Pages

Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label 1960 Alternate Best Actor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1960 Alternate Best Actor. Show all posts

Alternate Best Actor 1960: Results

Thursday, September 13, 2012

5. Robert Mitchum in The Sundowners- Mitchum gives as usual a good performance that always stays very light but fitting to the film.
4. Max von Sydow in The Virgin Spring- Sydow although takes awhile to have his moment is quite powerful in his depiction of a father's grief and vengeance.
3. Marcello Mastroianni in La Dolce Vita- Mastroianni acts as an effective guide as for the audience through the decadence in Rome, as well as gives an effective portrait of a man slowly giving in to it.
2. Albert Finney in Saturday Morning and Sunday Night- Finney gives a raw and powerful performance as a frustrated young man who could care less of societal expectations.
1. Anthony Perkins in Psycho- Congratulations to both Michael Patison and Maciej for their correct predictions please feel free to name a year and a performance. This year was incredibly close for me not between Finney and Perkins, but between Perkins and Olivier. Perkins after all gives an outstanding performance as Norman Bates being truly terrifying in his chilling portrait of a deranged man. I still will have Olivier remain the winner for the moment since I really need to watch the Entertainer again to be sure because the two are definitely close. It would be easy to hand Perkins the win since he is amazing, but I could not cheat my favorite actor like that.
Overall Rank:
  1. Laurence Olivier in The Entertainer
  2. Anthony Perkins in Psycho
  3. Burt Lancaster in Elmer Gantry
  4. Albert Finney in Saturday Morning and Sunday Night
  5. Jack Lemmon in The Apartment
  6. Marcello Mastroianni in La Dolce Vita
  7. Kirk Douglas in Spartacus 
  8. Max von Sydow in The Virgin Spring
  9. Dean Stockwell in Sons and Lovers
  10. Spencer Tracy in Inherit the Wind
  11. Yul Brynner in The Magnificent Seven
  12. Robert Mitchum in The Sundowners
  13. Rod Taylor in The Time Machine
  14. Burt Lancaster in The Unforgiven 
  15. Paul Newman in Exodus
  16. Jules Dassin in Never on Sunday
  17. Frank Sinatra in Ocean's Eleven  
  18. Stuart Whitman in Murder Inc.
  19. Fredric March in Inherit The Wind
Next Year: 2003

Alternate Best Actor 1960: Anthony Perkins in Psycho

Anthony Perkins did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Norman Bates in Psycho.

Psycho, aside from the psychiatrist monologue, is a masterpiece of horror. The beginning of the film depicts a woman Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) who steals money from her employer's client, she goes on the run to meet up with her lover, but on the way is stays at the secluded Bates motel.

I suppose I should say that there will be spoilers in this review but really I should say just watch the film already. Also I would say this is one film that is quite difficult to go in completely fresh due to its constant examination. I would say that the original time I did watch the film I somehow or another was actually not aware of the twist of the film.There is not point in discussing this performance without discussing the twist of film though as Perkins's whole performance is intertwined with the revelation so completely. The revelation being of course that it is Perkins's Norman Bates who is the titular Psycho the film refers to.

This is a performance that very much only improves on initial viewing as the true nature of his character comes to life there is an even greater effect to Perkins's portrayal of Norman. When we first see Norman in the film almost thirty minutes in as Marion Crane accidentally ends up on an off rode where the Bates motel resides. Norman's entrance to the proceedings is pretty unassuming as he runs down from his rather eerie looking house to help Marion check into the motel. Perkins is certainly not his charming young man as he was in films like the Actress, and Friendly Persuasion, he is not completely opposed to those parts in just this first scene though.

Perkins is excellent in his first scene in that he shows Norman not to be necessarily something seriously wrong with him. Yes Perkins does not act as though Norman is perfectly normal though either as there is just the right amount of nervousness in his performance. Perkins makes Norman nervous and shy here, but it does not appear that there really is anything particularly wrong with him other than he probably does not talk to many people often, and certainly not very often to a beautiful woman. Perkins's properly gives no reason to suggests that here Norman is a murderer, making the revelations later on far more effective because of this.

Quickly though when Norman sits down with Marino for a meal after having a fight with his "mother" do we see more to Norman. Perkins is absolutely outstanding in his delivery of Norman's discussion about his hobby of taxidermy as well as his feelings about his mother. Perkins in regards to Taxidermy has the strangest glint in his eyes about stuffing dead things that enjoys to look at that is quite off putting, what makes it even more remarkable though is that Perkins still does well in suggesting that well Norman may be a bit odd he is not necessarily dangerous. This comes from the moment in which stuff as dog or cat portraying a softness to Norman.

Of course that is not the case when he speaks about his mother where Perkins is absolutely brilliant. Here there is the darkness that is Norman in his very unhealthy relationship to his mother. Perkins's performance here is layered in a way in which it comes off as really two both distinctly effective ways in both the initial viewing as well as any viewings after knowing all about the film. In the initial film Perkins is excellent in his depiction of Norman's love hate relationship with his mother. He shows a fierce connection to her that is quite off putting. Perkins suggest Norman is very much his mother's son and loves her deeply, to the point of over protection, but at the same time there is venom of the way he speaks of her that is hateful.

On the initial viewing is able to portray Norman as having a strange connection with his mother, but still he gives nothing away. On the other hand after watching the film this scene is made even more chilling by knowing exactly what his true relationship is with his mother. Norman has in fact already murdered his mother some time ago and has developed a split personality with half of himself being his mother. His lines such as "A Boy's best friend is his mother" or "We all go a little mad sometimes" with his slight smile have a whole extra level of terrifying implication in that he speaking of his own psychotic half. When it seems he is almost ready to become violent over talk of institutions, Perkins cleverly shows us Norman almost becoming the psychopath right there.

Perkins is quite incredible in the role by never being just a villain as Norman, and at times even becoming somewhat sympathetic in the scenes where Norman discovers people has killed while believing that it was his "mother" who in fact killed them. Perkins is authentic is portraying Norman's fear over what his "mother" has done as well as that the police will be coming for his mother. Perkins is great in the scenes where he tries to avoid questions regarding to Marion, and he effectively portraying the tension within Norman as he attempts to keep them away from finding out the truth of what has occurred.

The amazing thing about this performance is that although the character is commonly mentioned as one of the most memorable cinematic serial killers. The thing is you never really see Perkins kill anyone, and you only see him twice as the killer side of Norman. Perkins is flawless in his depiction of the man who has the killer within him, and through this subtly creates an unforgettable psychopath. Although most of his scenes are as the "normal" Norman he does have his two scenes that are very particular the first being quite brief but the second might be his strongest scene in the whole film. It is a silent scene for Perkins as he stares forward in what appears to be a look of confusion and fear of his fate. This slowly becomes a devilish smile. In this scene Perkins goes from the man to the psychopath in a truly horrifying moment. His final stare is truly the final statement on the terrifying nature of Bates, and a perfect end to this flawless performance.

Alternate Best Actor 1960: Marcello Mastroianni in La Dolce Vita

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Marcello Mastroianni did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Marcello Rubini in La Dolce Vita.

La Dolce Vita is an interesting even if overlong film that is an episodic story of the various moment in the life of a tabloid journalist.

La Dolce Vita is very Federico Fellini's picture from beginning to end. It is a director's picture the whole way through controlling the film with his remarkable imagery, and the actors are very much in service of their director. The characters are there very much to suit the points of the director's scene more than they are to create their own incredible characterization. This true just about down the line for the most part, it is even true to some degree for the leading man of Marcello Mastroianni, although he is allowed developments of sorts even though they are relatively limited. There is actually plenty of time for him still as this is a long film, but Marcello's story is hardly the only focus of the film.

Mastroianni acts as our guide through the various journey's into the very particular culture of the wealthy in Rome. Mastroianni has a very particular role in so many scenes which is being a watcher rather than the actor in many scenes. After all Marcello is a journalist in the film and his point is to observe for his articles not to be the person who the articles are about. As the observer Mastroianni is effective at being one. He brings attention to himself to only the right amount. Marcello is there always, he might not be the most flamboyant individual in many scenes, but he is always interesting to watch and Mastroianni effectively brings us into his observer status.

Mastroianni is his usual charming self, even though it is in a way purposefully muted here. Unlike in say Dark Eyes where he was all about romantic gestures, Mastroianni portrays Marcello's various romantic encounters with women in a very downplayed way. Marcello is constantly having affairs with women, but even when he approaches them with proclamations of the love his method is something that is almost depressed at times. This actually works terrifically for his character though who in terms of his romantic associations is a little bit like Albert Finney's performance from this year.

The most important part of Marcello's life as a journalist is how little pleasure that Mastroianni shows in all that Marcello does whether it is being in a party or wooing one of his romantic conquests. It is simply something he just does and goes along with. Everything that comes with it Mastroianni shows that Marcello only takes it in stride. It does not matter what it is even being attacked over getting involved with one of the many women he gets involved in. Mastroianni shows a very strong hesitation and exasperated in Marcello what he does. This is not from any pain that he has in the past really, but rather Mastroianni effectively shows that it simply comes from his whole sort of life.

Mastroianni carries his tired look at his life well most of the film without overdoing it to the point in which it becomes tiresome, he rather shows well the type of man that can come from living in the certain sort of decadence that Marcello stays in. Marcello is not always tired though and there are some very important moments in Mastroianni performance that are quite notable. One set of scenes in particular are when his father comes to visit him, and Mastroianni is very good in showing a very different side to Marcello. Mastroianni is very quiet in these scenes but moving as he portrays a tenderness in Marcello that hints at perhaps the possibilities of a different life for him, as Mastroianni makes it clear Marcello honestly does care about his father.

There are two other important scenes for Marcello's character outside of his normal spectrum. One consists of a fairly brutal fight with his clinging girlfriend where Marcello fights against moving away from his current life. Mastroianni is louder here than most of his other scenes as he brings to life the anger in him of not having any idea what he really wants, only that what he has really is not it. The other important scene for him comes when a tragedy occurs involving one of Marcello's friend. In this scene we see him lose his tired exasperation finally and there almost seems to be clarity in him over what has occurred. Mastroianni is almost silent here but he is very powerful in showing how deeply affected Marcello over what has happened.

Mastroianni performance ends in a final long scene where years later after the other action Marcello seems to have final done something. What that something is the is only going further into his the life of decadence, and Mastroianni is amazing in this final scene in showing just how pathetic Marcello finally has become. Before where he seemed tired here Marcello seems ready collapse in Mastroianni's depiction. There is not really even the slightest joy in him now which seemed to occasionally appear before. There is almost nothing left in Marcello now but the decadence which he tries to go further and further into, as Mastroianni portrays a drive to get something out of it, but there is nothing there. It is an incredible end to this effective work from Mastroianni which moves in a wonderful harmony with the film.

Alternate Best Actor 1960: Robert Mitchum in The Sundowners

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Robert Mitchum did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Paddy Carmody in The Sundowners. 

The Sundowners does not have an especially interesting story about a family of Australian family lead by the sheep herder patriarch who wants to keep moving who conflicts with his wife who wants to settle down. The material is not incredible but the film is very much elevated by the performances.

One thing notable about this film is that it is set in Australia, and to go along with that many of the cast members put on Australian accents to varying degrees of success. I will say none of the accents are ever distracting Mitchum included even though it really does hide his distinct voice. Although it might seem a little different at first the accents are actually well handled and it does help create the setting, and the accent never overcomes the characterizations.

Mitchum as the patriarch actually has less thankful roles. It is Deborah Kerr as Paddy's wife Ira who gets the more emotional moments that really drive the film. Peter Ustinov as a bit out of place British former captain but current herder and Glynis Johns as a hotel manager get to be the scene stealers. Mitchum actually stands as the man in the middle who stays pretty consistent in the film, what happens around him rarely changes how Paddy ever acts.

If there is an actor to portray a steadfast man who is going to do his thing his way no matter what it really is Robert Mitchum. Mitchum as usual has his strong presence in the role that is always effective in portraying the confidant nature of his character. He really is not nearly as strong willed though as Mitchum can be, but he effectively does tone it down to an appropriate degree to be able to portray Paddy's less noble qualities.

Paddy has a few problems one being he is not opposed to drinking money away, nor is he opposed to gambling it away either. Neither Mitchum or the film really give these that much weight, although they don't really have to as the film simply is not about Paddy being a drinker or a gambler. Mitchum deals with these fairly lightly as to fit the tone, and actually does work them in just fine by believably showing that they are simply just Paddy's normal habit nothing more.

The best part of Mitchum's work here probably is the very important chemistry he has with Deborah Kerr. It is very understated between them by well handled by both. Their relationship is very much non verbal at times and effectively so. Even though they certainly do not constantly say it, as the two have few overtly romantic scenes, but their love still is made genuine in both of them even though for the most part it is unsaid.

The main conflict in the film comes from the fact that Paddy wants to keep moving even if his family wants to starts settling down. Mitchum portrays this more as just something Paddy feels he needs to do more that some ache or drive. Again I feel perhaps maybe there should be something more overwhelming about his want, but then again Mitchum shows it as something enough to be believable as well as the way he portrays does fit in with the tone of the film.

This is entirely just a fine performance actually from Robert Mitchum and he actually does everything well. Technically speaking it would seem aspects of the character could have perhaps been weightier but than there would be an extremely different film and not necessarily a better one. It is hardly his best performance, and certainly is not the best thing about this film but he manages to do what he needs to for his role.

Alternate Best Actor 1960: Albert Finney in Saturday Night and Sunday Morning

Monday, September 10, 2012

Albert Finney did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Arthur Seaton in Saturday Night and Sunday Morning.

Saturday Night and Sunday Morning is an interesting character piece about a rebellious working class man who is having an affair with an married woman (Rachel Roberts), and at the same is beginning one with a younger woman (Shirley Anne Field).

The British kitchen sink dramas as they were known commonly feature a very particularly blunt black and white cinematography, and a man with rather unsavory qualities as a protagonist. To go along with the protagonist is usually quite a strong central performance by an actor such as Richard Harris's strong work in This Sporting Life, or Laurence Olivier's outstanding performance in The Entertainer. Albert Finney's performance is very much in the same vein in terms of style, as Arthur Seaton with many unsavory qualities, and is portrayed by Finney very effectively. 

Finney's Seaton is an angry young factory worker. Finney does not of course portray this as some sort of direct venom filled anger toward anyone in particular. There is a particular distaste for so many things around him particularly his boss, and his father that is well played by Finney. Finney makes it as basically as not something that Arthur is constantly going on about by any means. Finney though is very striking in though in the moments that Arthur brings about the hate in his eyes over the people he has no respect for like his father who he believes to be dead from the neck up.

Albert Finney has a powerful raw quality to his performance as this young man who in a certain way seems aimless. Yes he does indeed have prospects of a future it seems, but Finney makes it clear that there is no desire to really go on them. When he is working Finney portrays it as merely what must be done for Seaton to do what he wants. He shows no desire, or fervor in Arthur when he is working, only a distinct lack of respect for his boss. Finney is abashed in that Arthur has no cares for his job other than just the money it provides, which he would like more of, but that is not something he would ever stop hating his boss for.

When not at work or in his parent's home or at work Arthur enjoys the night life, although enjoy might not be the absolutely best word. Finney is good because he is not overbearing in the least in terms of the strong discontent in Arthur, and he is effective in actually showing really that there really does not seem to be an especially obvious solution to his problem. Finney is very good in showing a frustration within this man that never come off as him being smug, or even cruel, but rather he portrays it almost as like a troublesome itch. It is something that bothers the man, but he can't get rid of it because he does not know how.

After all the time he spends enjoying himself does not seem to rid himself of the itch, as there is always that slightly bothered feeling underlying Finney's performance. Also in his scenes with Rachel Roberts where Arthur takes part in an affair with an older married woman, but you'd still be hard pressed to find a moment where he is enjoying himself all that much. Finney has Seaton be a man who goes with this woman and has an affair with her seemingly just because why not. It is not that Finney portrays it like Arthur is this empty man, but in fact he quite effectively shows him to be a lively man seeking for joys from what he can, it just happens not to be all that much of joy in it.

Finney is excellent here becuase it is not as if Arthur is some sort of separate man from what he does and has no attachment, he does have attachment, but Finney brilliantly is able to bring a certain life to the character that always suggests a selfish youth in him. When she becomes pregnant, Finney is terrific in portraying Arthur's reaction to it. He most certainly is effective as he pulls right into the conversation constantly pushing the credits to end the pregnancy, very concerned only for his own problems that would come from it. Finney portrays his reaction as completely selfish although he really is fantastic because he makes Arthur not seem nearly as despicable as he really is.

One thing very important to the whole of Finney's  performance that makes it work as well as it does is his charisma he has in the role no matter what the situation. He makes Arthur into a fun loving man, that even with all his frustrations still remains a charming person in his own way. He is actually completely believable in his abilities to keep on good terms with both of the women he knows romantically, as well as so many of the other people around him. Finney brings us in right through Arthur's journey effectively never boring us for a moment.

Finney rejects the notion that a character change must be obviously portrayed by any means. Arthur's affair leads him to being severely beaten, but his relationship with the non married younger woman seems a bit more promising to him. Finney is good here becuase he does leave the results of Arthur's experience appropriately ambiguous, and rightly stresses the fact that Arthur's lack of experience as a man leaves him somewhat befuddled. The anger seems gone to a degree but not so much the frustrations. It is perhaps a lesson partially learned, and Finney makes far more meaningful by  keeping the change in Arthur subtle. This is a strong performance by Albert Finney, and a very notable early indicator of his talent as an actor.

Alternate Best Actor 1960: Max von Sydow in The Virgin Spring

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Max von Sydow did not receive an Oscar nomination for portraying Tore in The Virgin Spring.

The Virgin Spring tells the story of a prosperous man who avenges his daughter after her murder and rape at the hands of a group of herdsman.

Max von Sydow portrays the prosperous man who actually has a very simple role for about two thirds of the film. In the scenes before his daughter is murdered von Sydow is only briefly in the film. He is properly stoic as the patriarch of the household. In his manner at the table he shows a certain low key power as the head of the table. He also has one brief but important scene with his daughter. Sydow is effective in this in just portraying a warm but genuine relations between Tore and his daughter that properly establishes his love for his daughter that brings about his actions later on.

Sydow appears very little during the middle portion of the film. When he is on screen he keeps up the same strong presence, and he is entirely appropriate in his performance. He stays that way until he learns of the fate of his daughter which leads him to seek revenge. Sydow's first reaction of Tore's finding out about exactly what happened to his daughter is very effectively portrayed. It is rather fast, and Sydow handles it well by showing the emotions of despair quickly reigning on him, but portrays it along with a drive in Tore for vengeance.

Sydow portrays Tore's vengeance as something quite efficient. Sydow makes it a passionate moment for Tore even though it is rather quietly handled passion actually. The hatred, and anger toward the three people who were involved with act is embedded into Sydow's face, but he keeps it very much focused as Tore's goal never becomes forgotten for a moment. When Tore does murder all three of the them Sydow's gives it a certain efficiency. There is not a hint of hesitation in Sydow during the attack, he goes about one by one never giving a second thought for a moment. Sydow becuase of the lack of hesitation makes it a particularly brutal scene.

After the killing though Sydow finally shows Tore realizing his actions, as he simultaneously grieves over his daughter as well as is pained to a certain degree over his killing of the men. In his final scene where he simultaneously tries to make peace with God over having killed the men, but as well hates toward God over allowing the original act to happen, Sydow is quite powerful. He is able to still fairly quietly convey the complex internal struggle in this man, and movingly shows the deep hurt within the man over his horrendous experience.

This is not the most complex performance ever given by Max von Sydow, and his screen time is fairly limited as he only comes into the lead role for the final third of the film, but it certainly is a strong early work from him. He fully realizes his character the warm patriarch and father, and it is because of this that he is able to really give the appropriate impact to the scenes of vengeance. It is a very specific performance that effectively does the most with his role.

Alternate Best Actor 1960

Friday, September 7, 2012

And the Nominees Were Not:

Robert Mitchum in The Sundowners

Albert Finney in Saturday Night and Sunday Morning 

Anthony Perkins in Psycho

Marcello Mastroianni in La Dolce Vita

Max von Sydow in The Virgin Spring
 

Blogger news

Blogroll

Most Reading