Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label 2012 alternate supporting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2012 alternate supporting. Show all posts

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2012: Results

Saturday, February 9, 2013

5. Tom Hanks in Cloud Atlas- Hanks plays six different characters and gives four lacking characterizations showing his lack of range as an actor. The two characters in his range though are fairly well handled actually, unfortunately he really misses with the others.
4. James Spader in Lincoln- Spader is a delight in his role as political operative. Creating a unique character and naturally adding a great deal of humor to his film.
3. Samuel L. Jackson in Django Unchained- Jackson gives a terrific performance giving one of brilliant absurdity but as well a fascinating depiction of pealing behind his character's facades.
2. Sam Rockwell in Seven Psychopaths-Rockwell does his thing to the extreme here, and if you want a Rockwellian performance get Sam Rockwell. Rockwell is great being extremely funny while managing to still bring weight at the same time.
1. Javier Bardem in Skyfall- Good Prediction Micheal Patison and RatedRStar. This is is incredible year for supporting actors. Its a shame the academy chose to award three veterans giving descent but not particularly special performances and two leading performances. My choice overall this year goes to Javier Bardem as the greatest Bond Villain of all time. He is fun, entertaining, menacing, as well as even moving in a strange way. A true achievement that is just a performance enjoyable to watch but as well fulfilling character piece.
Overall Rank:
  1. Javier Bardem in Skyfall
  2. Christopher Walken in Seven Psychopaths
  3. Sam Rockwell in Seven Psychopaths
  4. Samuel L. Jackson in Django Unchained
  5. Eddie Redmayne in Les Miserables 
  6. Woody Harrelson in Seven Psychopaths 
  7. Ben Whishaw in Cloud Atlas
  8. Leonardo DiCaprio in Django Unchained 
  9. James Spader in Lincoln 
  10. Tom Waits in Seven Psychopaths
  11. Ewan McGregor in The Impossible
  12. Bruce Willis in Looper
  13. Scoot McNairy in Killing Them Softly 
  14. Jason Clarke in Zero Dark Thirty
  15. Jim Broadbent in Cloud Atlas
  16. David Straithairn in Lincoln
  17. Edward Norton in Moonrise Kingdom
  18. Michael Fassbender in Prometheus 
  19. Ray Liotta in Killing Them Softly
  20. Ezra Miller in The Perks of Being a Wallflower 
  21. David Costabile in Lincoln
  22. Tom Hardy in The Dark Knight Rises
  23. Irrfan Khan in Life of Pi
  24. Bruce Willis in Moonrise Kingdom 
  25. Michael Shannon in Premium Rush 
  26. Aaron Tveit in Les Miserables 
  27. Andy Serkis in The Hobbit
  28. Bryan Cranston in Argo
  29. Russell Crowe in Les Miserables 
  30. James D'Arcy in Cloud Atlas 
  31. Dwight Henry in Beast of the Southern Wild
  32. Richard Jenkins in Killing Them Softly 
  33. Werner Herzog in Jack Reacher 
  34. Jim Sturgess in Cloud Atlas
  35. Jeff Daniels in Looper
  36. Josh Brolin in Men in Black 3
  37. Jared Harris in Lincoln 
  38. Matthew McConaughey in Bernie
  39. Ha Jung-Woo in Nameless Gangster
  40. Ben Whishaw in Skyfall 
  41. Jackie Earle Hayley in Lincoln 
  42. Tom Wilkinson in The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel
  43. Ian McKellen in The Hobbit 
  44. Albert Finney in Skyfall 
  45. Richard Armitage in The Hobbit 
  46. Robert De Niro in Silver Linings Playbook
  47. Hal Holbrook in Lincoln 
  48. Alan Arkin in Argo
  49. Scoot McNairy in Argo
  50. Bruce Dern in Django Unchained
  51. John Goodman in Argo
  52. Michael Wincott in Hitchcock
  53. Thomas Haden Church in Killer Joe
  54. Dallas Robert in The Grey
  55. Dermot Mulrooney in The Grey
  56. Chris Tucker in Silver Linings Playbook
  57. Tommy Lee Jones in Lincoln
  58. Guy Pearce in Lawless
  59. Ralph Fiennes in Skyfall
  60. Tom Hiddleston in The Avengers
  61. Tim Blake Nelson in Lincoln
  62. Harry Dean Stanton in Seven Psychopaths
  63. John Hawkes in Lincoln
  64. Mark Strong in Zero Dark Thirty 
  65. Michael Stuhlbarg in Seven Psychopaths
  66. Frank Grillo in The Grey
  67. Kyle Chandler in Zero Dark Thirty 
  68. Walton Goggins in Lincoln
  69. Don Johnson in Django Unchained
  70. Bill Nighy in The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel
  71. Michael Pitt in Seven Psychopaths
  72. Gary Oldman in The Dark Knight Rises
  73. Nate Parker in Arbitrage
  74. Walton Goggins in Django Unchained
  75. Bob Balaban in Moonrise Kingdom
  76. Michael Caine in The Dark Knight Rises
  77. Ben Mendelsohn in Killing Them Softly
  78. Sacha Baron Cohen in Les Miserables
  79. Michael Stuhlbarg in Lincoln 
  80. Jason Clarke in Lawless
  81. Joel Edgerton in Zero Dark Thirty
  82. Clark Gregg in The Avengers 
  83. Gulliver McGrath in Lincoln
  84. James Gandolfini in Killing Them Softly
  85. Joseph Gordon-Levitt in The Dark Knight Rises
  86. Bill Murray in Moonrise Kingdom
  87. Colm Wilkinson in Les Miserables 
  88. Bruce McGill in Lincoln
  89. Joseph Gordon-Levitt in Lincoln
  90. Keith David in Cloud Atlas
  91. Tom Conti in The Dark Knight Rises
  92. Woody Harrelson in The Hunger Games
  93. Jesse Plemons in The Master
  94. Don Cheadle in Flight
  95. James D'Arcy in Hitchcock
  96. Gary Oldman in Lawless
  97. Bruce Greenwood in Flight
  98. Lee Pace in Lincoln
  99. Jeremy Renner in The Avengers
  100. Donald Sutherland in The Hunger Games
  101. Daniel Huttlestone in Les Miserables
  102. John Ortiz in Silver Linings Playbook
  103. Rory Kinnear in Skyfall 
  104. Stanley Tucci in The Hunger Games
  105. Brian Geraghty in Flight
  106. Lenny Kravitz in The Hunger Games
  107. Morgan Freeman in The Dark Knight Rises
  108. James Badge Dale in Flight
  109. William H. Macy in The Sessions
  110. Hugo Weaving in Cloud Atlas
  111. Anupam Kher in Silver Linings Playbook
  112. Rafe Spall in Life Of Pi
  113. Pierce Gagnon in Looper
  114. Michael Stuhlbarg in Men in Black 3
  115. Josh Hutcherson in The Hunger Games
  116. Tom Hanks in Cloud Atlas 
  117. Matthew Modine in The Dark Knight Rises
  118. Hugh Grant in Cloud Atlas
  119. Logan Marshall-Green in Prometheus
  120. Liam Hemsworth in The Hunger Games
  121. Guy Pearce in Prometheus
  122. Dash Mihok in Silver Linings Playbook
  123. Rafe Spall in Prometheus
  124. Paul Dano in Looper
  125. David Oyelowo in Lincoln
  126. Ben Mendelsohn in The Dark Knight Rises
  127. Wes Bentley in The Hunger Games
  128. John Goodman in Flight
  129. Jemaine Clement in Men in Black 3
  130. The Cast of The Expendables 2
  131. Aasif Mandiv in Premium Rush
  132. Wole Parks in Premium Rush
 Next Year: 2012 Lead

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2012: James Spader and David Strathairn in Lincoln

    James Spader did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying William N. Bilbo in Lincoln.

    One thing that is a common occurrence these days is films even with large ensembles, even ones with multiple great performances in them, only one performance from the supporting cast will be recognized consistently. This certainly true of Lincoln which despite having a large cast it was apparently determined by both the film industry and critics groups that Tommy Lee Jones was the only supporting player worth mentioning in the film. Although this very well may be that Jones has the flashiest role in the entire film as every scene he has seems to be an Oscar scene of course just because he flashiest role in the film does not mean he is the best supporting player in the film.

    James Spader plays one of Secretary of State Seward's political operative whose whole point is to try to sway votes through offering political appointments. Spader in the first scene we see him very much tries to make a very unique character out of Bilbo as a very particular sort of man. Everything from the way he sits, to the way he speak, to the way he smokes, to the way he sweats is something that very much makes him a man who sticks out. All of these things Spader does only succeeds in amplifying Bilbo as a character, making him far more memorable as well as giving some indication to where exactly this man came from.

    Spader honestly has quite a challenge to stick out because he comes in and out of the film for only short periods of time, even seconds in some cases. Spader though does make the impact he should with his role as Bilbo and he is always a delight whenever he does appear. His comedic chops here are impeccable as they are very much in character and much of the humor derives from his gruff and spent demeanor. His timing is marvelous making a humorous moment whenever he does have the chance, that are always very amusing but still what he does always fits entirely with the rest of the film.

    Importantly Spader does as well shows the cunning of this odd man and in his expressions he suggests a very real intelligence within Bilbo's haggard carcass. A particularly strong moment is just a quick little look which is toward one of the congressmen he has been pressuring. The point and look is perfect and it only helps in making it believable that the congressman would decide to vote the right way. This is a short but very sweet performance by James Spader taking the spotlight in just the right way that adds to the film so nicely without seeming like a forced character in the least. He uses what he has wonderfully well giving an entertaining supporting performance, that only left me wanting to see more of his unique character. 
    David Strathairn did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Secretary of State William Seward in Lincoln.

    David Strathairn portrays William Seward one of the Lincoln closest confidants, and one of the men who works tirelessly to try to get the amendment passed. In his first scene Strathairn is very good in setting up Seward's very specific role which is being the friend to Lincoln who asks the difficult questions. In his opening scene he describes the pressures and troubles involved with passing the amendment to Lincoln in a direct fashion. Strathairn is very good because he establishes, along with Daniel Day-Lewis as Lincoln, the working relationship between the two men.

    Strathairn does two very important things in every moment in which he pressures Lincoln about his choices and tactics. The first is that he shows Seward to be a forceful man, and one who really does put a great deal of force in his questions that he asks Valjean. Strathairn makes Seward an incisive man who very much does get right to the point with Lincoln. At the same time though he also does show that the two are very much friends, and even when he is asking Lincoln the hard questions. There is always a certain warmth too in his demeanor towards Lincoln that shows that it is due to his concern for his friend that he asks these questions.

    In scenes with his political operatives Seward is very good portraying Seward as man with a great deal of experience, who certainly knows what must be done. He expresses quite well not only the knowledge of Seward, but as well in a subtle fashions his frustrations to have to fall into a lower level to do what must be done to get the amendment moving forward. Unlike Tommy Lee Jones he does not get a lot of time to portray this personal struggle in Seward, yet the great thing about this performance is that he still manages to bring this life within his performance even with the little time offered to him.

    This is for the most part a very subtle performance by David Strathairn after all he does not get a single scene devoted entirely to himself, unlike a certain co-star. This leaves a lot of what he must do is in his reactions in the scenes where Lincoln is in meeting. Now Strathairn does his very best to reflect Seward's feelings through the struggle for the amendment. Strathairn extra effort is quite impressive considering the limitations. Strathairn is always very spot on in every moment reflecting Seward's concerns skillfully particularly in displaying the difference between him as Lincoln as there is hint a pessimism in his face something missing from Lincoln. 

    Strathairn definitely gets the short end of the stick here as Seward seems like he might have been far more in an earlier draft. Its a real shame how Seward is treated considering what Strathairn is able to accomplish with little he is given. I really find it odd the way there is not even a mention of him at the end considering Seward was severely injured, and was almost killed at the same time as Lincoln. I mean come on, the film could have at least had one line from Lincoln in regards to Seward before he goes off to Ford's theater, and even though we would not see him it could at least shown us one last indications of their relationship. Nevertheless this is a good performance since Strathairn left me only wanting more of Seward's story, something that I could not say about Tommy Lee Jones.

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2012: Sam Rockwell, Christopher Walken, Woody Harrelson, and Tom Waits in Seven Psychopaths

    Friday, February 8, 2013

    Sam did not receive an Oscar nomination, although he was nominated for an Independent Spirit Award, for portraying Billy Bickle in Seven Psychopaths.

    Seven Psychopaths is another great film from Martin McDonagh, its not quite as good as In Bruges, but what films are? Anyway this time its about a screen writer Marty (Colin Farrell) who struggles to write a film all while insanity transpires around him due to his dog napper friend who steals the prized dog of a mobster.

    Sam Rockwell plays Marty's friend Billy with the same last name as Robert De Niro troubled character Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver. Rockwell here probably gives his Rockwelliest performance as an actor, who just might be living a few too many lives all at once. He has dog napping business, has an affair with a mobster's girlfriend, and he seems to know maybe a little too much about a secretive killer who kills mobster known as the Jack of Diamonds. Rockwell plays the role in his sort of man child type style although to its most extreme here as Billy. The best word to describe him in this really is wacky.

    Rockwell pretty much takes on the role of Billy as just about a looney toon character with his incredibly exaggerated faces he makes throughout the film when expressing himself. As I said in my review of the Django Unchained supporting actors it is risk for an actor to give a very exaggerated performance. Sam Rockwell is definitely an actor who can do this because Rockwell does it all so naturally. Yes he plays Billy as a wacky sort of guy, but hey Rockwell definitely makes him a believable wacky sort of guy. He never seems like he is acting in any way, and it unlikely that many actors could play Billy quite like Rockwell is able to do.

    Most of the film Rockwell plays Billy as the crazy friend, and does it quite well actually getting the most out of Billy's impulsive behavior as well as making this just an enjoyable character to watch. Rockwell has a lot of good lines to say throughout the film, and he delivers them quite fantastically. My personal favorite is when he reacts to Marty's idea that his film about psychopaths should not have any shoot outs, Rockwell's annoyed disbelief he brings out in Billy due to this idea is absolutely hilarious. Rockwell has multiple times in the film with similar expert timing, and this is a very funny performance.

    This is basically a fairly lighter work by Sam Rockwell for the most part, and a lot of him is just doing his Rockwell thing. This is something that is absolutely fine after all no one can do what Rockwell does here. Martin McDonaghs' script serves him particularly well here, and it really lets him basically let loose with all of his various tricks which are quite enjoyable to see him do. In fact there are multiple points where there are scenes that are there to really just let Rockwell do what he does like when he describes how the film should conclude. Rockwell simply is great at doing this wild youthful enthusiasm, and absolutely makes all of these scenes work.

    Now there are semi weightier scenes but mostly they are just there to show the friendship between Billy and Marty. It is very much underplayed but Farrell and Rockwell still bring about the friendship just as they should making the ending to the film appropriately moving. One could argue the reveal in the film that he is the psychopathic murderer of mobster is a big reveal, but once the reveal occurs it seems more like just a proper conclusion more than any else. Rockwell does well to not change his performance at all from this conclusion since it is more of just showing how far his impulsive behavior goes, and really Rockwell does well in showing that his murdering is just another thing he does.

    Sam Rockwell is extremely likable here, and I really loved his performance here just like any other time Rockwell gets to do his thing. He is one of those actors that has an uncanny ability to be a full on comedic performance which is very  funny as he is here, yet still at the very same time bring a weight to the proceedings that is rather surprising. In his last scene he really makes the epitome of this as he moves through the scene in his sly fashion that is very funny, but at the same time his final exchanges to Farrell's characters at the end of the film has the power he should. Rockwell is able to be as lighthearted as possible in this role making a very violent shoot out just a fun time, but at the same exact time brings a great deal of heart when it is called for. Rockwell achieves this dynamic so easily that it is a true testament to his talent.
    Christopher Walken did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Hans Kieslowski in Seven Psychopaths.

    Christopher Walken plays another one of the psychopaths who is a bit of strange one considering he is a religious pacifist. Walken is probably one of the greatest actors ever when he chooses to be, and there are plenty of films where he just relies on his unique way of speaking for his performance luckily this is not one of those films. Interestingly like in the Deer Hunter and Catch Me If You Can he seems to actually tone down his speech pattern, its there, but his character he is clearly always his primary concern. 

    Where Sam Rockwell is the life of the picture Christopher Walken is the heart as Billy's dog napper partner. Walken really gives the most dramatic performance in the film, although being a Martin McDonagh film there still is plenty of room for Walken to get in on the humor as well. Although where Rockwell was mostly a comedic performance with some moments of weight, Walken's gives mostly a weightier performance with some moments of comedy. Frankly the two of them fill this dynamic of the characters quite brilliantly, and the two add to the picture so well through playing their roles so they fit together in a fulfilling fashion.

    Walken plays Hans as a fairly quiet old man making money from his very petty crimes, and making sure to visit his cancer stricken wife Myra (Linda Bright Clay) just about every day. In his brief early scenes Walken does well to establish Hans a likable and quirky but naturally quirky old man who is very devoted to his beliefs as well as his wife. There are two short scenes with Hans and his wife which are excellently acted by both Walken and Clay. They have a natural chemistry in their scenes with a great deal of warmth, and the two establish the long romantic history between the two quite well, this particularly important since Hans's wife soon exits the picture.

    Hans quickly suffers worse grief than his wife dying from cancer as she is murdered by the mobster whose dog he and Billy stole. Walken is quite effective in this as he is very much brings about the philosophy of Hans's which is being very much in the right without much reflection to this fact. Walken is terrific in the scene where he confronts the mobster after he has murdered his wife. Walken is excellent in just that stare he gives to the man that reflects clearly that he is going through pain, but as well portrays Hans very much righteous anger that he intensely yet almost silently pressures the mobster. 

    Walken is very good in his scenes with Farrell and Rockwell and the three make for some great scenes. With Rockwell as Billy being very much for violence, Farrell's Marty being very unsure of everything, and Walken showing Hans as being a man firm in his pacifism that make the three really a wonderful group. Walken gives a strong performance here and he brings to life the philosophy of his character to life quite powerfully. He is particularly good because the way he is not at all forceful about it. Instead Walken to be both quiet yet still very passionate in his beliefs, and adds a great deal of poignancy to the proceedings.

    Hans easily could have been forgotten in face of Billy's antics, but Walken knows how to keep himself in a scene and he and Rockwell are great together. Their best moment in particularly is when Hans believes that he saw a vision of his wife that makes him think the afterlife is grey, but Billy claims he merely imitated his wife. He and Rockwell are magnificent in the bringing a strange power to the moment, and Walken could not be better as he so beautifully shows Hans regain his faith in just the slightest smile. This is a very effective performance by Christopher Walken becuase he is just so genuine in his realization of Hans.

    Walken as well does have his nice moments of humor that are short most in his reactions to Billy, which are always played brilliantly. He even derives the proper humor just from how assured Hans is in his pacifistic position, and his delivery of "Too Bad" to a man wondering how Hans can ignore the man's gun is properly hilarious. This performance here shows what a shame it is that Christopher Walken does not try more often becuase when he gives it his all Walken has an emotional resonance that few other actors are able to create.
    Woody Harrelson did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Charlie Costello in Seven Psychopaths.

    Woody Harrelson is decidedly not one of my favorite actors because he tends to show a great deal of talent with his performances but tends to waste it by pointlessly overacting in his roles. He is in a Martin McDonagh film though and with In Bruges and this as indicators he seems to bring the best out of his actors. Harrelson tones down his problematic tendencies here, and gives a more restrained performance that usual which is rather funny considering he plays a psychotic gangster who is the main villain of the film.

    Harrelson here does two things in the role and he does those two things quite well. The first being a properly threatening presence in the film. The scene where he slowly talks to Hans's wife figuring out who she is than eventually killing her is played extremely well by Harrelson. What makes the scene so good is how casual Harrelson is in his portraying the mobster's moment that he figures out who she is. He brings out the brutality of the scene becuase he makes Costello's interrogation to the murder such a natural process. 

    The other thing that Harrelson does here is be quite an amusing presence to just the right amount. He never compromises the overarching the intensity of Costello as a vicious killer despite having some very funny moments that comes from just how much this mobster loves his dog. These moments could easily been way over played to the point of silliness yet Harrelson gives so much conviction to them. He makes the concern of this killer for his little dog entirely genuine that is actually a little sweet while being absolutely hilarious at the very same time.

    Harrelson through the film makes just the perfect oddity that is Charlie Costello. He makes him convincing as just a pure killer, and because of that he gets so much humor from his role. My particular favorite moment of his performance is when comes to get his dog from Billy, and comes unarmed and alone just like Billy said. His expression when Billy just randomly shoots him in the back despite the fact he is fully complying made me burst out laughing. Harrelson is so good here becuase for the most part he could be a gangster in a serious film, and it is much funnier when that sort of gangster does the stupid things Charlie does.

    This is a fantastic performance by Harrelson where he uses his considerable talent without ever going over board despite the strange dynamic that exists within his character here. He realizes that dynamic so well through finding just the perfect tone for Charlie. He never forgets to bring the ruthlessness of character in equal measure with the humor of his character. It just incredible the way he, Rockwell, and Walken all are able to share the film together so well. They all have their great individual moments, but they each play off of each other just as well.
    Tom Waits did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Zachariah Rigby in Seven Psychopaths.

    Tom Waits the musician turned character actor is someone who you expect at least something from one he appears in a film as he has such a unique screen presence which is certianly used to great affect here as Zachariah a psychopath who shows up to be interviewed after answering Billy's call for psychopaths. Waits here is basically a one scene performance as rabbit petting serial killer who spent time of his youth with a young woman going around the country murdering serial killers. Waits doesn't have a lot of time but he makes the most of it.

    Waits's part of the story basically acts as a bit of a diversion for the plot, and easily could have seemed like a big waste of time. Waits therefore has quite a challenge to make sure Zachariah's story doesn't seem like a waste of time, and he certianly pulls through. Waits is very much takes a slightly somber dead pan tone as Zachariah that works particularly well in telling a story of such insanity. It is the right approach and again just like his fellow performers in this film he brings a strange combination of weight and humor that feels entirely seamless.

    The reason all four of these performances work is that they each take such a differing approaches with each of the actors. None of them try to replicate each other, and Waits's mostly dead pan take is very effective. The way he says he doesn't think he sounded crazy is very amusing, and his telling of the story is certainly quite bizarre something Waits specializes bringing to screen with an absolute ease. He tells the story and makes the story of the two killers surprisingly poignant.

    Waits simply adds to the strength of this film with his short little story. Tom Waits is basically a one scene wonder, although his credits sting scene is also a very entertaining moment, and he is as a one scene wonder should be. He holds the film in his command for his brief time, and is properly interesting and intriguing the point that I certainly would not have minded some more of Waits. He takes the time he has, does everything he can with it, and just is another reason why this is a great film.

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2012: Javier Bardem in Skyfall

    Javier Bardem did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Bafta, Sag, and Critic's choice, for portraying Raoul Silva in Skyfall.

    Skyfall is terrific action film, and probably my favorite Bond film of all time.

    One of the reasons for that is that it contains my favorite Bond villain of all time beating out one of my very favorite actors who played one of Bond's earliest adversaries. Bardem holds the distinction as the actor to come the closest to ever being Oscar nominated for his role as he did receive most of the important precursors, but he lost out in the end. The academy apparently preferred Alan Arkin giving a less complex version of his Oscar winning performance than Javier Bardem once again playing a villain. Although Bardem's performance here as Raoul Silva could not be more different from Bardem Oscar winning turn as Anton Chigurh in No Country For Old Men.

    Bardem takes a long time to actually appear in the film, and there is quite a bit of build up for his character as we already know many of his actions therefore Javier Bardem is required to meet these expectations, and does that quite brilliantly in his first scene. The entrance of Silva is something truly special not only the brilliant way it is shot, but as well Bardem flawless delivery of Silva's opening monologue. Bardem is outstanding making this monologue a fantastic way to introduce the character. Bardem establishes the very unique style that Silva has a villain with his method of delivery, but as well brilliantly through that final look we see the underlying connection between Bond and Silva.

    In regards to his style Bardem really makes Silva a memorable villain that is the polar opposite of his previous villainous turn in a film. As Chigurh he was extremely reserved in his depiction of that psychopath. He barely spoke, and his intensity was in his silent uncompromising stare. As Silva though Bardem is as lively as one can be as shown in his opening story he tells from the was he says plop, to the way he nibbles when describing the rats. Bardem has a great deal of fun in the role and is extremely energetic in his performance and seems to be almost tirelessly trying to make Silva a memorable villain. Bardem efforts pay off beautifully and he does just that with this character.

    Something particularly fascinating about this performance that attests to the talent of Bardem as a performer is the way he brings out such menace in such a different style. He was of course chilling as possible really as Chigurh in No Country For Old Men in being as cold as a character can be. Here as Silva he is definitely is more emotional about the whole thing on one side but is just a dismissive of murder as Chigurh. Where Chigurh kills with a distributing expressionless demeanor, Bardem shows Silva kill with a gleeful smile on his face that is equally effective. The way Bardem plays the scene where he kills his girlfriend, Bardem plays it like Silva is simply done with a toy he had enough fun with, which is equally chilling to the way he was in No Country For Old Men. 

    Bardem is excellent as he knows just how flamboyant to make Silva without overplaying his hand. He plays him up as a larger than life villain for sure as James Bond villain should be, but he holds the proper restraints to keep him as a convincing character fitting to the film at hand. On the flamboyant side every little mannerism that he does do, only does add to his characterization of this man basking very much in his "glorious" accomplishments. The joy one can have just watching an actor perform is always something wonderful when an actor achieves that. Bardem does that in his performance here, and it is simply entertaining to watch him perform as Silva.

    Already being entertaining to watch is certianly a plus to begin with but Bardem does not stop there and seeks to make Silva into even more. This starts in the early moment where he seems to be coming on to James Bond. Bardem allows several interpretations to this scene as is certianly shows that Silva is quite enjoying being so close to Bond, but as well by the way he breaks off the scene when he does not seem to bothering Bond at all that perhaps it was just Silva playing a bit of game. There is the whole brilliant play Bardem uses in these early scenes never allowing you to never really get a full read on Silva at any point. Bardem will play one moment with such conviction making it seem like Silva is going one way, but then he is equally convincing in Silva's instant rejection of his earlier behavior.

    Bardem creates such a terrific dynamic within the character of Silva, and my personal favorite moment of him doing this is when he confronts M (Judi Dench) with his disfigurement that he received from being given up while he was an agent under her command. The moment is great, and Bardem almost makes you feel sorry for Silva as he pleads with M to say his real name. He is absolutely genuine in showing the pain Silva has over this betrayal that he suffered and he sets up brilliantly where the intense hatred Silva feels for her comes from. The incredible thing though is after portraying Silva so tragically well the moment after M and Bond leaves that knowing smile returns to Silva and he seems to instantly laugh off his pain from earlier. Bardem has a tremendous amount of fun leaving Silva with the right amount of mystery he should have.

    A fascinating thing about Bardem's performance here is the subtlety he does infuse into the role despite the fact that this tends to be something quite rare for a villain in an action film. Bardem of course is very strong in being as imposing as he should be, and he makes Silva threatening with such ease of his performance that frankly he allows himself to bring even more texture to the role. My second personal favorite moment of his entire performance comes when Silva seems like he is absolutely going to completely succeed in his plan. He comes so close, and it is interesting becuase Bardem plays it that the reason he fails is Silva's own hesitation. The moment right before he is going to shoot M is a outstanding moment for him in his reaction where in his face we see the hatred, the pleasure in his face, but as well a reluctance that Bardem makes to be almost a disbelief that he has been able to accomplish his goal.

    Javier Bardem actually is not in the film all that much since he takes awhile to appear as I stated and then he even disappears and reappears. Bardem though makes the most of everyone of his scenes though and importantly in the scenes we do see him he makes sure we do not forget him when he is off the screen. Silva is quite the accomplishment becuase by having him as flamboyant as he is, and even quite humorous as well Bardem risked Silva being not entirely convincing as villain. Bardem though of course never allows this to be, and he honestly makes the drive within Silva something that seems to be one thing he definitely does not joke about. Even when he seems to be entirely joking around in a scene, Bardem is extremely effective by showing behind it all there is a vicious determination. This determination that is truly fierce when his plan is the only thing on his mind, it is terrific the way Bardem brings this out.

    Bardem brings the most to everyone of his scenes infusing so much style and energy into every second he's on screen. My number one personal favorite moment of his performance is when he once again gets to confront M. He aims his gun and he seems to cry out in a pained anger. It is a fantastic moment suggesting he definitely hates M, and wants to kill her, but that his connection to her from the past leaves him unable to just break it so easily. The idea of having Silva try to do due a murder-suicide pact with M seems absurd but Bardem is brilliant and makes it feel entirely genuine. Bardem through his earlier reactions suggests that really for Silva the only way he could be satisfied due to his history with her. He brings such weight to the end of his character, and it is amazing the way he honestly achieves this very character based moment in such an action packed conclusion. This is a great villianous performance that does more than anyone could ask for in such a role. He goes far beyond the call of duty here as Silva could easily have been far less than what Bardem brings with his portrayal.

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2012: Leonardo DiCaprio and Samuel L. Jackson in Django Unchained

    Thursday, February 7, 2013

    Leonardo DiCaprio did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Golden Globe and winning the NBR, for portraying Calvin Candie in Django Unchained.

    Leonardo DiCaprio seemed pretty assured of a nomination for this film playing against his usual type of hero by playing a nasty unrepentant villain. I suppose maybe he needed to ugly himself up more than just with his teeth. Also though more importantly he probably had a hard time getting what seemed to be the "cool" vote that was being competed for by Waltz, DiCaprio, and Javier Bardem. DiCaprio had a serious handicap in that Waltz was leading and he was not in the same exact film. In the end there was really just too much against him to get that nomination, and Bardem very well might have been the sixth place in terms of votes.

    Leonardo DiCaprio for awhile now has been playing some roles of men who are suffering something whether it is a terrible marriage, the stress of being an undercover cop, or having dead wives. Understandably these have not exactly been the most jovial of performances that is why it is quite nice to see DiCaprio take on such a different sort of character here. DiCaprio plays a horrendous character here as Calvin Candie a plantation owner who loves to indulge in Mandingo fighting which is having his slaves fight to the death in hand to hand combat. Despite the lowly nature of the character this is one of the liveliest performances DiCaprio has ever given.

    DiCaprio makes Calvin Candie who loves all that he does, and loves his life in general. DiCaprio makes Calvin Candie a man who has no hesitations about what he does with all of his slaves. DiCaprio in the first scene is unabashed in showing that Calvin Candie is just enjoying himself, and this perfectly fitting for a man who always has been a slaver, therefore would never have any second thoughts on the subject. It is quite an effective way to portray the character, and even well watching two men kill each other DiCaprio has Calvin act like it is some sort of casual sport simply there just for his amusement.

    Leonardo DiCaprio takes on the role with a specific manner and style which is that of the stereotypical southern gentleman. They are quite effectively done in a humorous fashion, although not to the point that he becomes a full on parody. He makes his accent and his manner infused properly into his characterization and only amplifies the dynamic between his pleasant demeanor and his horrible actions. DiCaprio's performance is very overt in his style here in the way he emphasizes every line he has, and he is very entertaining because of frankly how much he does play up his character's particular manner.

    It should be noted that as well as just being an entertaining character he is an effective villain as well. Although Calvin is being duped by freed slave Django (Jamie Foxx), and bounty hunter King Schultz (Christoph Waltz) for most of DiCaprio screen time there are very important moments during this where he is quite strong in portraying the evil nature of the man. The most effective being of when he orders that an escaped slave be fed alive to dogs. DiCaprio is terrific in the way he shows how casual Candie is about the whole thing, but also his reaction when Schultz offers to save the slave is particularly well handled. In the short moment DiCaprio expresses the confusion, and suspicion in the eyes of Calvin well, and properly establishes the idea that their ruse probably will be broken.

    We follow the two as they lead up to Calvin's plantation which brings them us to Samuel L. Jackson who also was not Oscar nominated for portraying the role of Stephen in this film. When DiCaprio first appears he comes on strong, but when Jackson shows up he practically devours the scenery as Calvin Candie's head slave Stephen. Jackson shows up playing the part almost like one of those stereotypes of black people found in some of the films of the 1930s. Jackson though of course does in a very knowing fashion and makes Stephen a tremendous burst of energy for the film right when it needs it.

    Jackson just like DiCaprio portrays his character as unabashedly racist. As strange as it might sound he makes Stephen seem even more racist that Calvin if that is possible. Jackson is incredibly good here with everything he does with Stephen from his over the top limp to his excessively fussy manner of speaking as well as his wild expressions. Jackson teeters brilliantly on that tightrope that is overacting. Overacting is something that only some actors can do, and if an actor is to do it they better have good a reason for doing so. Jackson is an actor who can overact, and he is has a very good reason for doing so as the head house slave Stephen.

    Jackson perfectly plays up the absurdity of this character which certainly makes since considering that Stephen who considers his own kind lowly, and seems to love being a slave. He makes the absolute most of his material here actualyl being rather hilarious in just how absurdly racist Stephen is in the way he reacts to Django and basically cannot fathom a black man as a free man, as well as espouses extremely loudly, even louder than Calvin, how poorly he thinks of his own kind. Jackson is great here because although he is playing what is essentially a cartoon in a way, he makes Stephen into an actual character still in his own right and is believable as this very odd sort of man.

    Now after we are introduced to Stephen Calvin Schultz, and Django sit down to dinner with Stephen in attendance. This scene is where he and DiCaprio's performance come together in perfect harmony, and the two play well along with Christoph Waltz as well. Jackson and DiCaprio are excellent creating the very particularity camaraderie between the two. DiCaprio, Jackson, and Waltz all together make this just a wonderful scene. DiCaprio and Jackson are extremely amusing here with DiCaprio playing up Calvin's faux suaveness, and Jackson making Stephen's uncouthness as well as his toady that mostly entails him laughing at everything Calvin's says extremely funny as well as showing the dynamic they have when in the company of others.

    Jackson and DiCaprio are really toe to toe until this point, but then we see a very different side of Stephen. When Stephen is not in plain view of others and is taking care of the house hold business we see a very different man. He is almost daffy in the open but suddenly Stephen becomes a commanding presence that seems to be the truer aspect of this man. Jackson is outstanding the way he breaks all expectations he created by Stephen's behavior beforehand was only his very own ruse, and in fact he seems in more of control of everything that Calvin is. Jackson is particularly strong in the dinner scene because one moment in front of the guests he seems his daffy self than when he takes Django's wife Broomhilda to the backroom he absolutely chilling in portraying Stephen incisive interrogation. 

    What is incredible though is when Stephen requests a meeting with Calvin we see that even with the other slaves Stephen still is putting on a little, and Jackson is terrific the way he loses any of the weaknesses Stephen suggests in the situation and in fact seems to be even in charge of Calvin in a way. He is excellent because he makes the dichotomy of this man believable, and slowly uncovers it in a fantastic fashion to the greatest affect. Jackson overrides DiCaprio as the man villain as Stephen is the one who actually spots the game of Django and Schultz which is shown in a brilliant moment for Jackson. Jackson is extremely good showing both sides of Stephen at the same time first saying in his more aloof fashion that they should all look at Broomhilda's scars than though when seeing Django's reaction we see the intelligent decisive Stephen come out.

    Of course this is not to say DiCaprio takes just a oreback seat and he comes back for one more set of scenes after Calvin learns the truth. DiCaprio is excellent as the intensity of Calvin comes out more, which works because he properly suggested earlier on. My only complaint would be that when DiCaprio yells he loses his accent a bit, and it is the only time he loses his strength as Calvin at all. Still he makes up for it through his quieter moments of Calvin's threats to Django and Schultz. For example when he breaks the glass and yells his threat that they will be shot he goes off the proper chart of Calvin a little bit, but he more than makes up for when later he quietly indicates to his man to murder Broomhilda if Schultz does not shake his hand. Really my complaints of this performance are nitpicks, and it is a very effective villianous turn by Dicaprio.
    (For DiCaprio)
    Now Calvin leaves but Stephen stays and we get the last thirty minutes of the picture which are by far the weakest parts of the film. If there is a saving grace of the last thirty minutes it definitely is we get more of Jackson. His threat to Django is a stunning scene and Jackson brings out the grim brutality of the situation in a fantastic fashion. Now this is wasted a bit by Quentin Tarantino by having the mining company that is suppose to be far more horrible than they turn out to be, unless of course Jackson was really talking about their acting than thanks to Tarantino's performance Stephen was right. Later on Jackson gets another great scene where Stephen defiantly stands showing the true Stephen. Of course Tarantino's wastes this again by just getting another scene of Django far too easily taking care of the situation rather than a showdown between the two which would have been far more interesting and satisfying. Anyway Jackson's efforts here at the end are great, and honestly he alone makes me feel that the last thirty minutes are not a complete waste of time. He uses the time to make Stephen a truly imposing villain, even if Tarantino's wastes it does not diminish Jackson's achievement which is tremendous.
    (For Jackson)

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2012: Tom Hanks, Jim Broadbent, Ben Whishaw and Hugo Weaving in Cloud Atlas

    Tuesday, February 5, 2013

    Tom Hanks did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Dr. Henry Goose, Hotel Manger, Isaac Sachs, Dermot Hoggins, Timothy Cavendish look-a-like actor, and Zachary in Cloud Atlas.

    Cloud Atlas is another film this year like Les Miserables, or The Master where you tap into its wavelength, or you do not, and if you do not you are in for a long watch. For me personally Cloud Atlas really works and I was thoroughly entertained and intrigued by it.

    Cloud Atlas is not a perfect film, and there are questionable choices in it. One being the few actors cast who are decidedly not chameleon. Tom Hanks is one of them and looking at this performance can easily be done by thinking what would Gary Oldman do. Hanks plays six roles and it is really best to look at each of the roles separately and see Hanks's attempts in each role. The first chronologically is that of Dr. Henry Goose who pretends to help an American Lawyer Adam Ewing (Jim Sturgess) recover from a parasitic worm, where in fact Goose is slowly poisoning the man and intends to kill him to rob him of his gold. This is a unique role for Hanks doing an accent as well as playing a villain.

    It would seem this sort of role is not for Hanks as he is not very menacing nor as enjoyable as the greedy Goose probably could have been in say the hands of Gary Oldman. Hanks seems a little silly in the role actually, and the makeup never seems to fit him. It does not help that Hanks never seems all that comfortable with the accent either leaving him rather uninteresting to say the least. Honestly there was a great deal of potential for Goose to really be a great turn, but Hanks just really does not have the command of the role that is really required for an excellent villianous turn.

    Well we can skip the Hotel Manager as he is basically just Goose again just with less screen time. Next he comes as Isaac Sachs a Nuclear scientist who attempts to help journalist Luisa Rey (Halle Berry). Hanks is far more comfortable in this role brings out his best qualities as just an average role. He is good at showing the decency of his character, and naturally brings about the connection Sacs feels with Rey. It is a very short role though, and he really is only in one scene as Sacs leaving the good qualities of this performance fairly easy to forget.

    Next is a double display of lacking as he plays Dermot Hoggins as the actor playing Timothy Cavendish. Hoggins is quick scene of a deranged gangster who kills a critic for dissing his book. Again a sort like Gary Oldman could have knocked this scene out of the park and turned the rage of Hoggins into a hilarious overstatement. Hanks though lacks the punch in his performance and just seems silly in the get up as well as with his heavy accent. The same is true as the actor reenacting Jim Broadbent's story. Another actors could had a lot of fun in the brief scenes, but Hanks plays it oddly straight and does not make much of an impact. 

    The last segment as Zachary in a post apocalyptic land as a tribesman Zachary plagued by guilt due to not acting when his brother and nephew were killed by roaming cannibals. Now even this segment has problems with the future speak used which almost none of the actors are comfortable with. All filmmakers who decide to do something like this should always remember there are things called Shakespearean actors for a reason, even if you make up a derivative of English actors still need to be comfortable with it, but when the actors speak here they always seem somewhat rehearsed.

    Hanks though does have good moments in his silent reactions in these scenes as Zachary, and he has powerful moments showing the painful struggle he is facing due to his loss as well as his feelings of guilt. For the most part this is a fairly effective piece of work by Tom Hanks in these scenes even if he never makes the words entirely natural. He has quite a bit power in his scenes particularly when Zachary see his entire village destroyed, and brings the weight to these scenes as he should. So the final tally goes like this Goose -2, Manager-2, Sachs-2.5, Hoggins-1.5, Cavendish-1.5, Zachary-3.5 leaving him as a:
    Jim Broadbent  did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Captain Molyneux, Vyvyan Ayrs, Timothy Cavendish, Korean Musician, Prescient 2 in Cloud Atlas.

    Jim Broadbent is certainly an actor more capable of various characterization than the fairly limited Hanks, but he honestly only plays three roles the first three. The last two are null as you'd be hard pressed to notice him in those roles. So really I only need to examine his performances in the other three. The first two which are Captain Molyneux and Vyvyan Ayrs are can really be spoken together as they are similar with Ayrs basically being a more complex version of Molyneux. As both Broadbent plays arrogant men who are filled with their own sense of skill and power. 

    Broadbent does well in both roles and gets the cruel pompousness of these characters out. As Molyneux he is particularly good and Broadbent shows the brutal nature of the composer who makes Molyneux as the societal injustice he should be. Importantly though Broadbent does show a quieter nature to the man in a few scenes that helps establish the idea that this man does have some brilliance behind his less positive features. He makes this role completely suiting its needs which is to put the lead of this story, ambitious young composer Robert Frobisher, through hell and set the man on the course of dread and despair.

    Now the most important role of Jim Broadbent in the film is that of Timothy Cavendish the only story in the film that is a straight out comedy. It details a book publisher who must go into hiding when one of his writers demands payment that he does not have. He is in fact the lead of this story he is still supporting though of the film, as everyone is supporting the film here and not one actor leads the film. Broadbent fills a very important role in the story of Timothy Cavendish as he must bring a lighter touch to the film that alleviates some of the heavier elements of the film expressed in all of the other stories.

    Broadbent makes the story of Timothy Cavendish enjoyable one through his various reactions as Cavendish faces various bouts of bad luck. Broadbent is an effective comedic actor in that he is able to express the emotions honestly in each scene well making them amusing at the same time. Broadbent makes the ride of Cavendish an enjoyable one as he goes from running from the gangster to trying to escape from a jail like retirement home. Broadbent has a lot of fun in the role a he makes every comedic scene as entertaining as they should be. Broadbent is charming and likable as Cavendish, and makes The Ghastly Tale of Timothy Cavendish an easy story to watch play out.

    Broadbent adds well to the film in a way that Tom Hanks does not. Although he is certianly recognizable as Jim Broadbent in all of his important roles he differentiate them properly, and they work well in the nature of the film rather than seem distracting as it did for Hanks. Broadbent is particularly effective in giving entirely opposing performances as a fiendish composer, and a likable publisher. Frankly Broadbent's performance only helps in showing exactly what is wrong with Hanks's characterizations.
    Ben Whishaw did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Robert Frobisher in Cloud Atlas.

    Ben Whishaw actually plays five roles but they do not really matter in that they are very short and unnoticeable. To his credit though he is not distracting in the moments, and fulfills these roles as he should. They just do not amount to much which is fine though because he plays the meatier role of Robert Frobisher who is the main character of his story. His story being that of a young bi-sexual musician who goes to work with a forgotten but talented composer Vyvyan Ayrs (Jim Broadbent). Whishaw leads which is probably the weightiest story of the film, and the one that depends probably the most on the lead performance.

    Whishaw at the beginning of Frobisher's story shows him to be a young man with a great deal of energy who is enthusiastic at the prospect of composing a masterwork with Ayrs's help. Whishaw is quite good in emphasizes the ambitious qualities within Forbisher and makes his urge to create something remarkable something worthwhile. Frobisher's story easily could have been excessively uninteresting, or seem the story of just a selfish man. Whishaw though succeeds incredibly well by being very genuine with the feelings that Forbisher's feels that compels him to such a task.

    There are several narrations competing throughout the film each which make varying impacts. Whishaw's honestly adds the most to the film and there is something particularly compelling about his delivery. He infuses a tremendous amount of life to each and poignancy. every moment that Frobisher's the one we here on screen. There are a great deal of lines in the film about the interconnected nature of everyone and everything. Perhaps they don't leave these sort of lines for Tom Hanks for a reason as they really require a great deal of conviction to make them seem more than pretentious babble, Whishaw manages to bring this conviction.

    Whishaw adds a power to all of his scene through his turn as Frobisher. He is very effective later on as it seems less and less likely that he will achieve his dreams he falls into despair only holding on to finish his masterpiece. It is a moving performance by Whishaw because he never does overwhelm with the depression of the character. Instead there is something particularly special about his portrayal of this man's suicide because of the final moments of happiness before regulating himself to his fate. They are short subtle reactions by Whishaw but they beautifully show the complexity of the man as well as what Frobisher really has lost by committing suicide. Ben Whishaw gives a very strong performance here and despite only having one role of note actually is one of the most memorable portrayals in the film. The nature of the film that weaves in and out of each story and Whishaw always holds the proper amount of attention, and brings to life the story Robert Frobisher in a powerful fashion.
    Hugo Weaving did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Haskell Moore, Tadeusz Kesselring, Bill Smoke, Nurse Noakes, Boardman Mephi, and Old Georgie in Cloud Atlas.

    Hugo Weaving is best known for playing villains so they took this as reason to cast him as villianous character in five of his six characters. His only character who is not a villain can be quickly forgotten as he is only seen briefly and makes almost no impact on the film. Weaving basically takes a similar approach for three of the five villains so I might as well just look at the two most prevalent. Bill Smoke a hit man who is the purest of his villains here and the other three similar ones are only slight deviations from him. His other villain that is the most dissimilar is that of Nurse Noakes as Weaving in that role plays a female character. 

    As Bill Smoke shows signs of his role as Agent Smith in The Matrix, which is a good thing. Weaving is quite good at the evil maniacal stare, as well as the imposing delivery that brings to life the fierce some nature of his character well. Weaving knows how to deliver with a character like this as well as the other similar ones. He oozes menace with an ease and oddly enough a certain grace. He makes looking evil seem easy, and even though Bill Smoke is not given much time he makes him the proper threat from his very first scene. Weaving is perfectly cast in these roles because he knows exactly how to play them and brings out the evil of these characters quickly without effort even seeming required.

    It is a real shame though that Weaving's strengths shown with the other villains is rather wasted in the role of Nurse Noakes. Noakes is basically the Nurse Ratched of the retirement home that imprisons Timothy Cavendish. Weaving is not very good here basically doing the stereotypical voice that any man does to imitate a woman when they are not trying at all to believable. Noakes is indeed in the comedic section of the film so really he would not exactly have to be the most believable woman of all time, but Weaving performance is rather embarrassing instead. Frankly someone, like maybe Gary Oldman for example, could have brought out more menace in these scenes well being funny at the same time. Weaving is neither menacing or funny as Noakes.

    The last villianous performance by Weaving here is as Old Georgie, the representation of the devil, who haunts Tom Hanks's Zachary. Weaving here seems to be doing his best Tom Waits impression. To be perfectly honest this works out just fine, and Weaving is fine at being this existential evil. Old Georgie is pretty limited but Weaving is just as he should be. Hugo Weaving for the most part works as the go to evil doer for the film. Nurse Noakes weighs down his performance which unfortunate as that part could have easily been the highlight if he had delivered a better performance. This rest of his roles though Weaving fulfills them quite well particularly Bill Smoke.

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2012

    And The Nominees Were Not:

    Leonardo DiCaprio in Django Unchained

    Samuel L. Jackson in Django Unchained

    Sam Rockwell in Seven Psychopaths

    Christopher Walken in Seven Psychopaths

    Woody Harrelson in Seven Psychopaths

    Tom Waits in Seven Psychopaths

    Javier Bardem in Skyfall

    Tom Hanks in Cloud Atlas

    Jim Broadbent in Cloud Atlas

    Ben Whishaw in Cloud Atlas

    Hugo Weaving in Cloud Atlas

    James Spader in Lincoln

    David Strathairn in Lincoln

    Due to the ensemble nature of the year I have decided to review multiple performances in each film insane as that might be. To allow you to not go insane in attempting a prediction I will reduce the contest to only five.

    Nominees For Prediction Contest:

    Samuel L. Jackson in Django Unchained

    Sam Rockwell in Seven Psychopaths

    Javier Bardem in Skyfall

    Tom Hanks in Cloud Atlas

    James Spader in Lincoln 
     

    Blogger news

    Blogroll

    Most Reading