Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Woody Harrelson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Woody Harrelson. Show all posts

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2012: Sam Rockwell, Christopher Walken, Woody Harrelson, and Tom Waits in Seven Psychopaths

Friday, February 8, 2013

Sam did not receive an Oscar nomination, although he was nominated for an Independent Spirit Award, for portraying Billy Bickle in Seven Psychopaths.

Seven Psychopaths is another great film from Martin McDonagh, its not quite as good as In Bruges, but what films are? Anyway this time its about a screen writer Marty (Colin Farrell) who struggles to write a film all while insanity transpires around him due to his dog napper friend who steals the prized dog of a mobster.

Sam Rockwell plays Marty's friend Billy with the same last name as Robert De Niro troubled character Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver. Rockwell here probably gives his Rockwelliest performance as an actor, who just might be living a few too many lives all at once. He has dog napping business, has an affair with a mobster's girlfriend, and he seems to know maybe a little too much about a secretive killer who kills mobster known as the Jack of Diamonds. Rockwell plays the role in his sort of man child type style although to its most extreme here as Billy. The best word to describe him in this really is wacky.

Rockwell pretty much takes on the role of Billy as just about a looney toon character with his incredibly exaggerated faces he makes throughout the film when expressing himself. As I said in my review of the Django Unchained supporting actors it is risk for an actor to give a very exaggerated performance. Sam Rockwell is definitely an actor who can do this because Rockwell does it all so naturally. Yes he plays Billy as a wacky sort of guy, but hey Rockwell definitely makes him a believable wacky sort of guy. He never seems like he is acting in any way, and it unlikely that many actors could play Billy quite like Rockwell is able to do.

Most of the film Rockwell plays Billy as the crazy friend, and does it quite well actually getting the most out of Billy's impulsive behavior as well as making this just an enjoyable character to watch. Rockwell has a lot of good lines to say throughout the film, and he delivers them quite fantastically. My personal favorite is when he reacts to Marty's idea that his film about psychopaths should not have any shoot outs, Rockwell's annoyed disbelief he brings out in Billy due to this idea is absolutely hilarious. Rockwell has multiple times in the film with similar expert timing, and this is a very funny performance.

This is basically a fairly lighter work by Sam Rockwell for the most part, and a lot of him is just doing his Rockwell thing. This is something that is absolutely fine after all no one can do what Rockwell does here. Martin McDonaghs' script serves him particularly well here, and it really lets him basically let loose with all of his various tricks which are quite enjoyable to see him do. In fact there are multiple points where there are scenes that are there to really just let Rockwell do what he does like when he describes how the film should conclude. Rockwell simply is great at doing this wild youthful enthusiasm, and absolutely makes all of these scenes work.

Now there are semi weightier scenes but mostly they are just there to show the friendship between Billy and Marty. It is very much underplayed but Farrell and Rockwell still bring about the friendship just as they should making the ending to the film appropriately moving. One could argue the reveal in the film that he is the psychopathic murderer of mobster is a big reveal, but once the reveal occurs it seems more like just a proper conclusion more than any else. Rockwell does well to not change his performance at all from this conclusion since it is more of just showing how far his impulsive behavior goes, and really Rockwell does well in showing that his murdering is just another thing he does.

Sam Rockwell is extremely likable here, and I really loved his performance here just like any other time Rockwell gets to do his thing. He is one of those actors that has an uncanny ability to be a full on comedic performance which is very  funny as he is here, yet still at the very same time bring a weight to the proceedings that is rather surprising. In his last scene he really makes the epitome of this as he moves through the scene in his sly fashion that is very funny, but at the same time his final exchanges to Farrell's characters at the end of the film has the power he should. Rockwell is able to be as lighthearted as possible in this role making a very violent shoot out just a fun time, but at the same exact time brings a great deal of heart when it is called for. Rockwell achieves this dynamic so easily that it is a true testament to his talent.
Christopher Walken did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Hans Kieslowski in Seven Psychopaths.

Christopher Walken plays another one of the psychopaths who is a bit of strange one considering he is a religious pacifist. Walken is probably one of the greatest actors ever when he chooses to be, and there are plenty of films where he just relies on his unique way of speaking for his performance luckily this is not one of those films. Interestingly like in the Deer Hunter and Catch Me If You Can he seems to actually tone down his speech pattern, its there, but his character he is clearly always his primary concern. 

Where Sam Rockwell is the life of the picture Christopher Walken is the heart as Billy's dog napper partner. Walken really gives the most dramatic performance in the film, although being a Martin McDonagh film there still is plenty of room for Walken to get in on the humor as well. Although where Rockwell was mostly a comedic performance with some moments of weight, Walken's gives mostly a weightier performance with some moments of comedy. Frankly the two of them fill this dynamic of the characters quite brilliantly, and the two add to the picture so well through playing their roles so they fit together in a fulfilling fashion.

Walken plays Hans as a fairly quiet old man making money from his very petty crimes, and making sure to visit his cancer stricken wife Myra (Linda Bright Clay) just about every day. In his brief early scenes Walken does well to establish Hans a likable and quirky but naturally quirky old man who is very devoted to his beliefs as well as his wife. There are two short scenes with Hans and his wife which are excellently acted by both Walken and Clay. They have a natural chemistry in their scenes with a great deal of warmth, and the two establish the long romantic history between the two quite well, this particularly important since Hans's wife soon exits the picture.

Hans quickly suffers worse grief than his wife dying from cancer as she is murdered by the mobster whose dog he and Billy stole. Walken is quite effective in this as he is very much brings about the philosophy of Hans's which is being very much in the right without much reflection to this fact. Walken is terrific in the scene where he confronts the mobster after he has murdered his wife. Walken is excellent in just that stare he gives to the man that reflects clearly that he is going through pain, but as well portrays Hans very much righteous anger that he intensely yet almost silently pressures the mobster. 

Walken is very good in his scenes with Farrell and Rockwell and the three make for some great scenes. With Rockwell as Billy being very much for violence, Farrell's Marty being very unsure of everything, and Walken showing Hans as being a man firm in his pacifism that make the three really a wonderful group. Walken gives a strong performance here and he brings to life the philosophy of his character to life quite powerfully. He is particularly good because the way he is not at all forceful about it. Instead Walken to be both quiet yet still very passionate in his beliefs, and adds a great deal of poignancy to the proceedings.

Hans easily could have been forgotten in face of Billy's antics, but Walken knows how to keep himself in a scene and he and Rockwell are great together. Their best moment in particularly is when Hans believes that he saw a vision of his wife that makes him think the afterlife is grey, but Billy claims he merely imitated his wife. He and Rockwell are magnificent in the bringing a strange power to the moment, and Walken could not be better as he so beautifully shows Hans regain his faith in just the slightest smile. This is a very effective performance by Christopher Walken becuase he is just so genuine in his realization of Hans.

Walken as well does have his nice moments of humor that are short most in his reactions to Billy, which are always played brilliantly. He even derives the proper humor just from how assured Hans is in his pacifistic position, and his delivery of "Too Bad" to a man wondering how Hans can ignore the man's gun is properly hilarious. This performance here shows what a shame it is that Christopher Walken does not try more often becuase when he gives it his all Walken has an emotional resonance that few other actors are able to create.
Woody Harrelson did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Charlie Costello in Seven Psychopaths.

Woody Harrelson is decidedly not one of my favorite actors because he tends to show a great deal of talent with his performances but tends to waste it by pointlessly overacting in his roles. He is in a Martin McDonagh film though and with In Bruges and this as indicators he seems to bring the best out of his actors. Harrelson tones down his problematic tendencies here, and gives a more restrained performance that usual which is rather funny considering he plays a psychotic gangster who is the main villain of the film.

Harrelson here does two things in the role and he does those two things quite well. The first being a properly threatening presence in the film. The scene where he slowly talks to Hans's wife figuring out who she is than eventually killing her is played extremely well by Harrelson. What makes the scene so good is how casual Harrelson is in his portraying the mobster's moment that he figures out who she is. He brings out the brutality of the scene becuase he makes Costello's interrogation to the murder such a natural process. 

The other thing that Harrelson does here is be quite an amusing presence to just the right amount. He never compromises the overarching the intensity of Costello as a vicious killer despite having some very funny moments that comes from just how much this mobster loves his dog. These moments could easily been way over played to the point of silliness yet Harrelson gives so much conviction to them. He makes the concern of this killer for his little dog entirely genuine that is actually a little sweet while being absolutely hilarious at the very same time.

Harrelson through the film makes just the perfect oddity that is Charlie Costello. He makes him convincing as just a pure killer, and because of that he gets so much humor from his role. My particular favorite moment of his performance is when comes to get his dog from Billy, and comes unarmed and alone just like Billy said. His expression when Billy just randomly shoots him in the back despite the fact he is fully complying made me burst out laughing. Harrelson is so good here becuase for the most part he could be a gangster in a serious film, and it is much funnier when that sort of gangster does the stupid things Charlie does.

This is a fantastic performance by Harrelson where he uses his considerable talent without ever going over board despite the strange dynamic that exists within his character here. He realizes that dynamic so well through finding just the perfect tone for Charlie. He never forgets to bring the ruthlessness of character in equal measure with the humor of his character. It just incredible the way he, Rockwell, and Walken all are able to share the film together so well. They all have their great individual moments, but they each play off of each other just as well.
Tom Waits did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Zachariah Rigby in Seven Psychopaths.

Tom Waits the musician turned character actor is someone who you expect at least something from one he appears in a film as he has such a unique screen presence which is certianly used to great affect here as Zachariah a psychopath who shows up to be interviewed after answering Billy's call for psychopaths. Waits here is basically a one scene performance as rabbit petting serial killer who spent time of his youth with a young woman going around the country murdering serial killers. Waits doesn't have a lot of time but he makes the most of it.

Waits's part of the story basically acts as a bit of a diversion for the plot, and easily could have seemed like a big waste of time. Waits therefore has quite a challenge to make sure Zachariah's story doesn't seem like a waste of time, and he certianly pulls through. Waits is very much takes a slightly somber dead pan tone as Zachariah that works particularly well in telling a story of such insanity. It is the right approach and again just like his fellow performers in this film he brings a strange combination of weight and humor that feels entirely seamless.

The reason all four of these performances work is that they each take such a differing approaches with each of the actors. None of them try to replicate each other, and Waits's mostly dead pan take is very effective. The way he says he doesn't think he sounded crazy is very amusing, and his telling of the story is certainly quite bizarre something Waits specializes bringing to screen with an absolute ease. He tells the story and makes the story of the two killers surprisingly poignant.

Waits simply adds to the strength of this film with his short little story. Tom Waits is basically a one scene wonder, although his credits sting scene is also a very entertaining moment, and he is as a one scene wonder should be. He holds the film in his command for his brief time, and is properly interesting and intriguing the point that I certainly would not have minded some more of Waits. He takes the time he has, does everything he can with it, and just is another reason why this is a great film.

GAME CHANGE

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

GAME CHANGE
Written by Danny Strong
Directed by Jay Roach
Starring Julianne Moore, Woody Harrelson and Ed Harris

Although I will never fully understand it, I was just another Canadian glued to my television set nightly leading up to the 2008 American presidential election. On the one hand, I was consumed by the idea of the change that then senator, Barack Obama, could bring to a country that so badly needed it, to say nothing of the historical possibility of an African-American president. But I will not deny that I was also deeply fascinated, and often just as disturbed, by the circus that was the John McCain campaign. GAME CHANGE, from the team who previously went behind the political curtain with RECOUNT to explore the 2000 election recounts in Florida, is not going to blow anyone’s mind with revelations about that campaign but it does make the whole insanity seem much more human than it came across.

Unlike the novel of the same name that GAME CHANGE is based on, by authors John Heileman and Mark Halperin, this HBO feature does not focus on the Democratic and Republican primaries. Instead, writer, Danny Strong, and director Jay Roach, introduce the film at a pivotal point in the McCain campaign and take it from there. Senator McCain, played by a reserved Ed Harris, is trailing Obama (not dramatized in the film) by far too many points to win the election and refuses to play dirty politics. So in order to win, his campaign manager (Woody Harrelson) suggests that they need a real game changer to compete with the celebrity status Obama had risen to. And so, McCain’s team heads out in search of a running mate that could somehow eclipse Obama’s star with one that shines even brighter. Unfortunately, their search did not include nearly enough research. Enter Sarah Palin.


And enter Golden Globe winner, Julianne Moore, in what seems like an effortless and yet beautifully layered portrayal of the former Governor of Alaska. While GAME CHANGE does make many a statement about the blunders that went into the rushed decision to bring Palin on to McCain’s ticket, the bigger focus is on Palin’s personal journey. Roach presents Palin as a patriotic woman with only the best of intentions to do right by her country when we first meet her and a bit power crazed by the end. Moore than takes that cue and reminds the viewer that she is also a caring mother, who genuinely connected with a great deal of the American people and who, after realizing she may have bit off more than she could chew, completely retreats from the outside world. Moore makes her human, shows us how scary it must have been for her to go through what she did, coming from where she came from. She isn’t painted as a saint by any means but showing us Sarah’s softer side reminds us that perhaps we too should be showing ours more often than we are now. Who knows? We just might change the game.


248. Seven Psychopaths

Sunday, October 28, 2012

248. (14 Oct) Seven Psychopaths (2012, Martin McDonagh) 75



A more cinematic and ambitious film than his fiendishly delightful In Bruges, Martin McDonagh is quickly becoming the most accomplished comedy filmmaker working today. His self-aware and self-referential scripting skewers Hollywood filmmaking so capably, all the while looking so effortless, it's truly astounding. The graveyard sequence here is the standout; it has more laughs per second than most films have in their entire runtime. Sam Rockwell gives a career best performance while Christopher Walken, Colin Farell and Woody Harrelson are almost as excellent.

RAMPART

Sunday, May 13, 2012


RAMPART
Written by James Ellroy and Oren Moverman
Directed by Oren Moverman
Starring Woody Harrelson, Ned Beatty and Ben Foster


Dave Brown: Bear in mined, I’m not a racist. Fact is, I hate all people equally.

There is only one reason RAMPART, Oren Moverman’s second directorial effort works as well as it does and that is Woody Harrelson. As a corrupt cop whose 24 years of questionable service in the Los Angeles Police Department are finally catching up with him and we are there to witness him spiral out of control. The beauty of Harrelson’s performance is that his particular fall from grace is executed with nothing but the most brilliant of technical control.

Moverman’s first film as a feature director is THE MESSENGER, another film that features a powerhouse performance by Harrelson. Moverman even received an Academy Award nomination for his work on the screenplay. With RAMPART though, he seems to have lost some of the confidence one would have expected would have just grown exponentially from his first success. His work with the actors continues to shine (including bleak but brave performances from Ben Foster and Robin Wright) but his visual approach here is amateurish. You can feel the constant need to be edgy or try new things, which only serves to take us out of the moment instead of draw us in deeper. Still, Harrelson is there to anchor everything.



RAMPART also boasts a screenwriting credit from L.A. crime writing expert, James Ellroy. His work with Moverman here is at times a bit ambitious in terms of the unwieldy web they try to weave but the character of Dave Brown himself is the best of their collaboration. As the audience, we are privy to so many of his darker moments and Harrelson, whom we know can lose his temper without notice in the part, exhibits so much restraint and internal struggle that by the time some of his walls begin to crumble, we can feel both the weight of the pain and the relief of the release. The film may not stay with you but the performance will.

108. The Hunger Games

Monday, May 7, 2012

108. (12 May) The Hunger Games (2012, Gary Ross)* 58

The Hunger Games

Monday, April 9, 2012

The Hunger Games, 2012
Directed by Gary Ross

By now I'm sure you're all familiar with what 'The Hunger Games' is all about. I'll break it down briefly for those who don't know. In the ruins of North America, now named Panem, there are 12 districts, each living in poverty and oppressed by the Capitol, a spoiled city. And to reaffirm their control, they hold, annually, something called the Hunger Games, where a one boy and one girl from each district, between the ages of 12 and 18 must fight to the death in an arena, until only one stands. The winner is awarded fame, wealth, and safety. Katniss Everdeen lives in District 12. When her little sister is plucked from the bowl of names to be a tribute, Katniss volunteers in her place. A boy her age named Peeta is also selected, in which she has ties to. And the Hunger Games begin.

I know, this review is a couple weeks late. I had originally planned to see it the Saturday after it opened, with a bunch of friends. We'd pre-ordered tickets and everything, but I got the stomach flu the morning of, and just haven't had time to see it since. Finally, 2 weeks later, I've seen in! I picked up the first book after the urging of my friend around a year ago, during the very early stages of casting. The books weren't a huge deal yet, but it was picking up steam. I read them all pretty quick, and while I wasn't awestruck with the books, they were good reads with a strong message, and knew they would translate to screen a lot better than most things.

 First, let me just say all the performances, I thought, were pretty spot on. A lot of people had reservations about Jennifer Lawrence being too sexy, and Josh Hutcherson being too young, or just not what they'd imagined at all. But getting Jennifer Lawrence on as Katniss was a really great move. She's an Oscar nominated actress, and this role is quite similar in nature to Ree, the character she played in Winter's Bone, in which she was nominated. She really embodied Katniss in every way and gave such a real and gritty performance. She had Katniss's strength, but was also able to embody her vulnerability in a real way, and was able to find the balance between that and her strength and stubbornness, which, I'd imagine, is quite tricky. Jenn is a really diverse actress. She had a small but cute role in last year's Like Crazy, she played the sexy and mysterious Raven/Mystique in X-Men: First Class, and debuted in Winter's Bone. Jenn has such promise to be a really great actress, and she doesn't take it easy in this role. She pours a lot of emotion into her character, and draws back enough when needed to draw back. She gives Katniss strength and a ruthlessness. But you can still remember she's just a teenage girl, who has a family to look after. She's not the tough person she appears to be, and Jenn really captures this all.

The supporting cast was great too. Josh Hutcherson was great as Peeta. What I really appreciated about his performance was the subtleties he brought to Peeta. The smiles, and the stolen glances, that you knew he bought every word Katniss said, and that he's really in love with her, and it's not a game to him. He was able to make me feel for his character in a way I hadn't in the book. He made me realize what a tragic character Peeta is, constantly getting the rotten end of the stick. Having an undying and loyal love for Katniss, and not realizing until he's head over heels that it was just a game for her. While he didn't give a heart-stopping performance, he did give a nuanced one, and was quite good if you were really paying attention.

Such as this moment here. Just the way he looks at her, and he just loves her, you can tell. Just the one little glance (and tons more in this scene and throughout the film) sold me. And his reaction to being picked to the Games was great too. Just mouth half-open, hardly believing, and in shock, and even crying. I feel like this is an unpopular opinion since I keep reading people thought his performance was mediocre, but I felt like he really understood his character. It wasn't perfect, nor was it the best in the movie, but he really captured who Peeta is and what he's about. For that I applaud him.


 There are plenty of fun performances by various well known actors. Woody Harrelson and Stanley Tucci gave my favourite supporting performances in the film. Harrelson as the drunken, harsh mentor of the 2 District 12 tributes gave a great performance. He was funny, he was a jerk, and then you saw the side of him where he really cared. And Stanley Tucci, you could tell he was really having fun with his part. The faces he made, his laughter, just the way he carried himself, it was such a fun performance to watch. Other fun supporting actors included Elizabeth Banks as the cooky and colourful Effie, Donald Sutherland as President Snow, Wes Bentley as Seneca Crane and Toby Jones as Claudius Templesmith.

The pacing of the movie, I found, to be balanced quite well. I had wondered how long they would spend on the preparations before the Games. The training and all that. I felt they kept in a good amount. It was long enough that you got the picture, and got enough information about the tributes, and about Haymitch and Peeta, that you needed to know before the Games. It was a good chunk, but it never overstayed its welcome. It was a large chunk in the book, and was a large chunk in the film. It showed off just how much of an event this was to the Capitol, and showed how grotesque it really is, when you think about it, showing the balance between the showing off of the tributes and the dressing up, and the training. The Games were also well paced, though Katniss's time with Rue was very short and could've been extended for a fuller effect. The violence was definitely there, and we got touches of it, but, to keep it to a PG-13 rating, it was scarce and was shown in generalities only, though there is a lot of blood shown.

Additionally, the costuming and make-up were quite fun. They were outrageous and crazy, and were just so fun and playful. I wouldn't be surprised to see this film get either a make-up or a costume nod. Both were well done and were great.

One frequent complaint that I've read is the excessive use of "shaky cam". For the most part, I felt it was well-used. During fight scenes, understandable. Running through the woods, understandable. However, it was used way too much during the first half hour or so, I felt like I was watching the Hurt Locker. But it felt extremely misplaced when in the Capitol and on the train. I felt like I never got a very good look at anyone for the first little bit since it was zoomed awkwardly in some places, and was all very close shots, and hardly any wider shots for the first little while. Use of shaky cam should've been reserved for the Games, and it didn't have much business in the first half of the film, as it took away from the film more than it added to it. Additionally, some of the Visual Effects weren't that great. When Katniss and Peeta was on fire at the tribute parade, I actually chuckled out loud upon seeing. It looked incredibly fake, and phony. I realize they didn't have an enormous budget and it was saved for other things, but this looked pretty bad. Though I forgive them because most of the other things looked quite good.

There were many "added" in things as well, though all were incredibly beneficial to the film. The scenes between Seneca Crane and President Snow, the rebellion in District 11, the television discussion with Caesar Flickerman and Claudius Templesmith, etc. Even seeing more of Haymitch, and what kind of role he played in different things added more to the film that the book wasn't able to with a first person perspective.  We get to see the part Haymitch plays behind-the-scenes, and showing him sucking up his anti-socialism, and interacting with the sponsors in order to help Katniss, and just how much he really cares for her, and for Peeta. In a way, I felt the movie portrayed the overall themes and thoughts of the characters better than the book did, because it was less limited to Katniss's view.

Overall, this is one of the better blockbuster films, based on a YA novel no less, that has come out. With an 85% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, this film has done well for itself. Not to mention it had the biggest opening weekend, ever, for a non-sequel and has made a ton of money. This film has a wide appeal for both boys and girls, and it's great to see something the guys can get into as well, after having all-girls things like Twilight.
It's a fun movie, with some violence, some romance, and some fun costumes. It's a great movie, and a really well done adaptation.

8.5/10

086. Game Change

Sunday, March 11, 2012

086. (11 Mar) Game Change (2012, Jay Roach) 60



Decidedly not as good their Recount, Jay Roach and Danny Strong's reteaming still has its moments. They present behind the scenes moments of the McCain-Palin campaign here that are downright irresistible, namely whenever there's a major confrontation. Julianne Moore pretty much locks down an Emmy win as Palin, convincingly inhabiting the role with a degree of comfort that's astounding considering how prolific the former governor remains. Her major blowouts with Woody Harrelson and a scene-stealing Sarah Paulson are high points.

Editing is the biggest issue here. The film feels in no way fluid, transitioning roughly from one phase of the campaign to the next. The scenes here don't offer an encapsulation of the entire McCain-Palin drama.

Ed Harris is also a liability. His John McCain is physically unconvincing, but the character's also peripheral to a point he barely serves a purpose. Harris also doesn't present McCain's coldness or awkwardness. It's apt though that, like how Palin stole McCain's thunder, Moore easily overtakes Harris.

Best Supporting Actor 2009: Results

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

5. Christopher Plummer in The Last Station- Plummer although certainly competent never manages to make anything special out of Tolstoy.
4. Stanley Tucci in The Lovely Bones- Tucci mostly just tries to be creepy which he does do well enough. His performance though lacks the visceral power a performance like this should have.
3. Matt Damon in Invictus- This might seem like a surprise position but out of the bottom three Damon does succeed the most in his particular role. He brings the passion and spirit that the story needs.
2. Woody Harrelson in The Messenger- Harrlson gives an intense and powerful emotional performance when he is in uniform, but when out of it he relies  a little bit too much on his usual style.
1. Christoph Waltz in Inglourious Basterds- Waltz simply gives a great memorable villainous performance that manages to be both humorous and chilling, and succeeds with every single challenge found in the role.
Deserving Performances:
Michael Fassbender in Inglourious Basterds

Best Supporting Actor 2009: Woody Harrelson in The Messenger

Monday, December 5, 2011

Woody Harrelson received his second Oscar nomination for portraying Captain Tony Stone in The Messenger.

The Messenger follows a casualty notification officer and wounded veteran Staff Sgt. Will Montgomery (Ben Foster).

Woody Harrelson portrays Captain Tony Stone is Will's superior who mentors and works with Will as a casualty notification officer. Harrelson is not one of my favorite actors as he tends to needlessly overact in many of his performances. Luckily this is not the case in this performance, for the most part. Harrelson gives a  very intense performance early on as he sets up for the ground rules on how to inform the death of soldiers to their next of kin.

Harrelson is very strong in these early scenes setting up the mood for the film. It is interesting the way he plays Stone's form of conviction in these moments. Harrelson shows that Stone very much understands the importance of his job, and that it must be done right. He shows no humor in these moments being direct and to the point about the whole affair, because in this particular part of life Stone is absolutely will take it with absolute seriousness.

Harrelson manages to show that Stone knows his sense of duty and performs it with the utmost responsibility of a true soldier. Harrelson is truly effective though because of his ability to show that Stone has been at this difficult duty for too long of a time. It is not that it still does not effect him it does as it should, but Harrelson always presents a certain knowledge in Tony that establishes his long history performing his duty.

The best scenes in the film, and the some of the best moments in Harrelson's performance are in the casualty notification scenes. Harrelson and Ben Foster actually say very little in these rather difficult to watch scenes, other than the actual notifications. Harrelson is very good and his reactions are work in perfect contrast to Foster's. Harrelson and Foster are both very effective and only add to the emotional impact of these scenes through their pitch perfect reactions. They both show the soldiers attempting trying the hardest to contain their emotions, but that it is a terrible struggle to do so.

Unfortunately Harrelson is less impressive as the unofficial Tony who acts quite differently when not in uniform perhaps a little too differently. Harrelson starts to do a little too much of his Harrelson routine although not to the extent that it seems like overacting, which he can do in some of his performances, but it does not exactly fit with the Tony Stone seen earlier in the film. Yes it makes sense for Stone to be quite different when not on duty, but Harrelson unfortunately does a little too much of his usual Harrelson thing some of the time, although not all of the time preventing it from being too distracting.

I do believe though Harrelson could have toned down more of some of his mannerisms he usually finds in these scenes and it would have helped his performance be more effective on a whole. Instead most of his scenes are just him doing his old Harrelson thing although certainly toned down most of the time. Except of course for his Oscar scene where he listens Will's description of his war time experiences. Tony breaks down in this scene, and Harrelson did not really completely earn his reaction unfortunately and his whole performance really fails to make the impact it should in the scene. His failings are almost made up by the other half of his performance which does allow this to be a powerful performance, although not a perfect one.

Best Supporting Actor 2009

Friday, December 2, 2011

And the Nominees Were:

Woody Harrelson in The Messenger 

Matt Damon in Invictus

Christoph Waltz in Inglorious Basterds

Christopher Plummer in The Last Station

Stanley Tucci in The Lovely Bones

456. Rampart

Sunday, November 6, 2011

456. (05 Nov) Rampart (2011, Oren Moverman)* 36



Moverman's The Messenger had moments of promise, but this is just dreadful. He's rapidly devolving as a director and writer, letting every little quirk get the better of him. There are ridiculous subplots, like one involving Harrelson's ex-wives, that derail the film for long stretches of time. There are countless throwaway scenes and Moverman's style is outright bad in many places. There's occasionally a solid scene, like one where Sigourney Weaver calls Harrelson's character out. But such moments are few. Harrelson's Oscar buzz is unnecessary.
 

Blogger news

Blogroll

Most Reading