Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label 1973 Alternate Best Actor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1973 Alternate Best Actor. Show all posts

Alternate Best Actor 1973: Results

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

5. James Coburn in Pat Garrett and Billy The Kid- Coburn does an excellent job of mixing in the weightier elements of his performance along with just being the bad ass that Pat Garrett should be.
4. Edward Fox in The Day of the Jackal- Fox's performance is a true accomplishment in making such a unique reality driven characterization of the type of character that is often portrayed in the exact opposite fashion.
3. Steve McQueen in Papillon- This tremendous work by McQueen not only puts on display once again McQueen unique screen presence, but here he also is able to show how powerful of an actor he really could be.
2. Martin Sheen in Badlands-This is a great performance by Martin Sheen who goes out on a limb with his portrayal and never stops for a moment in this outstanding performance.
1. Gene Hackman in Scarecrow- This was certainly a difficult year to choose out of the top four, but as well as with the overall. This is just an incredible year for lead performances. Gene Hackman's is my second favorite of the year though through his powerful unique portrayal in his film.
Overall Rank:
  1. Jack Lemmon in Save the Tiger
  2. Gene Hackman in Scarecrow
  3. Martin Sheen in Badlands
  4. Jack Nicholson in The Last Detail
  5. Jason Miller in The Exorcist
  6. Steve McQueen in Papillon
  7. Edward Fox in The Day of the Jackal
  8. James Coburn in Pat Garrett and Billy The Kid
  9. Paul Newman in The Sting
  10. Al Pacino in Scarecrow
  11. Carl Anderson in Jesus Christ Superstar
  12. Harvey Keitel in Mean Streets
  13. Ted Neeley Jesus Christ Superstar
  14. Walter Matthau in Charley Varrick
  15. Kris Kristofferson in Pat Garrett and Billy The Kid
  16. Clint Eastwood in Magnum Force
  17. Dustin Hoffman in Papillon
  18. Al Pacino in Serpico
  19. Michael Moriarty in Bang the Drum Slowly
  20. Charlton Heston in Soylent Green
  21. Robert Redford in The Sting
  22. Timothy Bottoms in The Paper Chase
  23. Roger Moore in Live and Let Die
  24. Richard Benjamin in West World
Next Year: 1973 supporting

Alternate Best Actor 1973: James Coburn in Pat Garrett and Billy The Kid

James Coburn did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Pat Garrett in Pat Garrett and Billy The Kid.

Pat Garrett and Billy The Kid is a fairly effective western about sheriff Pat Garrett tracking down outlaw Billy The Kid. It is not great though as some of the seventies qualities become tiresome after awhile particularly the soundtrack.

James Coburn portrays the Sheriff Pat Garrett who in this film is portrayed as a former outlaw of sorts himself who was friends with Billy the Kid before becoming a sheriff. In that the film treats him as a man troubled with his conscious over becoming a law man as many look at him as a sell out. Coburn is really the perfect actor for this role for many reasons. One being of course that Coburn just fits in a western. He has just the perfect gruff commanding presence that wears the clothes of the period without any sort of visible effort. Another being is his style of performance which in his best roles is a very low key manner that is great in a way to show his emotions within a character who tries to avoid showing anything.

Coburn of course does something here which what only a select group actors can be which is being a badass without even trying. Coburn has such a natural command here that works particularly well for the formidable Garrett. He makes Pat Garrett a self assured man of the west who knows how to stay alive by killing those he comes across on his path to finding Billy The Kid. One scene in particular shows Coburn's skills is one he alone keeps four potentially dangerous men in check. Coburn is excellent in the moment as he has such a cool calm control of the scene without a doubt. He makes Garrett the imposing figure he should be as well as the fact that the Kid will be caught a inevitability in the end.

Coburn has a certain style that really works particularly well for the character of Pat Garrett here who is suppose to be Billy the Kid's friend and is on somewhat casual terms with most of the people he encounters even the ones he ends up shooting. The Coburn style that does this is his somewhat humorous element he is able to bring in this role, despite not really being a humorous role in any way. Coburn though in his very particular grin though is able to bring this certain history of Garrett without all these people he is hunting down. By being almost friendly with them he honestly creates the history of this Garrett which was once as the ally of those he is now hunting.

What Coburn also does so well though is showing the guilt Garrett feels over his sort of betrayal of his old friends. Coburn is excellent at this because he portrays it so well without ever being obvious about it in a single scene. It would be wrong for a character like Pat Garrett to show a lot of overt emotions of regret particularly when his aim is to seem like a formidable foe. Coburn is perfect at doing this because he leaves it as an underlying element within him usually expressed with the utmost subtly by James Coburn in his expression. He does this particularly well in the last scene when he kills the Kid and Coburn powerfully expresses Garrett's regret and shame despite saying nothing in the moment.

This is a very good performance by James Coburn as he portrays Pat Garrett in a very effective fashion. Coburn uses his distinct screen presence perfectly here to emphasize his role. James Coburn as well though succeeds in giving a compelling portrayal of Garrett's underlying emotions throughout the film. He does an excellent job of mixing in the weightier elements of his performance along with just being the badass that Pat Garrett should be as well. There is no disconnect between the two aspects of his characterization and he effectively melds together these facets of Garrett into one single portrayal.

Alternate Best Actor 1973: Edward Fox in The Day of the Jackal

Monday, January 28, 2013

Edward Fox did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying The Jackal in The Day of the Jackal. 

The Day of the Jackal is a very effective thriller about an assassin's preparations to kill French president Charles de Gaulle while the authorities try to track him down to stop him.

Edward Fox portrays the titular assassin who is the villainous lead of the film. One of the reasons The Day of the Jackal is so unique and effective of a thriller is the almost day to day way it shows in how the Jackal goes about his task. Edward Fox contributes this in his performance that takes a decidedly non flamboyant approach in portraying the assassin. Assassins commonly in film are portrayed in sort of a larger than life fashion, which can be fine if it works in context with the film, but Fox interestingly plays the Jackal as a very down to earth man. Fox goes for an intensely realistic performance as the Jackal.

We follow closely the plan of the Jackal as he sets up everything he needs to to be able to proceed with his plan, as well as every little hurdle that comes up due to the efforts of the government. Fox is amazing in his creation of the the Jackal who we know almost nothing of. He makes him a man of few words and few emotions as he goes about his task. In the way he is so matter of fact in his method he shows that this really is not anything special for him he is a career assassin and the casual manner he takes if very effective in showing this. Fox is brilliant in the way he makes something like planning of the killing of a world leader something so casual, but Fox is able to do it in a wholly believable fashion.

Edward Fox is excellent in portraying the far too great intelligence within The Jackal as he moves about doing what he has to do to achieve his goal. It is fascinating the way Fox plays the Jackal as basically a soulless man, but this is not a one note performance because he shows almost everything else is a put upon facade. It is incredible the way Fox portrays the ease in which the Jackal is able to through on one facade to the next. It is amazing the way he so believably switches from accents to even manners like when he pretends to be a world weary soldier. He even shows the Jackal having the ability to click on a charm when necessary that is so effectively used by Fox as it makes just basically a switch for him to becoming  a charming.

Fox is just incredible the way he is able to create this man who has such skills, which he does in such a natural fashion despite it being something that is entirely unnatural technically speaking. There is such an efficiency in the way he portrays the Jackal that makes him an imposing force, and is able to create the dire feeling that he will succeed despite the fact that the person he is planning on killing definitely was not killed. Fox makes The Jackal a man who never seems to stop or hesitate even for a moment as he goes about his plan of action, Fox gets across so well the flow of this man's sinister intelligence that always makes him at least few steps past the government agencies who attempt to capture and stop him.

Something that really is difficult in many thrillers of this sort is that either the villain or the heroes make foolish mistakes along the way. This film though is incredibly good though in showing that both forces are working at the very top of their game. Fox contributes to this greatly with his performance as the Jackal who we never doubt for a second in his abilities. He makes the Jackal the master assassin he should be and honestly succeeds in creating the threat that he should be to make the film work. There never seems to be luck in play here or anything else that is just by chance for the Jackal, he earns all his successes and Fox is brilliant in the way he fully realizes this.

The most chilling moments of his performance though are whenever he clears all facades off his face and just goes about his job in the purest fashion which is killing people. Fox is fantastic the way his face changes to that cold brutality. One scene in particular is especially disturbing where he is acting very casual with a man like a normal person, but a message on the television alerts the man that the Jackal is wanted by the police. The way Fox shows his demeanor change on the dime to the calculated murderer makes the scene especially chilling. Every one of these scenes are particularly effective due to the cold almost lifeless manner he takes when committing murder.

This is a great performance by Edward Fox and he succeeds in his portrayal of the Jackal which could have easily gone wrong so many ways. The Jackal could have easily been over the top in his style that would not have fit the character, or he could have been one note considering the soulless nature of the role. Fox though finds just the right tone for the Jackal making him a compelling character to follow through the film, and manages to make a fascinating depiction of this assassin. Fox's performance is a true accomplishment in making such a unique reality driven characterization of the type of character that is often portrayed in the exact opposite fashion.
(This is just an amazing year for lead performances)

Alternate Best Actor 1973: Martin Sheen in Badlands

Martin Sheen did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Kit Carruthers in Badlands.

Badlands is an excellent film about two lovers who go on a crime spree after one murders the other's father.

Martin Sheen is the murderer Kit who kills the father of Holly (Sissy Spacek). Martin Sheen plays the role as rouge who has quite taken to the idea of being James Dean. This is something even mentioned directly in the film. The idea of the main character in a realistic drama like this playing the character as partially a James Dean imitator is very tricky. Sheen though is absolutely brilliant in this aspect of the performance. He finds just the right way to have the Dean's mannerisms that seem to be natural to the way Kit has made himself to be. Yes, it is an imitation to a certain degree, but still feels effortless as part of Kit as if it was not hard for Kit to identify with Dean to begin with.

One of the main focuses of the film is Holly's view of Kit which is that of an almost pure romantic despite where their romance gets them. Most of what is traded between the two are looks to on anther. They speak to one another of course, but really most of what they say to each other seems to be about simple unsubstantial things. The substantial moments of their relationships are displayed through their silent glances between them which are quite powerfully portrayed by both Spacek and Sheen. Their relationship honestly seems on another level past attraction or anything else, there just seems to be a mutual understanding between the two that is so beautifully portrayed by the actors with such ease.

It really is an astonishing achievement from both actors the way they create this unique relationship between the film that anchors the film along beautifully. Sheen and Spacek honestly could not be better together in creating this bizarre pair that go along the film. As the two move along through the film when they come close to even when they break apart later on in the film the two are able to show their relationship so brilliantly. They never take the easy route in portraying any aspect of their relationship and go for the bombastic route instead they stay so intensely subtle that it incredible how well they allow us to see every aspect of their relationship as it changes. The two create a connection on screen that few other onscreen couples are able to bring to life.

Of course though a big part of what happens in the film is Kit's killing spree that he goes on mercilessly through many places within the United States. Sheen is particularly compelling in these murder scenes without how matter of fact Kit is in his method especially after his first murder. The first murder which is of Holly's father is quick and instinctively. Sheen is subtle in his reaction of knowing he has killed someone, which is not really guilt but some recognition that he probably should not have done it. Sheen though set up here that although Kit shows a certain regret for his actions, but that these regrets are in no way making him think twice about continuing murdering more people along the way.

When he starts killing more people there is not even a semblance of regret and there is an especially disturbing quality in these scenes because of how little weight there is to his shooting. Kit just does it, and Sheen does not show Kit even second guess himself. He does not show sadism either or desperation even in his method he just kind of goes about doing this and Kit keeps his James Dean cool even when murderer unarmed onlookers. Sheen through his performance honestly creates a particular sort of killer in all too believable of fashion. Killing is just something he can do so easily there isn't anything special about what he does, and Sheen creates a chilling portrait of such a killer.

Now what might be the oddest but most fascinating part of his performance though is late in the film after he is caught and he takes a most peculiar way with his captors. He again stays his James Dean self even in these scenes and it is fascinating. He becomes extremely charming in these scenes and is basically a celebrity with his captors. Sheen absolutely pulls this off with such charisma and style while staying entirely realistic in his performance. He makes the killer a man that is easy to like which is quite bizarre but incredibly effective in showing exactly why everyone would seem to take so well to him.

Performances in the films of Terrence Malick sometimes become part of the cinematography, this is one that stands out on his own, more so than even Brad Pitt in The Tree of Life. Sheen gives passionate performance that creates such a particular but compelling character in Kit Carruthers. He doesn't play anything safe about his performance from the James Dean influence in his character, to the almost silent creation of the central relationship with Sissy Spacek. Every risk he takes with this performance pays up to make this a very memorable chilling characterization of this killer. This is a great performance by Martin Sheen who goes out on a limb with his portrayal and never stops for a moment in this outstanding performance.

Alternate Best Actor 1973: Steve McQueen in Papillon

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Steve McQueen did not receive an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for a Golden Globe, for portraying Henri 'Papillon' Charriere in Papillon.

Papillon is an effective film, if somewhat overlong, about a man attempting to escape from the infamous prison Devil's Island. 

Steve McQueen is an actor known for his screen presence that makes him well the King of Cool for a reason. McQueen certainly has many examples of getting through a film very well through simply through his coolness. Papillon though is most certainly a very different story for McQueen who probably gives his most character driven performance here as Papillon a small time crook who is wrongly convicted of murder that leads him to life imprisonment in the seemingly inescapable Devil's Island.

This is not to see McQueen usual screen presence is still used here is most certainly is, and that is important at the beginning of the film as he quickly must makes sympathize with his plight as Papillon thinks of escape from the time he in the boat taking him to the island in the first place. McQueen takes command of the screen in his usual effortless fashion bringing us into sympathy with Papillon with an incredible ease even though we never do see clearly that he did not murder the man, but McQueen has the right conviction to show us it that it is the truth.

Early on the film McQueen is a very quiet and effective in conveying the strength within Papillon that makes it clear that Papillon he will try to find anyway he can to escape the island. McQueen is excellent in conveying the underlying passion in Papillon that is always something there within him through the entire film that pushes him forward to keep trying to find ways to escape. McQueen has such a great power in the role that establishes Papillon as a intelligent hero who will adapt to find a way out of his troubling predicament.

Papillon attempts his way out by offering protection to a rich fellow prisoner Louis Dega (Dustin Hoffman). Although Papillon only treats Dega as a tool to be used, much as how Dega treats Papillon the two due to their mutual predicament do become friends. McQueen and Hoffman really have some great chemistry here, and although very different types of actors in style they work together wonderfully well. The two ease into the friendship in a believable fashion that works well, there are not scenes devoted to it but the two create the friendship as the film goes along well.

The two's dynamic works well as Hoffman expresses the situations with the right fear, sickness, as a man inexperienced individual. McQueen is strong though as he shows Papillon who is more accustom to the harsh life, and even acts as a bit of a calming presence to Dega. What is fascinating though is the way McQueen technically has the less expressive role at first still manages to honestly be the more compelling performance here. He does incredibly well by bringing us into Papillon's struggle, as even as Papillon is able to handle the horrors McQueen still powerfully portrays more subtle reactions to them. 

The extreme understated way of his performance though does change in a way after Papillon finds himself in solitary confinement after a botched escape attempt. Really here is probably a place where honestly the film could have been trimmed, but McQueen performance here is so good I'm glad it was not. McQueen is outstanding in his portrayal of Papillon's physical and psychological degradation in the series of scene. He is so brutally painful here in how uncompromising his depiction of it all. It is a sad disheartening portrayal of how the extreme nature of the punishment can even damage the strong willed Papillon.

After finally being released though McQueen is good in showing that Papillon is not finished by any measure, and McQueen makes this entirely convincing showing that Papillon's will is powerful enough to push forward in another escape attempt. McQueen brings right along with him in his next attempt and is able to do so well in bringing to life every emotion to each situation. Whether it is his anger in yet another double cross, the pleasure of finding some brief happiness with a group natives, or bringing the weight to the moment in which Papillon sees he still will not be a free man once again. McQueen never fails to pulls us right into Papillon's struggle in every scene.

Papillon after being caught one more time is put through five years of solitary and finally being sent out to a secluded and calmer part of the prison. McQueen is excellent in these final scenes of the film as we see Papillon almost broke physically. McQueen shows Papillon as a tired man barely able to even effectively call out to his old friend Dega. Importantly though McQueen poignantly still portrays the glimmer of the passion in Papillon left to push him to try at least one more time to escape.

The final moments of the film is made especially moving by McQueen and it shows what is so great about his performance. In his performance he truthfully creates an honest depiction of the perseverance of human spirit, that is something that can seem very forced in so many instances, but McQueen does it beautifully here. This is a great performance that creates the compelling character of Papillon authentically and this may be his very best performance. This tremendous work by McQueen not only puts on display once again McQueen unique screen presence, but here he also is able to show how powerful of an actor he really could be.

Alternate Best Actor 1973: Gene Hackman in Scarecrow

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Gene Hackman did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Max Millan in Scarecrow.

Scarecrow is a film I quite liked. It is about two drifters who form a friendship and decide to make their way to Pittsburgh to open a car wash. I must say it is strange the way this film is as forgotten as it is, considering its two stars.

Scarecrow is a film very much a film made by the two performances as the two men who decide to go across country with each other. The two men are very different with one being very listless but easy going named Lionel played by Al Pacino, and the other being a man with seemingly more of a plan with a hard edged named Max played by Hackman. Hackman's Max is really a different performance by Hackman who commonly plays a man with some official authority. Here Max is a man without any authority other than that he feels he holds over himself, even if that only recently came back to him having been recently released from jail.

Hackman is an actor who knows how to create fascinating characterizations and this is most certainly true here in his creation of Max. He makes Max a rather unusual but very watchable type. Hackman is brilliant the way he makes Max a man with very specific quirks in his sometimes unusual manners, yet he never does make him at all quirky. Hackman knows how to do this so well in that he just infuses right into his character in a completely naturalistic fashion. There is never acting here by Hackman he just is Max from his first scene as he watches Pacino's Lionel with slight bemusement and he instantly establishes Max as a very particular sort as well as through just his slight smile the start of their relationship.

Max is a man who claims to have a plan and wants to take Lionel along on his venture to open a car wash, and tells him about his propensity for violence. One thing I love about Hackman how brash and blunt he is in portraying this aspect of Max. He claims he is cold blooded and Hackman gets that across marvelously through the quick incisive way he brings it across. It is not that Hackman shows that Max is some evil vicious killer in the least, but rather he portrays it really as his way just. The fashion in which he comes out in a violent manner, such as the first time when he yells at someone he thinks is eavesdropping. Hackman makes it quick to the point but something so natural coming from Max.

Max's sometimes brutal nature certainly could be taken as making the character unlikable and Hackman is never afraid to make him so if need be. Importantly though the anger within Max does not overwhelm he only makes it just part of the whole of Max. It is a part of him with a very strong history within him as Hackman makes it just his first reaction to adversity. Hackman though so easily eases in a certain likability in Max's no nonsense manner. Yes Max says things as he sees them, but he also says things as he sees them. There such a power in this approach that Hackman takes in the character. He is able to make such a commanding character who is equally unwieldy in the same breath. It is just astonishing to watch him maneuver this role that I never had a second thought about following him.

The crux of the film is the relationship between the two men as Max as the hard edged fellow who is almost kept under control by Lionel who softens him up with his comedy. I should quickly say Al Pacino is also really good here as Lionel. He is in a very different form, because of  extreme likability. He is very energetic here and really gets across how he could cheer up Max the way he does. Pacino never stops with his performance, and really gives a winning turn that balances some of the harsher moments from Hackman's performance perfectly. The two are just spectacular together in their interactions that play brilliantly throughout the film.

The way Hackman plays Lionel affect on Max is terrific. Hackman in moments sort of shows Lionel as a calming factor at first simply by making jokes constantly. Hackman makes it as almost just a distraction that takes Max's mind off of his current violence. At the same time though Hackman though does put in some genuine warmth that he downplays properly but he shows it as something that does keep Max going along with Lionel with ease. Importantly though the hard edge does not go away Hackman still shows Max as still having his harsh nature pushing forward against embracing him completely. Hackman is very realistic in portraying this very negative qualities in Max that just seems almost like reflex in Max.

Their relationship grows through the film but it does not take just a simple approach. Even as they seem to grow closer they break apart when they both end up briefly in jail which leads Max to give Lionel the silent treatment to Lionel. Hackman is excellent because, this does not feel something sudden or out of place. In fact it would seem odd for him not to do this because it is Max's way to do this. Hackman built this character so well it simply he makes it so it is obviously the only way Max would react. After Lionel though is savagely beaten by another inmate he befriended though Max snaps back into action for his friend. This is a very moving moment though because Hackman realizes it so beautifully as the best of Max comes out for his friend.

Their friendship only continues after leaving jail, and one of the best scenes for both actors is when Lionel finally is fed up with Max's anger, and shows his discontent with him first hand instead of just trying to make him laugh. Hackman is absolutely amazing in this scene as we see the old habits come out once again before Lionel presses him, than a whole new Max appears to try to make good on their friendship. The scene that has Max finally for once play for laughs, and it works wonderfully. The scene could have easily fell flat, but Hackman makes it extremely effective because he built to this point so well in his portrayal of the change Lionel created in him. As we see him avoid violence instead we see a break in the man, but Hackman makes this new Max just as real as the first.

The only scene stronger than this one though is after Lionel suffers a breakdown (an amazing scene by Pacino that easily shows this to be the far greater of his two performances of the year), and goes in to comatose. Their final scene together as Max tries to get Lionel to come back to him is stunning in the fashion in which it is played by Hackman. In this moment Hackman shows just how desperate Max really is, as well just how much Lionel really did mean to him. It is a heart wrenching scene as Max pleads Lionel to help him once again. Hackman gives this scene such an emotional weight, and the true poignancy their friendship deserves. What is amazing though is he still stays with the forceful character of Max as he seems almost partially angry over this breaking his plans so badly, but that only makes the impact even greater as Hackman allows us to see that is only there to shield how torn up inside Max is over what has happened. It is a flawless finish to the performance that perfectly realizes Max's journey as a character as well as the importance of the friendship as whole. All I can say to finish this review is I absolutely love this performance by Gene Hackman.

Alternate Best Actor 1973

Sunday, January 6, 2013

And the Nominees Were Not:

Edward Fox in The Day of the Jackal

Steve McQueen in Papillon

Martin Sheen in Badlands

Gene Hackman in Scarecrow

James Coburn in Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid

I'll apologize in advance for leaving so many out as this year simply was packed.
 

Blogger news

Blogroll

Most Reading