Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Diane Keaton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Diane Keaton. Show all posts

Annie Hall

Friday, February 17, 2012

Annie Hall, 1977
Directed by Woody Allen
Up Against: The Goodbye Girl, Julia, The Turning Point, Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope

Woody Allen directs and stars in this film. While it's only the second Woody Allen film I've seen (the first being Midnight in Paris- yes I'm behind on things), it's the first film I've seen him act in.

Allen plays a wonderfully dorky, intelluctual, neurotic comedian, living in New York City. He's been married twice already, and opens up the film telling us that life is full of loneliness and it's over too quickly, and that he'd never be a part of a club that has a member like himself. Right off the bat we get an idea about who Alvy Singer is and what he's about. He's not like most guys.

Alvy is in love with a woman named Annie Hall. She's slightly ditsy, and a different kind of neurotic. She's flighty and simple-minded, while Alvy is a deep-thinker who's always pinned as being slightly hostile, obsessed with death and paranoid. The story of their love is told in a narrative that jumps back and forth between present and past, and is riddled with captions stating what they're thinking, their present selves visiting their past selves, and frequently addressing the audience with their thoughts. It's a quirky love story, but it's utterly charming.

The film tells us about how Alvy and Annie were introduced (playing tennis), how they got together, the good times, the bad times, the break-ups, the other one-night stands and the getting back together. And the circle continues. While the story doesn't have too much of a plot, it's interesting. It's more of a documentary of 2 lovers in New York, living life.

In a way this film reminded me of (500) Days of Summer. Not so much what the film was about, but more how they were both told in quirky, unique ways, and focused on how different they both were (Tom and Summer, and Alvy and Annie). Had this film been told how regular movies are told, with little voice-over narrative, few flashbacks and a definitie plot, this film would've been a lot less charming than it was. Alvy is cooky but you feel for him, and you love his quirks. Annie is erratic, but you come to love and care about her too.

I loved Woody Allen playing Alvy. Yes I know he wrote the screenplay, but I thought he was perfectly dorky, and carried the part so well. He really understand Alvy (duh), but really portrayed him well too, with great timing and perfect awkwardness. Diane Keaton was also great as Annie. She was the perfect balance between being erratic and simple-minded. She brought passion into the part, and played Annie well. Hence her winning the Oscar for the role.

Of course, the screenplay was great. Woody Allen seems strongest suit really seems to be writing. Many times I wished he'd write novels, while watching this movie. They would be incredibly interesting.

The only few flaws of the film was many-a-times, a flashback scene would be shown, and I'm never really sure if it's ended, or if we're back in the present. It's easy when we're seeing flashbacks of Alvy and his ex-wives, but his flashbacks with Annie are less defined, and the scene at the beginning of the movie, I'm never sure if after that we went completely to the beginning and went chronologically, or if we came back to that point and did present time then flashbacks, alternating.

But overall, I really enjoyed the film. It's so different from other Best Picture's I've watched so far. It was a cute movie, it was funny and sarcastic, and it was enjoyable to watch!

8/10

The Final Conclusion - Best Actress 2003

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

2003


So the much anticipated ranking is:

This is a wasted opportunity.2003 offered some really weak Best Actress nominees and Morton was one of them. There were some points where I was minimally impressed but for most of the time I felt really nothing. Too bad, as this could have been something very interesting and moving and yet it became a little dreary and lifeless.

I'm very confused. How should I feel? What should I be thinking? For me, Naomi Watts' performance in 21 Grams is a failure. It's not epic fail, it's more of a missed opportunity even though it's extremely hard to say anything about this performance and the movie. All so shady and confusing and again, not in a good way.

Keisha Castle-Hughes, stands out in the awful field of 2003. Although this is not one of the greatest performances, she still turned in a beautiful work, full of substance. The great parts make up for the weaknesses and overall it's a really great job by an extremely young talent.

I ask myself: is this that much from Diane Keaton? Well, probably not. Still, she's extremely funny and entertaining as Erica Barry, she has a wonderful chemistry with Jack Nicholson and she enlightens the screen with her wonderful, radiant personality that I love so much. I might be biased but who cares? I liked her.

SURPIRSE! :) This performance is universally praised and for a reason. Charlize Theron gives an unfogettable, astonishing, breathtaking, mindblowing, heart-breaking, angry, bitter, desperate, devastated, devastating, in short brilliant performance as Aileen Wuornos. This might look like another deglam role but it's more than that in my opinion. Charlize really rocks as Aileen, showing the dark sides of human life. Brilliant.

So I can proudly announce
the winner is...
Charlize Theron
in
Monster
As easily as it gets.

Congratulations to Malcolm! Excellent predictions! Prize: you can pick the year I'm going to do after the next one (available for me: 1933, 1943, 1953, 1956, 1961, 1962, 1967, 1968, 1971 1976, 1982, 1985, 1988, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1999, 2000, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008)

Final thoughts: An awful year. There you go, I said it. I guess that's pretty much what I expected. Charlize was the easiest winner so far. There was so much gap between the first and the second that it almost hurts. Diane and Keisha are pretty solid. However, the other two ladies were not that satisfying (ot put it delicately). Actually, this was the first year when two nominees were fighting for the #4 spot. :) I gave the edge to Naomi because she grew on me a bit.


Omissions: 

  • Uma Thurman in Kill Bill Vol. 1. 
  • Jamie Lee Curtis in Freaky Friday



The ranking of the reviewed years:

  1. 1944
  2. 1969
  3. 1974
  4. 1989
  5. 2001
  6. 1959
  7. 2006
  8. 1978
  9. 2010
  10. 1996
  11. 1964
  12. 1939
  13. 1977
  14. 1997
  15. 2009
  16. 1980
  17. 1941
  18. 1972
  19. 1963
  20. 1966
  21. 1973
  22. 1983
  23. 1986
  24. 1937
  25. 1990
  26. 1954
  27. 1958
  28. 1948
  29. 2002
  30. 1957
  31. 2003
  32. 1940
  33. 1998
  34. 1975
About the next year: Oh, I can't wait to do the next year. It offers not one, but two (or even three?) iconic performances. I really want to make my thoughts clear on that year. It's a historic year. This clue says why:
  • VIVA ITALIA! :)
What do you think?

Diane Keaton in Something's Gotta Give

Monday, July 11, 2011

Diane Keaton received her fourth Best Actress nomination for playing Erica Barry, a divorced, rich playwright in Something's Gotta Give. I think if it hadn't been for Charlize Theron, Diane Keaton would have won her second Oscar in that so-so year. She won the Golden Globe (actually, she was the only nominee besides Theron who was nominated for the Golden Globe), this was sort of a comeback (and also a movie that brought many movies for her that are all total disasters) plus she's Diane Keaton, who's nominated every decade. I wonder if she'll get a nomination this decade, too.

Something's Gotta Give is a movie that really doesn't fit my taste. Just like with It's Complicated I feel a bit awkward looking at these divorced people who are rich as hell and don't have any real problems just some issues in their love lives. That being said, I still had some fun while watching it, despite the fact that it's totally predictable. I think Jack Nicholson is very good in his role but I don't feel that it was much of a strech for him. The others gave pretty forgettable performances.

OK, let's start it here: I really love Diane Keaton. Her performance as Annie Hall is beyond words for me and I'm so in love with her roles in the 70s and the 80s. One can say that she's playing Annie Hall over and over again but I wouldn't say so. I think she's much more versatile than people actually think. She could play a totally iconic character, she could light up one of the most boring movies of all time (Reds) with her performance as the radical feminist, she could be a lonely, forgotten spinster in Crimes of the Heart or a leukemia patient in Marvin's Room. I think she's pretty great despite the horrible choices she's made in her career recently. I still hope for a really, truly great role for her.

Because to tell the truth, the part of Erica Barry is not that great. Seriously, she's a typical middle-aged rom-com heroine who hasn't had sex since the Mesozoic Era. She really doesn't have much depth but she's the one you can laugh at. I guess Diane Keaton really was the best choice to play her. She's like an older, updated version of Annie Hall without that special sparkling that was present in Woody Allen's classic.

There are many people who really love this performance. Although I'm not one of them, I still really liked Diane in this movie as she managed to be very entertaining plus she delivered the best performance of the actors. I had fun while looking at her, while I saw her laughing, crying and so on. The first scene of Erica is a typical Diane Keaton moment with the loud, over-the-top scream and exaggerated mannerisms. And they all work or at least for me. A memorable entrance is always a positive thing in my book. I guess that influenced my way of looking at this performance. If I instantly like something, it's hard for me to dislike it after a while.

Keaton's chemistry with Jack Nicholson is the most crucial element of the whole movie. If it had not been there, everything would have failed. Fortunately, it's really present and they make up a really great couple (that's probably why they are still my favorite Best Picture presenters of the past). I don't know there's something both simple and extraordinary about them that I really cannot explain. They just seem to be great together.

There's something that Diane Keaton managed to do here that Meryl Streep failed to do in It's Complicated. Keaton was able to avoid making a total fool of herself even though that naked scene was on the edge. It wasn't even that funny but still it could have been way more awkward. Somehow, she was able to keep the balance between funny and idiot. Just like the crying scene. She's so over-the-top and yet I laughed my butt off as she was just hilarious. I guess it would be much for some but not for me. Somehow I have a thing for exaggerated cries in a comedies. Looking at Diane is like watching Doris Day in Pillow Talk sometimes and that's also probably why I loved her so much sometimes.

As I said, the movie is totally predictable and yet Diane's performance elevates it somehow. She gives it what it needed: spirit. She fills it with her luminous, wonderful presence and made it a really funny, lovely experience.

I ask myself, though: is this that much from Diane Keaton? Well, probably not. Still, she's extremely funny and entertaining as Erica Barry, she has a wonderful chemistry with Jack Nicholson and she enlightens the screen with her wonderful, radiant personality that I love so much. I might be biased but who cares? I liked her.

A true, strong 4.

What do you think?

The Next Year

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

2003


So the nominees were:
  • Keisha Castle-Hughes in Whale Rider
  • Diane Keaton in Something's Gotta Give
  • Samantha Morton in In America
  • Charlize Theron in Monster
  • Naomi Watts in 21 Grams
I surrender. Let's see this year. :)

What do you think? Who's your pick? What are your predictions?

The Final Conclusion - Best Actress 1996

Monday, June 6, 2011

1996


So the much anticipated ranking is:

I have really mixed feelings about Kristin Scott Thomas in The English Patient. I loved the beginning and the way she showed Katharine's behaviour but from the middle, this performance becomes painfully insignificant. Yes, it's 100% the movie's fault and yet the performance suffers from it unfortunately. Too bad as Kristin had the potential of becoming fantastic here.

Diane Keaton is quite proper in a mediocre movie and she really stands out. But here comes the question: is this really a great achievement? It's really good and I don't have any bad feelings about her and yet I feel a bit too indifferent about her. Yeah, there are many touching scenes but I was never very amazed by her. Still, it's Diane and she gives the best performance of the movie.

It's really an OMG that she's only third with this achievement but the performances of the Top 3 are all so fantastic and I have to rank them somehow. Frances McDormand is a real moral compass in Fargo and she gives a beautiful, wonderful performance that is a shining light in the darkness of Fargo. An absolutely astonishing work by a wonderful character actress. I wish I could give out a three way tie.

It causes me physical pain not to pick Brenda but between her and Emily, my pick is obvious, no matter how much I love Brenda's amazing, brilliant, wonderful performance as Cynthia Rose Purley. Yes, that telephone scene itself should have landed the Oscar in her hands and yes, the improvisative skills of Brenda are brilliant but I just can't make her my pick over Emily. I'm really sad.

A spiritual revelation. Emily Watson gives one of the best performances of all time as Bess McNeill. She's so painful, so true and so brilliant as Bess, showing her feelings so incredibly. The purity, the clarity, all the wonders in this role all justify the amount of love that Emily receives from everyone who watches the movie. This is really something for the ages and I'm grateful I could experience such brilliance.

So I can proudly announce
that my winner is...
Emily Watson
in
Breaking the Waves
Easy win.

Final thoughts: Oh my GOOOOD (in a very Janice way)! Three such brilliant performances that they would have made very worthy winners in any year. The thing is that both Frances and Brenda are extremely worthy of an Oscar and it's splendid that Frances won but still... it was Emily's Oscar without any contest. It's such a haunting, harrowing and wonderful performance for the ages. Brilliant, no other good word for her. And truth to be told, I really wanted to resist her. However, this is a strangely bipolar year as Diane and Kristin (two actresses I love more than the others generally) didn't give their best performances despite being very good, occasionally. Making Kristin #5 must be quite surprising but I felt it was Diane who grew on me the most. And at last I finished this year. It took a long-long time, I know but I was very-very busy in the past month. I can't wait to get to more years in the summer.

The ranking of the reviewed years:
  1. 1944
  2. 1969
  3. 1974
  4. 1989
  5. 1959
  6. 2006
  7. 1996
  8. 1964
  9. 1939
  10. 1977
  11. 2010
  12. 1997
  13. 2009
  14. 1980
  15. 1941
  16. 1972
  17. 1963
  18. 1966
  19. 1973
  20. 1983
  21. 1990
  22. 1978
  23. 1954
  24. 1948
  25. 2002
  26. 1957
  27. 1940
  28. 1998
About the next year: Finally, a year from a very ignored decade of mine (I can't do anything about it as the movies are so hard to find) . But I'm SOOOOO looking forward to it. There will be romance, comedy, drama, peasants, mothers, courtesans, soon-to-be ex-wives and a real star will be born, I think. OK, it's incredibly easy to find out but I'm very-very excited about it. :)

Diane Keaton in Marvin's Room

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Diane Keaton received her third Best Actress nomination for playing Bessie, a sick woman who is attempting to end a long feud with her sister in order to get her bone marrow in the movie Marvin's Room. I really think that Diane was fifth as she was the only previous winner, she didn't star in a huge and/or groundbreaking movie like the other nominees. And to tell the truth, this is not the kind of role or more accurately performance that wins the Oscar (or is it?).

Marvin's Room is a very average movie, in my opinion. It's a movie that's typically shown on a certain Hungarian Tv channel on Friday, at noon. It's soappy, quite humorless (or more appropriately said, it has really unfunny humor) and the screenplay is so mediocre. And so are the performances, the direction and everything possibble. However, Rachel Portman's quite (a bit) soappy score fits the movie extremely well and that's the only really positive technical aspect of Marvin's Room.

Diane Keaton is an actress I really love. She has a brilliant, really radiant screen presence that shines through even the weakest material. Yes, I really worship and admire her and yet I can be very-very critical of her and I'm extremely furious that she takes these awful parts nowadays. She's really degrading herself and I'm really-really hoping that the right screenplay will come to her very soon and she brings back something that was lost after Something's Gotta Give.

As I said, she has a very charming and wonderful presence that makes all of her performances sort of special. Even in a very boring movie like Reds, she's able to be fantastic and memorable. For instance, she's one of the main reasons why the remakes of Father of the Bride are simply wonderful. Marvin's Room is (once again) a lame, mediocre movie with excellent actors (yes, this was sort of true about most of the movies of the 90s) and I was really hoping to see Diane elevate the material. Interesting enough, she did but not as much as I really hoped for.

Marvin's Room is the movie for which Meryl Streep was NOT nominated and therefore the comparisions between the two ladies are inevitable. Unfortunately, if I may say so. To tell the truth, Meryl gives a horribly calculated and overacted performance and I really didn't buy her acting. It's one of the worst examples of 90s Meryl acting that I'm not particularly fond of. Sure, she has the moments but those are thanks to her great co-operation of Diane Keaton.

Diane Keaton (as I said) has very average material to work with and in a way her acting is also a bit average but for me she was the shining light in this mess of a movie. The story uses some cheap tricks to get the audience's sympathy but somehow Diane successfully turned away from these easy ways and chose some more complex ways to give this performance. On the one hand, it was quite good and she was better than her movie. On the other hand, I felt that her acting was a musical piece that's a bit out of tune.

Diane Keaton has the "cancer-storyline" so she's the one in this movie to feel sorry for. Indeed, it's quite heart-breaking to see her in some of the scenes. For instance, the one where she's crying that she doesn't dare to sleep because she's afraid of not getting up or the one in Disneyland where she faints. Those moments are quite moving and I think it's only Diane who brings some real humanity to this movie. Those are also obvious in Bessie's scenes with her nephew, their crazy driving at the beach (wow, cancer and crazy driving, I've seen it somewhere else, tell me where (; ) .

All in all, Diane Keaton is quite proper in a mediocre movie and she really stands out. But here comes the question: is this really a great achievement? It's really good and I don't have any bad feelings about her and yet I feel a bit too indifferent about her. Yeah, there are many touching scenes but I was never as amazed by her as some of the commenters of the movie's Youtube version. Still, it's Diane and she gives the best performance of the movie.

I wanted to go for 4 but I'm trying to be less lenient. I might change this to a 4 but not now.

What do you think?

The Next Year

Sunday, May 15, 2011

1996


So the nominees were:
  • Brenda Blethyn in Secrets and Lies
  • Diane Keaton in Marvin's Room
  • Frances McDormand in Fargo
  • Kristin Scott Thomas in The English Patient
  • Emily Watson in Breaking the Waves
Doing this year was a spontaneous decision but it was requested once and I feel like doing it, so let's see whom I'll pick.

What do you think? What are your predictions for my ranking? Who's your pick? What's your ranking?

Note: I will only start reviewing next weekend.

The Final Conclusion - Best Actress 1977

Sunday, February 20, 2011

1977


The much anticipated ranking:

On the one hand, Shirley MacLaine's presence is not strong enough, doesn't fight against the weakness of the screenplay and she doesn't give the work of a lifetime. On the other hand, she has some very strong and well-acted scenes, which may not make up for the rest completely.

Anne still gives the best performance of her movie, adding real depth to the character of Emma. Although she doesn't have much screentime and that catfight scene was just not for her, I still appreciated this performance and I was certainly very impressed by Anne Bancroft.

Marsha Mason may be neither amazing nor groundbreaking in The Goodbye Girl. She may not have huge dramatic moments or huge breakdown or even hysterical comedy, she gives one hell of a performance, which is entertaining, moving, lovely and so damn natural.

People don't rave about this performance as much as they do about, say, Klute and They Shoot Horses... even though they should. It's one of the most beautiful and heartbreaking peformances every by this beautiful (who's never been more beautiful than here), superbly talented actress.

Some consider Diane Keaton's win for Annie Hall a love letter to Diane herself, the character and the movie and they think that the Best Actress Oscar win wasn't about the actual performance. While I agree with the first part, I still have to add something: her win and my review is indeed a love letter to Annie Hall (the character and the movie) and Diane Keaton's brilliant, hilarious, radiant, beautiful, heartbreaking, luminous, fantastic and unforgettable performance.

So I can proudly announce
that my winner is...
Diane Keaton
in
Annie Hall
La-di-da-la-di-da; la-la

Final thoughts: A great year. I did it probably because I wanted to write the 100th review about an iconic performance (Diane that is). I mean, this is not a legendary year but it's indeed special and I'm happy that I covered it. The ranking was the easiest one I've ever had to do and I don't think it's surprising at all (I knew it already before I started). The overall standard of the movies was rather high. Although I hated The Turning Point for the first time, I enjoyed it now. Same goes for the performances: I enjoyed all of them, some more and some less. Shirley was the weakest link though she wasn't bad. Anne was quite good, Marsha was great, Jane was fantastic and Diane is... All things considered, this year was lovely.

And the winner of the predicting contest is Louis Morgan. Congratulations! :-)

Omissions: Wow, I haven't seen Gena Rowlands in Opening Night, but she's said to be amazing. I should check that performance out. Also, Diane Keaton in Looking for Mr. Goodbar must be also great. Hmm, both sound interesting. But there's an unbelievable, unbeatable performance in a Hungarian movie given by one of my favorite actesses and that's Erzsi Pásztor in The Devil Beats His Wife. AMAZING. 


The ranking of the already reviewed years:
  1. 1969
  2. 1974
  3. 1989
  4. 1959
  5. 1939
  6. 1977
  7. 2010
  8. 2009
  9. 1980
  10. 1941
  11. 1963
  12. 1966
  13. 1973
  14. 1990
  15. 1978
  16. 1954
  17. 1948
  18. 2002
  19. 1940
  20. 1998
About the next year: I wanted to do 1964, but there's no The Pumpkin Eater, damn. However, it seems that I might get it (the chances are getting higher and higher, so keep your fingers crossed), so if I have it, I'll do it instead of this mysterious next year (I'll announce the next year when I'm sure and next weekend is gonna be about this year, so I have still some time to get The Pumpkin Eater). The other year came quite suddenly to me but it seems to be interesting. There's only one clue with the next year but a help: The main principle is simplicity.
  • Friends forever
What do you think?

P.S.: Could anyone help me with getting Wild is the Wind, The Rainmaker or Some Came Running (any link is fine)? It's a shame but I can only do one year from the 50s (1950) and I promised myself to leave that one last.

Diane Keaton in Annie Hall

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Just as a start, I'd just like to say that it's an honour to write my 100th review about a really iconic performance. So the 100th reviewed work is...

Diane Keaton received her first Best Actress nomination and only Oscar to date for playing Annie Hall, the love interest of a neurotic comedian in Woody Allen's classic, Best Picture winner movie, the fabulous Annie Hall. I think that Diane Keaton's win in 1977 was pretty much what we call nowadays a lock. She had the support of the critics, the audience loved her and the movie, she won the Globe, she gave two acclaimed performances in 1977, she was the star of The Godfather movies. In short, 1977 was Diane Keaton's year, like with Kate Winslet in 2008 and yes, Sandra Bullock in 2009.

What can I say about it Annie Hall? Maybe that it's my favorite movie of all time or that it made both Woody Allen and Diane Keaton icons. Or that it's full of brilliant lines, it has a fascinating story, brilliant directing and great acting. It received five nominations and I don't think that it had a sure Best Picture win. I'm glad it won, though. Sometimes the Academy can get it really right. And they made one of their best decisions here. Woody Allen gives an excellent performance that might be annoying but I think that was the point.

Diane Keaton as an actress is such an interesting case. On the one hand, she's superbly talented and she's always such a radiant, luminous presence on the screen. I just couldn't imagine Father of the Bride without her smile (OK, so what? I love that movie) and eyes. I mean there's a scene there when she goes down the stairs on the wedding day of her daughter. Steve Martin says that she's just as beautiful as she was when he met her. And I totally believe that she's the most beautiful person for him. Sweet Diane has this luminous, unique personality which shines through the most shallow scripts. On the other hand, we have her later works and awful choices but she's still able to put on a great performance once in a while. I'm feeling towards Natalie Portman feels about her. She can do anything as she's the best.

Who can deny that Annie Hall is Diane Keaton (she's indeed Annie Hall)? However, an interesting thought came to this time: isn't it that we just identify this character with her because she just totally became Annie Hall. I've already written about this in my review about Ingrid Bergman in Autumn Sonata. The actress inhabits the role so much that it becomes her after all and one just cannot decide which part is the actress and which part is the character. This kind of brilliance is so dazzling and it gives a certain kind of mystery to the role.

As I'm writing this review, I'm just trying to really consider my words. I want every word and sentence to become perfect (which is impossible) and I just don't want to sound phony. Not for a second. I don't want to be the guy in the line at the cinema. I don't want to use these huge and very noble words because Diane's performance is just so damn natural and it lacks every phoniness. It's just so full of almost ridiculous honesty. This performance is just like a masterfully composed concerto. There's no false note in it and some little touches are so evocative in it. I love that whenever I look at Annie/Diane, something good comes to my mind and I just really forget everything that bothers me. It can be anything, Annie Hall and Diane stands there firmly and she's there to catch me when I want to jump and she does so with her loveliness, charm and optimism. Like me, like all of us, Annie has her ups and downs and Keaton does so very well at showing all the changes of this fascinating, beautiful character made of pure love. As she is made of love. Woody Allen wrote Annie with love, Diane played her with love. I feel that Diane certainly enjoyed the part of Annie and it's so wonderful to see someone so cool and confident on screen. Diane is NEVER a phony for one simple reason: she cares about Annie, she loves Annie enough to avoid the traps. Because Annie deserves it.

I don't know if there's anyone in this world who can resist her when she sings la-di-da. I mean, the whole beginning of her performance is so ditzy and crazy and every once in a while we all love being a little crazy. And anyone who's not cracked up by the driving of Annie is a totally humorless human being. Diane's comic delivery is just golden here. OH MY GOD! THERE'S A PARKING PLACE! And you just hear the breaks. It's so impossible not to fall in love with Diane here. Diane made the impossible happen: we are amazed by her because we don't become her. Instead, we become Alvy Singer and we fall in love with Annie along with Alvy over and over again, every time we watch her. And after that it's just impossible not to love her. Wheter she says that we are what Grammy Hall would call a real Jew or when she's laughing at the death of her uncle. Who the hell cares? Who cares if she's singing and no one else is listening to her? We actually DO listen to her. I might add that Diane's singing is simply the best: I mean she's no Édith Piaf, but still. It's just her.

And there comes the best delivered line ever on the silver screen. "There's a spider in the bathroom. There's a big, black spider in the bathroom." Diane was able to deliver the most inappropriate and crazy sentece about chocolate milk fit so properly as if it was the most important piece of news. Nothing (and by nothing, I really mean NOTHING) forced comes out of Diane's mouth. Although it's true that she works with the best screenplay ever written, she still nails every nuance in it. Everything is just dead on.
Diane developed the character of Annie so perfectly (I think it should be taught in acting classes. Or it is probably). Annie becomes a free-thinking, independant woman from a naive, free-spirited, ditzy Chippewa Falls girl. Annie becomes educated and she simply outgrows Alvy. Diane shows the most heartbreaking and dramatic aspect of this character so thrillingly that it almost gives me tears: Annie loves Alvy but she simply doesn't need him anymore. I think that many people do not give enough credit to that Los Angeles scene with her. She's criticised that she isn't great as a Californian girl. But damn it, she doesn't have to be a Californian girl and she really feels like a fish out of water. Diane is so heartbreaking there: somehow I always felt that she wanted to go to New York (later she moves back to New York). Or I just really cared about the character. That's possible. However I still stand firmly by the opinion that Diane's performance is not only that funny, luminous acting you experience for the first time. There's a certain bitterness to it, which I haven't recognised before but having scene the movie at least fifteen times, I still have a lot to explore in Annie as Diane Keaton added millions of layers to her. She's just so complicated.

Some consider Diane Keaton's win for Annie Hall a love letter to Diane herself, the character and the movie and they think that the Best Actress Oscar win wasn't about the actual performance. While I agree with the first part, I still have to add something: her win and my review is indeed a love letter to Annie Hall (the character and the movie) and Diane Keaton's brilliant, hilarious, radiant, beautiful, heartbreaking, luminous, fantastic and unforgettable performance.

A rating would be so pathetic in the end. I don't want to do it this time. This experience was nothing that I can measure with my Meryls.


I've done it! 100 reviews!


But still. Just to ruin everything, down here as my mistake:

The Next Year

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

1977


The nominees were:
  • Anne Bancroft in The Turning Point
  • Jane Fonda in Julia
  • Diane Keaton in Annie Hall
  • Shirley MacLaine in The Turning Point
  • Marsha Mason in The Goodbye Girl
I figured it would be nice to take a break from this year's Oscar talk and take a look at a field with these great actresses. What do you think? What are your predictions?

And why am I doing this year? Scroll down to the ranking for the answer. :-)

MORNING GLORY

Friday, November 12, 2010

Written by Aline Brosh McKenna
Directed by Roger Michell
Starring Rachel McAdams, Diane Keaton, Patrick Wilson and Harrison Ford

Mike Pomeroy: Half the people who watch your show lost the remote. The other half is just waiting for their nurse to turn them over.

In MORNING GLORY, the darling Rachel McAdams plays Becky. We all know Becky. We don’t necessarily know her in real life because I’m not convinced she actually exists anywhere other than in Hollywood films. Becky is married to her job as the executive producer of fourth place network morning show, “Daybreak”. As queen worker bee, she has no time for a life, let alone any time for love. We all know from the moment we meet her that she will inevitably find the balance in her life to live happily ever after, simultaneously providing a ripple effect of equilibrium to the people that surround her. In real life, Becky works around the clock, has meaningless sex if she’s lucky, and probably has to take a multitude of medications to keep up the pace necessary to maintain her “life”. That would be way too depressing for a romantic comedy though.

MORNING GLORY may not be grounded in anything other than a clichéd perspective on life, but director, Roger Michell (NOTTING HILL) still manages to pull enough genuine emotion from his cast to make the experience pretty pleasant and often pretty funny. McAdams is the center, a 28-year-old who must choose between her dreams and reality (28 is apparently the cut off age for chasing dreams). Her effortless charm propels her through countless difficult situations but you can tell she can feel the sting of failure catching up behind her and pushing her forward at the same time. Her morning show anchors are played by legends, Diane Keaton and Harrison Ford. Keaton is sadly underused but looks to be having a blast whenever on screen. As for Ford, it was refreshing to see him look like he’s trying for a change. As former trusted news anchor and current unemployed curmudgeon, Mike Pomeroy, Ford’s cold exterior and antagonizing delivery could not be better suited. By the time he has to show a little heart (c’mon, you knew he would!), it practically feels like it could change the world.


I would like someone to answer this question for me. When is Patrick Wilson going to just waltz into my empty elevator on one of the worst days of my life like he does for Becky on hers? I would settle for someone who isn’t Wilson but is as equally attractive. The truth is though that, while life doesn’t work this way necessarily, people do still find happiness by searching, hoping and never giving up. It’s just a lot easier for them to find it when there is a director behind a camera making sure that all the missing pieces are waiting to be found in plain sight.


 

Blogger news

Blogroll

Most Reading