.
2. Sal Mineo in Rebel Without a Cause- Mineo gives a very strong quiet performance, that conveys the troubles of his character without fault.
1. Jack Lemmon in Mr. Roberts- Good Predictions Eddie, and Moviefilm. Lemmon is my choice of the year with his very entertaining and enjoyable performance. It is very easy to do comedy like this poorly, but Lemmon hits all the right notes, as well manages to bring the more dramatic aspects of his performance to life as well as the comedic ones.

Best Supporting Actor 1955: Arthur Kennedy in Trial

Arthur Kennedy received his third Oscar nomination for portraying Barney Castle in Trial.

Trial depicts the trial of a young Mexican boy accused of murder.

The more I see of Arthur Kennedy the more I must say I do not find him to be one of the best character actors, not a bad one, but not one who makes a film better by simply being in it. In fact I still feel the strongest performance of his was his leading turn in Bright Victory, and really I think he would have probably been better as a leading man on a whole. Here Arthur Kennedy plays a lawyer who takes the case of the young boy, but he may have other reasons for taking the case than just to help the kid.

Arthur Kennedy here shows his shortcomings in this performance as well as his strengths. In his scenes he tends to try a little hard to be noticed in his scenes. He always attempts to dominate his scenes, and be noticed even though he is not the star. Kennedy does not go over the top really, but there is more of a visible effort shown that really should be. That being said Kennedy does not fail or fall on his face either though.

Kennedy as Barney still has a strength and certain command that makes for Barney who does want to make a splash, and make the case be noticed. Kennedy does show there is most certainly an intelligence to Barney in the way he handles the case, there quickness in Kennedy's performance that perfectly expresses the knowledge Barney has of the case, and exactly how he can use it for its own cause.

Barney is not at all the noble crusading lawyer he pretends to be and only wishes to use the case of the young boy for his hidden agenda. Here Kennedy shows that Barney does always seem to have more than one thing on his mind at a time, suggesting his hidden motives, although I think Kennedy could have handled it better still since he goes just a little far with Barney's almost brutal way of handling his client that when it is revealed he has been hiding something all along you see it coming more than you should. Kennedy though on a whole does give a good performance, I only wish it had been just a little more refined than it may have been a great performance.

Best Supporting Actor 1955

Saturday, November 26, 2011

And the Nominees Were:

Sal Mineo in Rebel Without a Cause

Joe Mantell in Marty

Jack Lemmon in Mister Roberts

Arthur O'Connell in Picnic

Arthur Kennedy in Trial
 

Blogger news

Blogroll

Most Reading