Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label 2003 Alternate Supporting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2003 Alternate Supporting. Show all posts

Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2003: Results

Monday, December 3, 2012

5. Albert Finney in Big Fish- Finney gives a fairly simplistic performance, but appropriately so. He fills his role with the right charm and warmth necessary.
4. Peter Sarsgaard in Shattered Glass-Sarsgaard gives an understated and effective performance in his depiction of a editor who slowly sees his popular writer for the liar he is.
3. Paul Bettany in Master and Commander-Bettany another good understated performance this year as a quiet source of reason and warmth on a war ship.
2. Sean Astin- The Return of The King- Astin capitalizes on his work from the previous film fully realizes his character with a powerful passion.
1. Kevin Bacon in Mystic River- This was the battle of the subtle, and understated really. I must say that this is most certainly a toss up, really I hate to put Sargaard fourth but I don't really feel him as fourth. I really liked all four equally and I basically just had to pick one. Bacon is my choice at the moment giving a moving performance, that is again very understated, that finds a way to give the best performance of his film.
Overall Rank:
  1. Kevin Bacon in Mystic River
  2. Sean Astin in The Return of the King
  3. Paul Bettany in Master and Commander
  4. Peter Sarsgaard in Shattered Glass
  5. Ian McKellen in The Return of the King
  6. Viggo Mortensen in The Return of the King
  7. Albert Finney in Big Fish
  8. Elijah Wood in The Return of the King
  9. James Caan in Dogville
  10. Yoo Ji-Tae in Oldboy
  11. Laurence Fishburne in Mystic River
  12. Tim Robbins in Mystic River
  13. Brian Cox in X2
  14. Chris Cooper in Seabiscuit
  15. Stellan Skarsgaard in Dogville
  16. Geoffrey Rush in The Curse of the Black Pearl
  17. Sonny Chiba in Kill Bill Vol 1
  18. Bernard Hill in The Return of the King
  19. Sam Rockwell in Matchstick Men
  20. Bobby Cannavale in The Station Agent
  21. Jeff Daniels in Gods and Generals
  22. Ben Gazzara in Dogville
  23. Kevin Conway in Gods and Generals
  24. Brendan Gleeson in Cold Mountain
  25. Christopher Lee in The Return of the King
  26. Andy Serkis in The Return of the King
  27. Michael Parks in Kill Bill Vol. 1
  28. Bill Nighy in Love Actually
  29. Jeff Bridges in Seabiscuit
  30. John Noble in The Return of the King
  31. Cillian Murphy in Cold Mountain
  32. Gene Hackman in Runaway Jury
  33. Ken Watanabe in The Last Samurai
  34. Liam Neeson in Love Actually
  35. Ian McKellen in X2
  36. William H. Macy in Seabiscuit
  37. Dustin Hoffman in Runaway Jury
  38. Billy Boyd in Return of the King
  39. Tom Guiry in Mystic River
  40. Michael Caine in Secondhand Lions
  41. Hank Azaria in Shattered Glass
  42. Judah Friedlander in American Splendor
  43. David Wenham in The Return of the King 
  44. Billy Crudup in Big Fish 
  45. Robert Duvall in Gods and Generals
  46. Philip Seymour Hoffman in Cold Mountain 
  47. Alan Cumming in X2
  48. Alan Rickman in Love Actually 
  49. Steve Buscemi in Big Fish
  50. James D'Arcy in Master and Commander
  51. John Rhys Davies in The Return of the King 
  52. Alec Baldwin in The Cooler
  53. Hugh Grant in Love Actually
  54. Patrick Stewart in X2
  55. Colin Firth in Love Actually
  56. Danny DeVito in Big Fish
  57. Hugo Weaving in The Return of the King
  58. Bruce McGill in Matchstick Men
  59. Orlando Bloom in The Return of the King
  60. Dominic Monaghan in The Return of the King
  61. Djimon Honsou in In America
  62. Ron Eldard in House of Sand and Fog
Next Year: 1984 Supporting 

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2003: Albert Finney in Big Fish

    Albert Finney did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Bafta and a golden globe, for portraying the older Edward Bloom in Big Fish.

    Big Fish is an enjoyable, as Tim Burton seems to try much harder here than usual, about a dying man who tells tall tales about his life, while his son fails to comprehend his father as the son believes all the stories are made up.

    Albert Finney portrays the older man telling his stories constantly to anyone who can, and trying to jump on the chance to tell a story if it seems like a good time to even if the people he is telling it to have already heard of the story. No matter what the situation Finney is very consistent in his depiction of Edward's attitude in regards to other people's reactions to his stories, which really is the point of indifference. It is not that he does not care exactly how people feel about him, but rather Finney shows that no matter what Edward enjoys telling his stories.

    Finney is nicely charming in his role being just a nice old man, who gives off a great deal warmth to all around him. Even as his son consistently and somewhat angrily confronts him about his stories, Finney shows Edward to be resilient. Whatever anyone says about his stories or he himself Finney wonderfully conveys the genuine joy that always prevails in Edward. Finney properly reflects the joyous life of his character by simply portraying Edward as man whose happiness never ceases for a moment despite even when there is opposition against him.

    One could try to argue I suppose that Finney should have put more mystery into his performance to fuel the son's doubts, but really that is not needed since the movie depicts the tales there is no reason Edward should not fully believe them himself. Finney takes the right approach with his performance by being just a constant source of constant merriment. There is properly no grey area with Finney's older Edward he is a man who has enjoyed his life, and does not mind telling people why he has enjoyed it the way he has.

    This is not an excessively complex performance by Albert Finney by any means but he really does handle his role just as he should. He is just as the character should be which is a sweet old man. He is enjoyable to watch and listen to throughout the film. Finney really is an actor who frankly was not allowed enough of his Tom Jones like performances, as he does have a great deal of natural charm that usually is not something required of him in his roles. Here though Finney uses it wonderfully well in creating his character.

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2003: Paul Bettany in Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World

    Saturday, December 1, 2012

    Paul Bettany did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for Bafta, for portraying Dr. Stephen Maturin in Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World.

    Master and Commander is quite an entertaining film about a British Captain Jack Aubrey (Russell Crowe) who pushes his ship and crew to take down a French vessel during the Napoleonic Wars.

    Paul Bettany portrays the ship's hard working doctor who is also the loyal friend and confidant of the Captain. As the Captain is far more of a passionate and romantic sort who pushes everyone to get the task at done. Crowe does this all very well, but what makes his performance really work is from the support of Bettany who acts as almost someone there just to bring the Captain down a bit. Bettany rightly does not portray the doctor in any way cynical but rather just a very down to earth man who is always very aware of what his job requires him to do.

    Bettany finds just the right tone for the doctor to create the right dynamic with Crowe's Captain. Both show just the right warmth and kinship with one another, but they are not overbearing of it. In fact the two have such great chemistry here by simply playing that their friendship is pretty much just a given, it is not something that they even need to discuss. The two are both excellent in portraying the two have an easy understanding of each other, and they do this incredibly well because of how effortlessly the two create the relationship together.

    In the first half of the film Bettany is very reserved in the film mostly going about the duties required of him. Bettany does this very well though as he shows the doctor as quiet but warming man. Bettany is particularly good in his scene where must amputee the forearm of one of the very young crew members. Bettany conveys well the reassurance the doctor is able to give the young boy, as he portrays the doctor as a man who has a genuinely good heart. Bettany is very good because he succeeds in creating the stress the doctor does suffer from his job, but still has the same reassurance.

    The doctor's role drifts from being supportive as their mission seem far less likely of success despite the Captain's views to the contrary. The doctor frankly does his best to slam the Captain's thought of getting the ship no matter what, while the doctor seems the crew being discontented as well as his own personal regrets by not being to do research on the Galapagos island. Bettany is very strong in these scenes because he does not portray the doctor's anger in any sort of hatred toward the Captain, but rather an earned frustrations he feels over the Captain's selfish behavior. Bettany is able to portray properly that it is of Maturin's very real concerns for the crew, and his friend that propels his passionate disagreement with the Captain. 

    Bettany serves the needs of his part splendidly. It is one that is very supportive and he works the function brilliantly. When he needs to stand out on his own though he brings a power to the part very nicely as well. He particularly finds the inner strength of his character well. Bettany even succeeds in making the scene in which the doctor operates on himself after he has been accidentally shot. The scene very well could be one that would be hard to believe but Bettany stays absolutely convincing in the scene. This is a very strong performance by Paul Bettany as he just fulfills his role, again like the other three I have reviewed this year, with a subtle and very assured approach.

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2003: Kevin Bacon in Mystic River

    Friday, November 30, 2012

    Kevin Bacon did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Detective Sean Devine in Mystic River.

    It is probably not surprising that Bacon received no attention for this performance, as firstly Bacon is an actor the academy just seems not to notice even when they notice the films he is in. More importantly though Bacon despite portraying one the main characters in the film. Bacon though does not "ACT" nearly as much as the two Oscar winning performances from the film given by Sean Penn and Tim Robbins. Bacon never has a scene like Robbins's vampire scene, or Penn's "My Daughter!" scene, which most certainly is not a bad thing but restrained performances are not favored by the academy.

    Bacon takes an understated method through his entire performance. Even his Boston accent, which is present, is very much downplayed, but frankly is far more natural than it is rest of the actors. Bacon due to the fact he really does not get that many personal scenes, has to create his character as Sean and his partner (Laurence Fishburne) investigate the murder of Jimmy Markum's (Penn) daughter. Bacon has a few moments to himself mostly being when Sean is called by his wife over the phone, a subplot that frankly could have been dropped as the payoff does not work all that well due to the actress playing his wife, but for the most part Bacon is forced to find his character while moving along with the plot at a rapid pace.

    Bacon is quite effective in portraying Sean in this way actually as he tries to find the killer while trying to keep his personal feelings behind him despite being childhood friends with both Jimmy, and Dave (Robbins) who slowly becomes a suspect. Bacon underplays the role and fittingly for the character. He shows that Sean very much has a job to do, and is quite intent and doing it. Nevertheless Bacon conveys well the personal connections Sean does feel due to his attachment to the case. He is always very collected, but through subtle reactions he portrays the way the events due effect Sean, Bacon's very small response to seeing the murder victim is Jimmy's Daughter is particularly well handled.

    Throughout the film Bacon is steadfast in his portrayal that Sean is a good a detective. He believably portrays Sean as a confidant officer with an underlying passion to solve the case, and even with his personal connections he will still do his very best to find the killer. The doubt and hesitations though are equally well placed by Bacon as Sean does struggle to wave his personal thoughts with the case when some evidence points that Dave may be the killer. Bacon again keeps his performance very much contained in terms of the emotions shown, but he still powerfully brings the struggle in Sean to life. It is not something that overwhelms, but Bacon more realistically shows it to be something that presses on in the back of his mind less at some points, but heavier when he is faced more directly with his past.

    This is strong work from Bacon as he still does show that even Sean has never forgotten watching Dave being taken away by pedophiles when they were kids. He is not at all overt in his depiction of this very much again establishing it as something that very much sits within Sean, it is not always on his mind, but Bacon shows that he can't ever forget it either. Bacon is great in this role because he stays so calm in the part, and stays as someone you can more easily follow along than Penn with his screaming. Bacon is the one who keeps the film grounded with his far more down to earth portrayal of Sean. Bacon despite being very much put behind the other actors in terms of the types of scenes he is given, he actually gives my favorite performance in the film by taking this fair less flamboyant approach to a story that never calls for it.

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2003: Sean Astin in The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

    Wednesday, November 28, 2012

    Sean Astin did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Samwise "Sam" Gamgee in The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.

    The Return of the King is the third film of the Lord of the Rings telling the story among many of when the hobbit Frodo (Elijah Wood) finally gets into Mordor and onto Mount Doom to destroy the Ring.

    Sean Astin portrays Frodo's fellow Hobbit and best friend who has been with him along his whole long journey to destroying the ring. In the other two films Astin offered fine support as Sam who always act loyal to Frodo being the only member of the original fellowship to go with him to actually attempt to destroy the ring. Astin is good in both he previous films, and does have some very nice moments but it is not until this film where he really gets to fully shine in the part of Samwise.

    In the role throughout all of the films but especially this one, where one could argue that Sam becomes the true hero of the entire film, is the perpetual optimism of Sam. Astin portrays this particularly well because unlike say the Ralph Bakshi where Sam just comes off as stupid, Astin shows it as something entirely genuine within Sam to simply try to see the brighter side of things even in the darkest of situation. Astin does overplay it any way only portraying Sam's strong beliefs in good triumphing over evil in a honest fashion that is perfect for Sam. 

    What is perhaps the most important aspect of Sam in the series is his friendship with Frodo. Astin and Wood depict it in a very quiet and understated fashion that work wonderfully well. Importantly though Astin shows his love for his friend as something that endures all the pains of the adventure, and that is really what keeps him still trying his best to remain positive even as Frodo becomes slowly more and more depressed over their hardships. Astin makes their key moments together quite moving though because he just is so truthful in finding the unending passion within Sam to help his friend.

    Sam being the first film as rather afraid and unsure of himself so much that he hesitates to leave his home. In this film he goes all the way to taking on a giant spider all by himself. That is certainly not an easy transition to make believable, but Astin does just that. It is a well handled transition slowly through the film, but it is not that Sam necessarily becomes a different person, Astin certainly does not play it that way nor should he. Astin rather more effectively portrays a bravery that simply was always in Sam, and simply the situations is what broke him out of the hesitations he had beforehand.

    One thing that certainly works in favor of the films is the down to earth performances given by much of the cast despite the fact that it is a fantasy film. This is especially true of Astin whose reactions to the situations he goes through, as well as his slow physical and mental trauma from the events, as the reactions of any man, not even necessarily a hobbit. Astin just has the utmost conviction in his part to make every moment especially the most poignant ones, such as "I can carry you", come through with the power they need for the film. This is a strong performance from Astin that finds just the right tone for his character, and powerfully carries it through the film.

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2003: Peter Sarsgaard in Shattered Glass

    Tuesday, November 27, 2012

    Peter Sarsgaard did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for and winning several critical awards, for portraying Charles Lane in Shattered Glass.

    Shattered Glass is an effective film about a journalist Stephen Glass (Hayden Christensen) who seems to have made up most of his stories.

    Peter Sarsgaard portrays at first just another one of the writers at the The New Republic the publication that Glass writes for. Sarsgaard does not do too much in these early scene other than establish well that Lane is not impressed or entertained as much by Stephen as the rest of the staff seems to be. Sarsgaard is good because he does not show Lane to be openly hostile toward Stephen or anything, but rather just makes it clear that he is not impressed by the very popular Glass. Sarsgaard handles this properly by suggesting an opposition to the man, while certainly not being antagonistic either. 

    Lane quickly is chosen to be the new editor of the magazine though after the older editor had a falling out with the owner of the magazine. Sarsgaard is good in the brief scene showing Lane considering taking the position. It is realistically portrayed by Sarsgaard in a wholly non flashy fashion. He shows most certainly an interest in the position, but does well in portraying the hesitations of Lane knowing well that the staff will not take too much of a liking to the decision since the previous editor was well liked. Sarsgaard's performance here early on is understated, but well placed setting up Lane's place in the film properly.

    Sargaard becomes far more prominent when the questions regarding the truth behind one of Glass's articles comes up. Sarsgaard is excellent in portraying the way that Lane takes to the accusations towards Glass's reporting. Sarsgaard again stays very understated, and conveys well the fact that Lane tries his best to stay with his duties as editor which is to try and support his writer. Sarsgaard plays the different feelings in Lane effectively portraying both his sense of duty as he calmly tries to reassure Glass, but does well to create an underlying feelings of doubt within Lane.

    The later parts of the film are almost dominated by Sarsgaard as Lane as the likelihood of Glass's story being truthful becomes less and less. Sarsgaard and Christensen have a terrific dynamic in the scenes where Lane investigates Glass's story first hand. Christensen portrays Glass a very much a liar who just tries to avoid looking at anything through constant excuses as well as seeming more and more desperate as he is asked more questions. Sarsgaard portrays Lane as basically the opposite as Lane stays reasonably reserved as he becomes more and more inquisitive and incisive as Glass's story does not add up.

    Sarsgaard is very good as slowly Lane pushes harder on harder on Glass. At first Sarsgaard portrays just the right degree of reservation due to how the other workers view Glass. Slowly though Sarsgaard powerfully shows that Lane cannot hold back any more. His scene where he finally fires Glass confronting him directly is terrifically played by Sarsgaard portraying well the incredible disgust he feels at a main who entirely disregarded even the slightest notion of journalistic integrity. Sarsgaard directly fulfills the role of Charles Lane, who ends up being the moral center of the film, with a strength that slowly grows in a marvelous fashion during the course of the film. 

    Alternate Best Supporting Actor 2003

    Monday, November 26, 2012

    And the Nominees Were Not:

    Sean Astin in The Return of the King

    Paul Bettany in Master and Commander

    Kevin Bacon in Mystic River

    Albert Finney in Big Fish

    Peter Sarsgaard in Shattered Glass
     

    Blogger news

    Blogroll

    Most Reading