Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Anna May Wong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anna May Wong. Show all posts

Daughter of the Dragon

Tuesday, September 23, 2008


Before he was Charlie Chan, Warner Oland essayed the role of Fu Manchu in three movies from Paramount Studios in the early talkie days: “The Mysterious Dr. Fu Manchu” (1929), “The Revenge of Fu Manchu” (1930) and “Daughter of the Dragon” (1931). (Oland also played Fu Manchu in a skit in “Paramount on Parade” (1930), a film I’d love to see someday).

I had never seen any of these until last night, when I pulled out a tape of “Daughter of the Dragon”, which TCM ran several months ago as part of their examination of Asian portrayals in cinema.

It was a lot of fun. It’s deliriously pulpy in a way that so many early 1930s movies can be. Unfortunately, Oland’s Fu Manchu checks out early, about the 20-minute mark, leaving daughter Ling Moy (Anna May Wong) to carry out his vengeance against the Petrie family. Fu Manchu holds Dr. Petrie (Holmes Herbert) responsible for the death of his family, and is going to return the favor with Petrie’s son (Bramwell Fletcher).

In the series of Fu Manchu novels by Sax Rohmer, Fu Manchu’s opponents were the imitation Holmes and Watson characters of Sir Nayland Smith and his assistant Dr. Petrie. Nayland Smith makes no appearance in “Daughter of the Dragon”, which is disappointing to followers of the books. In fact, it’s been years since I read “Daughter of Fu Manchu” but nothing in “Daughter of the Dragon” looked familiar to me so I suspect that, like the much more elaborate “Mask of Fu Manchu” produced by M-G-M a year later, only the title of the book survived.

“Daughter of the Dragon” is eminently watchable for its 70-minute running time, but it really kicks into high gear during the last 20 minutes, what with kidnappings, poisonings, secret passageways, dramatic last minute rescues and a (potential) eye torture scene that had me squirming.

I would like to see Oland’s other Fu Manchu performances. He’s OK here, but not the gloriously evil Fu Manchu I remember from the books. Here he’s too easily dispatched; the Fu Manchu of the books is more of a mysterious, unstoppable presence. I also prefer my Fu Manchu creating elaborate plans to take over the world, rather than a mere revenge story told here.

Interestingly enough, the hero of the film is not whiny Bramwell Fletcher, but a Scotland Yard detective played by the Japanese actor Sessue Hayakawa. He becomes immediately smitten with Ling Moy – who wouldn’t? – but doesn’t forget that she is carrying on her father’s wishes. Their final scene is quite poignant and moving, and a good reminder that the more these Pre-Code gems are unearthed, the more we see that Hollywood did allow minorities to play roles beyond the stereotypical servant. Not often of course, but enough to say that not ALL Hollywood movies dealt in stereotypes.

For fans of Universal horror films, we get Bramwell Fletcher, unforgettable in his opening mad scene in “The Mummy.” (1932). His Petrie Jr. is stunningly ineffectual; it’s a good thing Hayakawa is around to take care of Ling Moy, because Petrie isn’t up to the task. Petrie’s romantic interest, before Ling Moy enters the picture, is played by Frances Dade, who played Lucy to Lugosi’s Dracula the previous year.

Rumors abound that TCM is negotiating with Universal, holder of the rights of the pre-1948 Paramount library, to show more early 1930s Paramount titles. I hope so, and I hope that package includes the earlier Fu Manchu movies. I bet they’d be fascinating to see.

Rating for “Daughter of the Dragon”: Two and a half stars.

The Thief of Bagdad (1924)

Thursday, October 18, 2007

“The Thief of Bagdad” (1924) is one of the most lavish silent movies ever made, thanks to the wondrous production design of William Cameron Menzies (“Gone with the Wind”, “King’s Row”). The oversize sets are a wonder to behold and the special effects are quite charming. In fact the flying carpet sequences are still quite effective.

The main flaw in the film is it takes forever to get going. It runs two and a half hours and the first hour appears to me devoid of much drama. Like Faribanks’ earlier “Robin Hood” (1922) it takes a while to get going, but once it does the entertainment level kicks in big time.

Douglas Fairbanks plays the title character who falls in love with a princess (Julanne Johnston). She falls in love with him too, but he is a mere commoner, and a thief to boot. To win her love, he must embark on a series of challenges to win her hand. These adventures include fighting a dragon, battling a large bat-like creature, tangling with a large underwater creature while being tempted by sirens, stealing a gem from the eyes of a giant statue, etc.

While Doug is away, a Mongol suitor (the Japanese actor Sojin) attempts to take over Bagdad with the aide of the Princess’ hand maiden, played by a young and stunningly beautiful Anna May Wong.

The second half of the movie flies by and offers a never-ending parade of wondrous sights. I can imagine 1924 audiences must have been bowled over by the sheer spectacle on display, and I can see why it was such a huge hit.

Fairbanks is as dynamic as ever, and his enthusiasm shines through 80 years later. Johnston is adequate in her role but rather colorless. It’s too bad Wong couldn’t have essayed the role. She would have brought much more fire to it.

Sojin makes a good villain and I was interested to see him, as he played Charlie Chan in the silent “The Chinese Parrott.” (1927). This film is unfortunately lost, and it’s a shame as I would think it would be a real treat to see. It was directed by Paul Leni, a master stylist who directed “The Cat and the Canary” (1927) and “The Man Who Laughs” (1928), two films that rank among the most stylish silent films I’ve ever seen. I would love to see what he did with “The Chinese Parrott.”

The score on the Kino DVD is based on the original 1924 cue sheets and contains original themes as well as familiar themes based on Rimsky-Korsakov and Ippolitov-Ivanov compositions..

The “Thief of Bagdad” has been remade several times most notably in 1940 with Sabu, a version which remains one of the most jaw-droppingly gorgeous color films ever made. The Miklos Rozsa score for the 1940 version is one of the greatest pieces of symphonic music written in the 20th century. And no, I’m not exaggerating.

Rating for the 1924 “The Thief of Bagdad”: Three stars.
 

Blogger news

Blogroll

Most Reading